![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And she did not "cut" chapters. She ranked them. That's why your first choice may not be on your next invite list even though you didn't "cut" them. |
One other thing. Even with the new upperclassman quotas at some of the big Texas schools, re-rushers are still at an extreme disadvantage. Those who are being looked on most favorably to potentially fill those openings are transfers and first time rushers.
|
^^^Yea, I wish the whole idea that PNMs are cutting chapters would go away. They are RANKING them.
It's almost as if the girls think that this annoying chapter that keeps inviting them to parties after the girl has "cut" them is somehow preventing other (more desirable) chapters from inviting them back. |
Quote:
You had a bid. You didn't accept it. Move on, please. |
Quote:
Using my own example as a template, I watched my house move from struggling to successful in two years because the brotherhood picked good, dynamic pledge classes from freshman through junior years, which led to picking more of the same. If we could do it, anyone can. The game ain't over until it's over; I'm betting on amperches to pull it off. |
Do you know amperches? Because from what I can tell, it seems unlikely for any rerushing junior to "pull off" rerushing to get a better house. Or do you have a magic 8 ball telling you that A&M's goingt o have a ton less PNMs next year?
|
Quote:
You obviously know nothing about the competitiveness of rush at schools like A&M. Please stay in your own lane. |
Quote:
This is a great forum for those of us that are learning......that said, I want to reiterate that my daughter did not find any chapters "repugnant", but rather out of 12 houses, she found one that she was not a good fit for. Why is this so surprising, are the PNM's expected to fit everywhere? I stated that she thought the girls were very nice and did a good job making her feel welcome, but they were involved in activities different than what my daughter was looking for.....from there one of the posters jumped to stating that she found this house "repugnant" and that as far as she knew "none of the chapters at TAMU were into torturing puppies or eating raw sheep eyeballs".....WOW that is a huge jump from "they were really nice but I didn't fit". |
TexasMom, don't sweat it. This thread has just touched a lot of nerves, and I know that's not what you said. The key point to take away, and I think you did, is that your daughter never CUT a single house. She ranked them lower and expected them to be gone. And although we hate for any PNM to not give a house a chance, the fact is that there are times for a girl to decide on one (or two) or nothing. We just hope and reiterate ad nauseam that on some campuses "or nothing" can really mean no house, no Greek life, no 50 year pin, etc. And maybe taking that last choice house wouldn't be so terrible after all, particularly in light of what you get for the rest of your life.
I'm glad it worked out for your daughter, and I'm sorry she had to make a difficult decision when her expectation was to have 3 houses on her preference card, any of which she'd be happy to take. The reality is not that many girls have the perfect rush and end that way. Thankfully in her case it was just a few minutes of stress, and not having to decide whether to take the house she was offered or not. |
Thanks DubaiSis
You are correct, I did take away the "ranking" versus "cutting" information which helps in understanding the process. My daughter is very happy - already attending chapter events with her new sisters and thrilled that she not only ended up on a house but that she met so many great friends during the recruitment process (from every house). As a mom, I am glad to know that none of the chapters are torturing puppies or eating raw sheep eyeballs......kinda funny now that I read that line again. I won't sweat it and again, thanks for the info. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.