GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   The 2008 presidential field at-a-glance (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=84049)

Drolefille 05-14-2008 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nate2512 (Post 1651292)
Yeah, he better get ready for November because if things keep going as they are McCain is going to tear him up.

Eh, everything that Hillary's thrown at him has had little effect on the election results. Even in PA after Wright, "bitter" etc. she still lost ground from when she started. McCain hasn't had any real pressure for a while and he can't directly attack Obama because he's promised to run a clean campaign. If he can't control the 527s then that can be used against his leadership abilities.

Should be interesting either way, I think that if the Democrats successfully paint McCain as Bush/Cheney II then they win.

nate2512 05-14-2008 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drolefille (Post 1651356)
Eh, everything that Hillary's thrown at him has had little effect on the election results. Even in PA after Wright, "bitter" etc. she still lost ground from when she started. McCain hasn't had any real pressure for a while and he can't directly attack Obama because he's promised to run a clean campaign. If he can't control the 527s then that can be used against his leadership abilities.

Should be interesting either way, I think that if the Democrats successfully paint McCain as Bush/Cheney II then they win.

McCain already leads Obama in the exit polls. So Obama when/if he does ultimately get the nomination, already has a deficit.

jon1856 05-14-2008 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nate2512 (Post 1651371)
McCain already leads Obama in the exit polls. So Obama when/if he does ultimately get the nomination, already has a deficit.

He does??
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._tracking_poll
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_c..._tracking_poll

nittanyalum 05-14-2008 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jon1856 (Post 1651377)

Interesting to see that Clinton's strength against McCain has grown fairly impressively of late as well... http://rasmussenreports.com/public_c...tch_up_history

starang21 05-14-2008 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1651222)
Not saying it to you....but reading the news....they are saying.....


"So...?"

exactly. i prefer her as a candidate.....but mathematically she can't win.

DaemonSeid 05-14-2008 01:14 PM

Race over Merit?
 
By Ruben Navarrette Jr.
Special to CNN

SAN DIEGO, California (CNN) -- In claiming victory in West Virginia last night, Hillary Clinton reiterated her last best argument as to why she should be the Democratic nominee: because only she can win in November.

Don't confuse that with what Clinton said in a debate just a few weeks ago about how she was confident that either she or her opponent could win in November.

How's that for chutzpah? She's arguing that the same person who couldn't win enough states in the spring against Barack Obama can win enough states in the fall against John McCain.

At least in West Virginia, Clinton chose her words more carefully than she did last week when she blurted out to USA Today that "Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again" and how whites who had not completed college were supporting her.

Clinton sounded less like George Washington and more like George Wallace. Imagine a presidential primary where, after more than 16 months, almost two dozen debates, hundreds of speeches, millions of dollars, and countless chicken dinners, the rationale for electing someone boils down to this: Vote for me. I'm white. I can win because other whites will vote for me.

Why, this could be the new affirmative action. Whatever happened to merit?

Clinton's message in West Virginia was smoother. "I'm winning Catholic voters and Hispanic voters," she told supporters, "and blue-collar workers and seniors, the kind of people that Sen. McCain will be fighting for in the general election."

Meanwhile, some white Americans are turning themselves inside out to come up with excuses for why they're not supporting Obama. It seems like just yesterday that these folks were arguing there is no racism in the immigration debate, and now they're insisting there is no racism in the presidential election.

Some want to know why it isn't racist when 70 percent of African-Americans vote for Obama but it is when 70 percent of whites vote against him.

The answer has to do with history. Over the decades, black Americans have had plenty of opportunities to vote for white people for president. And they have done so. But this is the first time that white Americans have a chance to vote for an African-American with a shot at the presidency. And what are they doing?

Many are responding quite well. Obama won the votes of many -- to borrow a phrase -- "hardworking white Americans -- in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska and Wyoming. But, elsewhere, as Obama said in a recent interview, people may need to get their head around the concept of an African-American even seeking the presidency, let alone winning it.


http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/...ef=mpstoryview

starang21 05-14-2008 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1651454)
By Ruben Navarrette Jr.
Special to CNN

SAN DIEGO, California (CNN) -- In claiming victory in West Virginia last night, Hillary Clinton reiterated her last best argument as to why she should be the Democratic nominee: because only she can win in November.

Don't confuse that with what Clinton said in a debate just a few weeks ago about how she was confident that either she or her opponent could win in November.

How's that for chutzpah? She's arguing that the same person who couldn't win enough states in the spring against Barack Obama can win enough states in the fall against John McCain.

At least in West Virginia, Clinton chose her words more carefully than she did last week when she blurted out to USA Today that "Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again" and how whites who had not completed college were supporting her.

Clinton sounded less like George Washington and more like George Wallace. Imagine a presidential primary where, after more than 16 months, almost two dozen debates, hundreds of speeches, millions of dollars, and countless chicken dinners, the rationale for electing someone boils down to this: Vote for me. I'm white. I can win because other whites will vote for me.

Why, this could be the new affirmative action. Whatever happened to merit?

Clinton's message in West Virginia was smoother. "I'm winning Catholic voters and Hispanic voters," she told supporters, "and blue-collar workers and seniors, the kind of people that Sen. McCain will be fighting for in the general election."

Meanwhile, some white Americans are turning themselves inside out to come up with excuses for why they're not supporting Obama. It seems like just yesterday that these folks were arguing there is no racism in the immigration debate, and now they're insisting there is no racism in the presidential election.

Some want to know why it isn't racist when 70 percent of African-Americans vote for Obama but it is when 70 percent of whites vote against him.

The answer has to do with history. Over the decades, black Americans have had plenty of opportunities to vote for white people for president. And they have done so. But this is the first time that white Americans have a chance to vote for an African-American with a shot at the presidency. And what are they doing?

Many are responding quite well. Obama won the votes of many -- to borrow a phrase -- "hardworking white Americans -- in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska and Wyoming. But, elsewhere, as Obama said in a recent interview, people may need to get their head around the concept of an African-American even seeking the presidency, let alone winning it.


http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/...ef=mpstoryview

obama is winning way more than 70 percent of the black vote. people should vote for who they want, and not worry about being scrutinzed as to why they voted for a particular candidate. and 70 percent of whites aren't voting for hillary.

Tom Earp 05-14-2008 03:06 PM

Still gag and choke on the candidates, all of them!:rolleyes:

I got rid of my red phone along time ago.

Munchkin03 05-14-2008 05:21 PM

John Edwards is going to endorse Barack, apparently.

Drolefille 05-14-2008 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nate2512 (Post 1651371)
McCain already leads Obama in the exit polls. So Obama when/if he does ultimately get the nomination, already has a deficit.

Depends on the day, the weather and the pollster. He hasn't had much in the way of competition as of yet.

DaemonSeid 05-14-2008 07:14 PM

Edwards is indeed endorsing Obama...and depending on who you talking to, in essense he may pick up 13 delegates as 12 had already endorsed Edwards...so will they stay on to endorse Obama?

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/...ama/index.html

nate2512 05-14-2008 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drolefille (Post 1651662)
Depends on the day, the weather and the pollster. He hasn't had much in the way of competition as of yet.

This is true, I saw on Fox News monday where they McCain basically raping Obama.

jon1856 05-14-2008 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1651668)
Edwards is indeed endorsing Obama...and depending on who you talking to, in essense he may pick up 13 delegates as 12 had already endorsed Edwards...so will they stay on to endorse Obama?

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/...ama/index.html

I was just about to post this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24628847/

Thetagirl218 05-14-2008 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nate2512 (Post 1651674)
This is true, I saw on Fox News monday where they McCain basically raping Obama.

ABC News this morning on Good Morning America has the exact opposite with Obama leading McCain by like 20 points!

All in the eye of the news beholder, I guess!

jon1856 05-14-2008 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thetagirl218 (Post 1651801)
ABC News this morning on Good Morning America has the exact opposite with Obama leading McCain by like 20 points!

All in the eye of the news beholder, I guess!

A campaign worker told me today the Obama's own polls show about a 10 point lead.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.