GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Greek Life (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   Just would like to know you opinion (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=71555)

Atlanta_OPhiA 10-22-2005 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Private I
At FSU APO is co-ed but at FAMU it isn't, and there is Gamma Sigma Sigma over there. Somebody recently mentioned that they wanted to bring GSS to FSU while many people in APO feel like it is redundant, seeing as it is co-ed already (it would make sense if it wasn't integrated, but it is). Any thoughts?
This is the case at Georgia Tech, except with Omega Phi Alpha instead of GSS. It's the same sort of situation as Senusret said... even though OPA and APO come from the same roots, they are two very different organizations. It's completely possible for a co-ed APO and a all-female OPA/GSS to exist on the same campus (we actually do a couple of projects a year with APO). That's not to say that there hasn't been drama between the two organizations, but both are able to co-exist and work together in the name of service.

Basically, the two orgs are different enough that it's easy for them to co-exist. We've had members of APO drop out and become OPhiAs, and vice versa. It just depends on the style of service and leadership that a particular person is looking for.

LightBulb 10-22-2005 02:11 PM

Mixers
 
I agree that APO should not be a member of the IFC. IFC contains certain organizations, just as NPC and NPHC do. APO is not one of them, but an inter-Greek Council would be a great place for them, as they should be represented if they choose to be.

Haven't read this whole thread, but APO could always mix with two groups at once, a sorority and a fraternity. Then everybody would be happy, no short end of the stick. :D

Tom Earp 10-22-2005 05:09 PM

There are Two Seperate Words that should be considered Here!

Service and Social.

As ErikC and I said in Posts, APO was started under the Pricnples of Boy Scouts of America.

It was later Changed to become a Mixed Organization such as My Chapter.

But, there is still a difference. Yes, One from a Service Organization can and many times does join a Social Organization and vice versa.

Bob London who is Nat. Director of APO is a LXA!

But for a College to Change and go against National Organizatins is uncalled for.:confused:

Each has its Rules and Regulations. And that My fellow Greeks is not any Colleges business to interdict into. Theyb Do Not Make Our National Polocies!!

preciousjeni 10-22-2005 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jackiepie
The school isn't doing this to hurt socials.
Err...ummm...can you really trust a school that has/had PLEDGED as required reading for a basic comp course?

http://users.rowan.edu/~giampalmi/CCI/CCI04sylb.pdf

SmartBlondeGPhB 10-22-2005 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by preciousjeni
Err...ummm...can you really trust a school that has/had PLEDGED as required reading for a basic comp course?

http://users.rowan.edu/~giampalmi/CCI/CCI04sylb.pdf

That would be a NO.

And to think, my original statements were just suppositions. I more firmly believe them now.

rocketgirl 10-22-2005 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by preciousjeni
Err...ummm...can you really trust a school that has/had PLEDGED as required reading for a basic comp course?

http://users.rowan.edu/~giampalmi/CCI/CCI04sylb.pdf

WOW

i can't even comment except to say that once again preciousjenni caught someone (the admin) by doing her research. Jackiepie...please please don't take us in a way that is against you specifically...but your administration does NOT have the best interest of the socials at your school at heart. I also wonder if the other orgs felt pressured to have an APO as prez for fear of being kicked off campus...

Now I have soooo many questions.

SmartBlondeGPhB 10-22-2005 07:57 PM

Well, I haven't read the book but it would give a lot of discussion material for a classroom setting........

But so would probably a lot of other books.

Jackiepie 10-22-2005 09:35 PM

33 girl. I said they were on my eboard for IFC. NOT APO. most people won't take any of our members because they view us as a viable organization on campus.

preciousjeni 10-22-2005 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rocketgirl
WOW

i can't even comment except to say that once again preciousjenni caught someone (the admin) by doing her research. Jackiepie...please please don't take us in a way that is against you specifically...but your administration does NOT have the best interest of the socials at your school at heart. I also wonder if the other orgs felt pressured to have an APO as prez for fear of being kicked off campus...

Now I have soooo many questions.

I actually got the tip from someone else ;) but found the evidence personally.

Jackiepie 10-22-2005 10:23 PM

Rocketgirl, I'm not taking this personally but I can't seem to stress enough that it was an open election. I ran against other people, 4 to be exact.People were nominated. They didn't have to vote for me. The DoS didn't even know I was running till after I got elected. He leaves that type of business to us. More than 50% of 9 of the fraternities on campus's reps elected Me.If each org. has 2 people as reps, and I got over 50%, they had 2 weeks between nominations and elections..they must have just cared as to who would do the best job and not what letters i wear across my chest.

As for pledged that was an english department choice. not a DoS. Some idiot thought that it was a good way of showing college life. The greeks on my campus have been fighting it, but honestly..it hasn't caused us a problem. We go to the comp classes reading and talk about how the book is not truely accurate. Greek Membership is up since it's been required so maybe they are just reading the cliffnotes. ;)

Attractive#7 10-23-2005 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by valkyrie

I don't understand how referring to people as something other than what they are promotes unity -- which is what I think this person was saying. Women and men are different, and I don't understand how acknowledging that indicates that people aren't on the same level.

Would you refer to non-white members as white, because to differentiate would mean that people aren't on the same level? I know that doesn't have the same historical context (or does it?) but I think it's similar.

Calling a non-white person white, and calling a female a brother are 2 totally different things. I am a female BROTHER of the fraternity. When we say brother we are not saying it in the sense of manhood, just brotherhood. Like all men are created equal...it doesn't refer to just men but mankind, which includes women. When you call a female in APO a sister, you lessen her value to our fraternity (IMO). Women worked hard to earn membership in this fraternity and I for one appreciate that.

To Jackiepie,

DO YOUR THING!!! It sounds like you are holding down your position. Keep up the good work. You did the right thing by running for a leadership position. You are completely right, if I have to pay my dues, I will take advantage of that and run for a position. Good Job!

I think the main concern of the brothers is why the heck the school would make you guys join a council. We understand you are making the best of the situation you are in. We are not faulting you. I am not faulting you. I don't question your ability at all. I question why the heck the DoS did this. I think a lot of the anger is not at you (not from the APO brothers who responded), but at the DoS and why he chose to go against our National Bylaws.

Keep holding down your position!!! Good Luck. You make me proud! :D (i know i know, i'm really sappy)

In L ,F, & S...

James 10-23-2005 04:42 AM

This is an odd thread.

This is my take.

If the IFC is a Council of male greek organizations with the exception of APO, then APO should not be on it. If the IFC is just random Greek letter organizations . . . then APO fits in just fine.

However, if the DEan of sTudents put you on it . .. well there you are. And I would assume the dean of students did it for cynical reasons.

These are the basic reasons. APO is not a male exclusive social fraternity. APO doesn't have the same purpose, operations, or concerns except in the most general ways. Therefore membership in APO does not automatically grant insight into the plight of male social fraternities.

Now. That being said you might be an extraordinary leader in a general way, but we can't know that. We know you got elected but thats not necessarily a momentous thing in an intergreek council.

Unless . . . did you have to go to each organization on the council and present yourself in front of their entire membership?

Generally its not hard to make office on an intergreek council . . especially in the North East where such things are taken . . well . . less seriously by chapters.

Also, the things you are doing as the IFC president are not things the IFC are really supposed to be doing.

The IFC is like a trade organization, its not supposed to limit membership and its not supposed to regulate its members in terms of punishment. If it punishes more often than the school . . what use is it?

If self regulation just means that the IFc persecutes itself rather than have the university use sanctions . . then the IFC is pointless and should dissolve.

If anything the IFC should be an advocate for its member groups . . much like a union.

As far as the alcohol and party programs that you have instituted . . . I admire anyone that does anything they think is constructive, but surely you know that each of the National organizations have in depth social policies and programs that probably go way beyond what the seminars you are presenting?

Unless you are actually teaching people the actual mechanisms of having a party such as where they can have one, who to contact, the expenses, and all the detail work of it?

Anyway, have fun being president and good luck.

rocketgirl 10-23-2005 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by James


Also, the things you are doing as the IFC president are not things the IFC are really supposed to be doing.

The IFC is like a trade organization, its not supposed to limit membership and its not supposed to regulate its members in terms of punishment. If it punishes more often than the school . . what use is it?

If self regulation just means that the IFc persecutes itself rather than have the university use sanctions . . then the IFC is pointless and should dissolve.

If anything the IFC should be an advocate for its member groups . . much like a union.

As far as the alcohol and party programs that you have instituted . . . I admire anyone that does anything they think is constructive, but surely you know that each of the National organizations have in depth social policies and programs that probably go way beyond what the seminars you are presenting?

Unless you are actually teaching people the actual mechanisms of having a party such as where they can have one, who to contact, the expenses, and all the detail work of it?

Anyway, have fun being president and good luck.

Exactly what I think. i don't understand how a member of a SERVICE organization with completely different national rules than any other IFC organization can even begin to run that council. From the earlier posts made, I don't think she understands what it means to be a social or what socials are all about. From looking at your school's website, they allow professional groups to be on their own w/o a council. Personally I think a great thing would be to push for your group to be accepted as a com/serve honors group instead of a social group. Unless the social aspect being on the council is so much that you wouldn't want to leave. Seeing as soo many greeks I know are APO and ____ (NPC,IFC, MGC, NPHC) I think something must be done so that your members are not limited to just APO. Something is going on there that is just not right.

preciousjeni 10-23-2005 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by rocketgirl
I think something must be done so that your members are not limited to just APO. Something is going on there that is just not right.
I have much love for my Z-Chi sister-Greek! You are too right here! Why in the WORLD would other GLOs on this campus not accept members of APO?? Membership in APO and a social GLO should be complementary, serving the individual and the "greater good."

Jackiepie, you mentioned something about APO being a "viable" organization. That has been under my skin since I read it. What's wrong on your campus that APO's viability would be challenged? (I do recognize the whole "real Greek" debate but for APO it shouldn't even matter. Do the opinions of uninformed people bar you from dedicating yourself to leadership, fellowship and/or service? If not, let it go.) Or are you saying that APO should be equally social and service so as to preclude the need for membership in a social org?

On the latter, for some people, APO is more than enough but I should hope that the general membership of our fine fraternity doesn't feel that they have to choose between our service organization and a social organization - or, in my case, a service-social organization.

I'm sure you're not saying it, but it sounds to me like you're bringing into question the need for social fraternities and sororities altogether. Then, with the comments about parties and drinking, you drive the point home.

bruinaphi 10-23-2005 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FreeBecky
When you talk about your group, do you say "my sorority" or "My womans fraternity"....semantics....many creeds and by-laws call themselves "womans fraternity", but the members call it a sorority
Actually, when most of us talk about our organizations we refer to them as our fraternities. I have never called Alpha Phi a "womans fraternity" or even, which might be more likely, a "women's fraternity."

Tom Earp 10-23-2005 03:26 PM

Is this becoming a moot point by now?:(

preciousjeni 10-23-2005 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom Earp
Is this becoming a moot point by now?:(
Or maybe a MOO point? You know, it's like a cow's opinion.

Tom Earp 10-23-2005 05:00 PM

Hello and Yes

Dont over cook the eggs for dinner!:p

33girl 10-23-2005 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jackiepie
33 girl. I said they were on my eboard for IFC. NOT APO. most people won't take any of our members because they view us as a viable organization on campus.
Oh OK, sorry for the confusion.

I'm not sure "viable" is the word you want in this example.

polarpink 10-23-2005 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rocketgirl
Personally I think a great thing would be to push for your group to be accepted as a com/serve honors group instead of a social group.
Hmm, I think it is kind of funny that so many people on this board have a huge problem with the way social fraternities at Rowan are represented yet the actual social fraternity members at Rowan don't really care and elected Jackiepie anyway.

I think it is just another example of how each campus has such a different personality and culture.

I like hearing the difference in opinion, but I disagree with what rocketgirl said.

I don't think that I would have any right, even as a member of Alpha Phi Omega, to tell Jackiepie that her chapter should push to be accepted (probably meaning categorized though) as a service group.

Maybe that chapter is more similar to a social fraternity than a Circle K for example. If it were my chapter, I would take offense to rocketgirl's suggestion because I would know what my chapter dynamic is better than an outsider would.

I think one of the benefits of a PHA or IFC type organization is that it provides a forum for like-organizations to interact. It seems exclusionary for someone who doesn't even belong to that campus to make as assessment of who should and shouldn't belong.

Each chapter of Alpha Phi Omega has its own personality. If they want to be viewed in the same light as social fraternities, so be it. It is not my place to tell ANY chapter how to be classified or how to govern itself, especially if they have their act together.

33girl 10-23-2005 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by polarpink
I think one of the benefits of a PHA or IFC type organization is that it provides a forum for like-organizations to interact. It seems exclusionary for someone who doesn't even belong to that campus to make as assessment of who should and shouldn't belong.
Yes, it provides a forum for like orgs to interact. Solely due to the fact that Alpha Phi Omega has men and women - not to mention the differences in membership policies - it isn't a "like org" in a council full of all male groups.

Quote:

Originally posted by polarpink
Each chapter of Alpha Phi Omega has its own personality. If they want to be viewed in the same light as social fraternities, so be it. It is not my place to tell ANY chapter how to be classified or how to govern itself, especially if they have their act together.
Like I said before, if you mention APO to someone (who knows about the different groups on campus - I don't mean a random peson who doesn't know Alpha from Zeta) and "service" isn't the first thing that comes to their mind, IMO that chapter does not "have their act together." Of course we want to know people that APO does have a social aspect and that we have fun and do care about each other as brothers, not members. But when the social overrides the service, there's a problem. Go to our website, and there it is: "Alpha Phi Omega National Service Fraternity."

Jackie said herself that APO members cannot get bids from social fraternities because of their APO membership. APO members should not ever have go through that or be made to feel that way - by members of other fraternities or by their own brothers. I know we (and probably every other chapter in the country) had the occasional brother who said if you joined a NPC or IFC you were a traitor, should choose between the two, etc etc. If you (univeral you) feel that way, fine, but that should be everyone's individual choice and not something forced on them. I think that happens in every group but because APO is so diverse, it's probably something we have to deal with a lot more.

rocketgirl 10-23-2005 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by polarpink
Hmm, I think it is kind of funny that so many people on this board have a huge problem with the way social fraternities at Rowan are represented yet the actual social fraternity members at Rowan don't really care and elected Jackiepie anyway.

I think it is just another example of how each campus has such a different personality and culture.

I like hearing the difference in opinion, but I disagree with what rocketgirl said.

I don't think that I would have any right, even as a member of Alpha Phi Omega, to tell Jackiepie that her chapter should push to be accepted (probably meaning categorized though) as a service group.

Maybe that chapter is more similar to a social fraternity than a Circle K for example. If it were my chapter, I would take offense to rocketgirl's suggestion because I would know what my chapter dynamic is better than an outsider would.

I think one of the benefits of a PHA or IFC type organization is that it provides a forum for like-organizations to interact. It seems exclusionary for someone who doesn't even belong to that campus to make as assessment of who should and shouldn't belong.

Each chapter of Alpha Phi Omega has its own personality. If they want to be viewed in the same light as social fraternities, so be it. It is not my place to tell ANY chapter how to be classified or how to govern itself, especially if they have their act together.

I am not trying to tell them how to govern themselves or how to act...but I am saying that APO as a whole from every member I've ever met and from the way they were on my campus is service first. My other concern is that if they are meeting this basic principle, then they are nothing like the socials they are on the council they are on by pure definition and national bylaws. Obviously it would be hard to exist on a council of people with completely different operation procedures than your own. It would be even harder to govern that council.

Nobody is saying that all APO chapters are the same...just like nobody thinks that all social greek chapters are the same. But all chapters should be following the same set of guidelines nationally that govern what they do and how they exist in an operational sense.

polarpink 10-23-2005 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 33girl
Like I said before, if you mention APO to someone (who knows about the different groups on campus - I don't mean a random peson who doesn't know Alpha from Zeta) and "service" isn't the first thing that comes to their mind, IMO that chapter does not "have their act together."
I think just because an Alpha Phi Omega chapter maybe be just as social as service based, doesn't mean they are in error. Not to deflect from the thread, but we have several all-male chapters in existence, one specifically on a co-ed campus that continues to be exclusively all-male in their bylaws. That is probably one of the strongest chapters we have on a national basis.

I don't think that each chapter has to be uniform in that it is co-ed and focuses ONLY on service because I have seen many chapters flourish that didn't fit into that mold yet still have their act together.

Quote:

Originally posted by rocketgirl
But all chapters should be following the same set of guidelines nationally that govern what they do and how they exist in an operational sense.
Rocektgirl, I see the point you are trying to make, but that is not how things work with Alpha Phi Omega, at least not right now.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.