GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   Palin gives keynote speech at 'tea party' gathering (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=111125)

DrPhil 02-17-2010 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1897927)
So are you starang21? That is who I quoted and asked the question of.

It read like a rhetorical question.

ThetaDancer 02-17-2010 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1897927)
So are you starang21? That is who I quoted and asked the question of.

Don't be a dick...obviously I'm not starang21. But I read it like a rhetorical question, this is an open discussion board, and I've brought this to your attention before but you continue to ignore it.

Ghostwriter 02-17-2010 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThetaDancer (Post 1897943)
Don't be a dick...obviously I'm not starang21. But I read it like a rhetorical question, this is an open discussion board, and I've brought this to your attention before but you continue to ignore it.

Hmm. Don't get your panties in a wad. There are numerous instances of posters using different ID's in GC.

Because some people refer to themselves and others in their group by using the "n word" that does not make it okay to refer to them as such. Why? Because it is inflamatory, unnecessarily offensive and serves no purpose other than disparagement.

If those who attended the Tea Party events referred to themselves as "teabaggers" it was more than likely because they had not heard the term used as a sexual act. I know I had never heard of it prior to MSNBC harping incessantly about it. Just so you know, I attended several "Tea Parties" last year. You and I both know it is a pejorative term, so why would one want to use it? The answer: to be unnecessarily offensive, to inflame and to disparage.

I have now answered you. Can we be friends? :)

starang21 02-17-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1897887)
Why

because i want to

:)

knight_shadow 02-17-2010 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1897950)
Because some people refer to themselves and others in their group by using the "n word" that does not make it okay to refer to them as such. Why? Because it is inflamatory, unnecessarily offensive and serves no other purpose other than disparagement.

Not necessarily.

Ghostwriter 02-17-2010 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knight_shadow (Post 1897957)
Not necessarily.

Come now. If I were to start throwing that word around on the forum it would start WWIII. I would be banned and rightfully so. Why? Because it is inflamatory, unnecessarily offensive and is used to disparage. I stand by my comment.

knight_shadow 02-17-2010 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1897966)
Come now. If I were to start throwing that word around on the forum it would start WWIII. I would be banned and rightfully so. Why? Because it is inflamatory, unnecessarily offensive and is used to disparage. I stand by my comment.

I wasn't asking you a question.

I made a statement. And that statement stands :)

starang21 02-17-2010 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1897966)
Because it is inflamatory, unnecessarily offensive and is used to disparage.

last i checked, people are entitled to do that.

DaemonSeid 02-17-2010 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1897950)

If those who attended the Tea Party events referred to themselves as "teabaggers" it was more than likely because they had not heard the term used as a sexual act. I know I had never heard of it prior to MSNBC harping incessantly about it. Just so you know, I attended several "Tea Parties" last year. You and I both know it is a pejorative term, so why would one want to use it? The answer: to be unnecessarily offensive, to inflame and to disparage.

So, whose fault that they called themselves teabaggers without researching the term first?

I don't even think that's in the same ballpark as what you are saying.

Heh.

If it bothers you that much then you may want to call oxford over its inclusion as word of the year.

DaemonSeid 02-17-2010 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demost (Post 1897995)
Actually they called themselves the Tea Party. It was the Dems that gave them the name teabaggers.

prove it.

DrPhil 02-17-2010 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1897950)
Hmm. Don't get your panties in a wad. There are numerous instances of posters using different ID's in GC.

You know that you were just telling her to mind her own business.

DrPhil 02-17-2010 02:55 PM

So, was Ghostwriter trying to say "cocksucker" or was he trying to say "the n word?"

And is he really dumb enough to think the history behind "the n word" is comparable to that of "teabagger?" Does he think people really give a shit about a term that some people consider derogatory because it is supposedly in reference to a sexual act that is not even common knowledge?

Seriously?

DaemonSeid 02-17-2010 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1898013)

Seriously?

Rearlly...

knight_shadow 02-17-2010 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1898013)
So, was Ghostwriter trying to say "cocksucker" or was he trying to say "the n word?"

And is he really dumb enough to think the history behind "the n word" is comparable to that of "teabagger?" Does he think people really give a shit about a term that some people consider derogatory because it is supposedly in reference to a sexual act that is not even common knowledge?

Seriously?

A penis is a little north of the "teabags"

N-word isn't.

And agreed on the 2nd part.

DrPhil 02-17-2010 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knight_shadow (Post 1898017)
A penis is a little north of the "teabags"

N-word isn't.

And agreed on the 2nd part.

I'm just floored.

I wish Ghostwriter would've saved his stupidity for the 2 threads that could've been fantastic GC race wars (John Mayer and Amy Bishop). The system has failed us.

ETA: LOL. Did you trick me into giving Ghostwriter the benefit of the doubt instead of assuming what I thought, which is that he was saying "the n word?" Just when I was trying to be GC Nice. Darnit.

DaemonSeid 02-17-2010 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demost (Post 1898031)
You prove it.



You are the one that said they gave themselves the name teabaggers. Prove it.

Awww...what caused you to edit out what you said about Obama?

We already know you are a racist idiot. You have proved that much.


Moving right along.

DrPhil 02-17-2010 03:23 PM

I don't know why people really give a shit but:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andy-b..._b_460769.html

http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?...&sc3=&id=89676

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teabagging

ETA: So anyone who isn't a complete dumbass can see that "teabagger" was self-titled for many tea partiers (party over here!) until the sexual connotation became more widespread. As someone who thinks all of these political parties, categories and affiliations are dumb as hell, I say get the hell over this bullshit and go back to the SUBSTANTIVE.

DaemonSeid 02-17-2010 03:27 PM

You shouldn't have...really.

DrPhil 02-17-2010 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1898044)
You shouldn't have...really.

It took 2 minutes on Google and I'm impartial to all of this political bullshit. :)

If this was a more important topic, such as race and gender, I would tell the fuckers to do REAL research on their own.

DaemonSeid 02-17-2010 03:33 PM

Well let's sit back and wait to see if a Rimjob party would spring up.

or Salad Tossers for Freedom.

dreamseeker 02-17-2010 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1898055)
Well let's sit back and wait to see if a Rimjob party would spring up.

or Salad Tossers for Freedom.

this is made even more gross by the fact that i had a salad for lunch. :mad:

knight_shadow 02-17-2010 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1898055)
Well let's sit back and wait to see if a Rimjob party would spring up.

or Salad Tossers for Freedom.

*clutches pearl necklace*

That's just plain nasty!

DrPhil 02-17-2010 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1898055)
Well let's sit back and wait to see if a Rimjob party would spring up.

or Salad Tossers for Freedom.

Both of which were nonsexual things before sexual acts were named after them. :)

Ghostwriter 02-17-2010 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1898021)
I'm just floored.

I wish Ghostwriter would've saved his stupidity for the 2 threads that could've been fantastic GC race wars (John Mayer and Amy Bishop). The system has failed us.

ETA: LOL. Did you trick me into giving Ghostwriter the benefit of the doubt instead of assuming what I thought, which is that he was saying "the n word?" Just when I was trying to be GC Nice. Darnit.

I find the term "teabagger" to be offensive. So what. Others don't but that doesn't make it less offensive to me.

The word I referenced was what was said and "Knight Shadow" had it right. I didn't spell it out but I can. North of "teabagger" was an attempt at humor. Maybe a poor attempt, at that, but nevertheless an attempt. Sorry you didn't understand but Knight Shadow did so it wasn't lost on all.

My point about what is inflamatory may or may not be a good comparison but I believe it has some level of validity. Take it as that or don't. Your choice.

DaemonSeid 02-17-2010 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1898058)
Both of which were nonsexual things before sexual acts were named after them. :)

my point exactly.

DaemonSeid 02-17-2010 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1898059)
I find the term "teabagger" to be offensive. So what. Others don't but that doesn't make it less offensive to me.

The word I referenced was what was said and "Knight Shadow" had it right. I didn't spell it out but I can. North of "teabagger" was an attempt at humor. Maybe a poor attempt, at that, but nevertheless an attempt. Sorry you didn't understand but Knight Shadow did so it wasn't lost on all.

My point about what is inflamatory may or may not be a good comparison but I believe it has some level of validity. Take it as that or don't. Your choice.

When you look in the mirror, do you see a teabagger?

Does it bother you that others may see you as such?

And what makes you think the 'rest of us' didn't get it?

Sometimes it's just easier to let people stew on their own words.

DrPhil 02-17-2010 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1898059)
COCKSUCKER

See how easy it is to just say what the hell you're trying to say instead of playing games and leaving it up to people to figure out?

DrPhil 02-17-2010 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1898059)
Take it as that or don't. Your choice.

Oh and fuck off with your failed attempts at dismissiveness.

knight_shadow 02-17-2010 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1898058)
Both of which were nonsexual things before sexual acts were named after them. :)

What the eff is a "real" rimjob (not the booty-hole pleasuring connotation)?

DaemonSeid 02-17-2010 03:50 PM

Go look it up....LOL

*sorry having a madmax moment!*

DaemonSeid 02-17-2010 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demost (Post 1898080)
Is that your idea of proof?

Are you that stupid? The first link is to a story dated February 12, 2010. The term did not start a week ago, genius.

The term probably start a year or so ago and was given to the Tea Party by low class Democrats. At that point a few Tea Party goers went with the term.

Then go look it up yourself jackass...

*sorry, I was having one of your moments!**

Ghostwriter 02-17-2010 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1898066)
Oh and fuck off with your failed attempts at dismissiveness.

http://www.pnworldwide.net/images/my...rying-baby.jpg

You hurt my feelings!

knight_shadow 02-17-2010 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1898081)
Go look it up....LOL

*sorry having a madmax moment!*

You look it up. While you're taking care of your kids!


No...only one type of rimjob pulls up on page 1 of google. I don't care enough to continue searching, though, so I guess I'll never know lol

DrPhil 02-17-2010 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1898089)

Says the person who is too chickenshit to get over being a teabagger.

DrPhil 02-17-2010 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demost (Post 1898080)
Is that your idea of proof?

Are you that stupid? The first link is to a story dated February 12, 2010. The term did not start a week ago, genius.

Even ya mama's smart enough to get what the links are providing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by demost (Post 1898080)
The term probably start a year or so ago and was given to the Tea Party by low class Democrats. At that point a few Tea Party goers went with the term.

Prove it. Nevermind, I don't give a shit.

Either way, if Tea Partiers are as smart as they claim they are, they won't subscribe to something that OTHERS call them if they don't identify with it and find it offensive. Duh.

Ghostwriter 02-17-2010 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1898064)
See how easy it is to just say what the hell you're trying to say instead of playing games and leaving it up to people to figure out?

Sorry. Thought there was a no profanity clause on GC when I signed the agreement. Guess I was wrong - cocksucker!

DaemonSeid 02-17-2010 04:04 PM

^^teabagger.

DrPhil 02-17-2010 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knight_shadow (Post 1898072)
What the eff is a "real" rimjob (not the booty-hole pleasuring connotation)?

It can be a job with the company RIM or a tire job. :)

knight_shadow 02-17-2010 04:05 PM

http://www.mtv.com/onair/yo_momma/NE...ma_281x211.jpg

DrPhil 02-17-2010 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter (Post 1898103)
Sorry. Thought there was a no profanity clause on GC when I signed the agreement. Guess I was wrong - cocksucker!

Congrats.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.