deepimpact2 |
10-15-2009 01:38 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
(Post 1857680)
Ok...exactly how thick headed and blind are you?
I'm not upset over 'those kind of kids' I actually find it funny that you had the STONES to even post that little ditty after the bullshyte you put KSig and Kevin through last weekend over that post you knee jerked over and everyone and their gran'ma had to explain the context TO YOU.
Having a hard time now trying to explain 'those types of children' hmm?
Doesn't feel so good now does it?
Any ol' ways...moving from your irrelevant rants to another.
Yes. Rules are in place to be followed...rules are also in place to be interpreted which is WHY rules tend to CHANGE.
and this...
School systems need to stop being so political and allowing parents to run over them. Many parents are just NOT going to accept or admit that their child is wrong in certain instances...
Just as some schools need to be fair and not think that every little child that walks in the door and makes ONE mistake (that can easily corrected by education and not punishment) will make that child a hardened criminal.
Read the article.
He. Did. Not. Know.
He is SIX.
|
No, I'm not having a hard time explaining my terminology. I made it clear in that other thread that from now on, none of you need to get offended when I use such terminology since you pitched a fit over the way I reacted to it. So that isn't me being hypocritical. I am now doing what YOU and others said was perfectly fine. So YOU have no grounds to complain. If you had the intellectual prowess you THINK you have, you would have realized that.
In response to your statement about acting as though the child is a hardened criminal because of one mistake...I don't think anyone is saying this child or any other child who has one incident is a hardened criminal. The point is that it is far too risky for school officials to start making allowances on a case-by-case basis. How fair would it be for them to determine that one child needs a "talking to" and that another child needs severe punishment? If you have one rule that covers it all, at least you don't allow much room for abuse of discretion.
And if you would stop trying to come against me so hard and use your head you would realize that.
Finally, with respect to your comment that he did not know? What's your point? Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Even at six school officials can make a child understand that they cannot bring guns or knives to school. Furthermore, his mother knew, yet she is responding as though this is just truly shocking. Perhaps she should have confiscated the knife in her own home only allowing him access to it when he is supervised. Wait, I'm sorry, that's asking for a parent to do their job as a parent. My bad.
You're pathetic.
|