![]() |
Quote:
if you're not sure whether a semicolon should be used. dont use it. i mean unless you are ABSOLUTELY sure, just look at it! ; the damn symbol is giving you a choice: end the sentence (.) or keep going (,). but if youre that fly, do the damn thang and ( ; ) that sentence like its ya birfday! |
Quotations!
Quotations go outside of the punctuation!
Example: Del said, "I can't believe it's not butter." "I love to look outside," replied Del. I know there are exceptions with question marks and exclamation points. Can someone jump in there. Another Rule That is Often Broken: Insure/Ensure Insure is used to reference money. Example: It is expensive to insure a car. Ensure is used to secure or gurantee without referencing to money. Example: Exercising ensures a healthy body. |
This isn't a grammatical error per se, but it's one I see often on GC and every time I do it makes my toes curl:
Discreet: careful and circumspect in one's speech or actions, especially in order to avoid causing offense or to gain an advantage Discrete: individually separate and distinct |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For example it is now okay to start a sentence with But, And, and Because. Ensure, insure, and assure can now be used interchangeably. Use commas sparingly and mainly for clarity--more is not better. The double dash, which is turned into a long dash by Word, seems to be replacing semi-colons. The rule for using which v. that is overshadowed by the fact that if you use which, put a comma in front of it. Business writing has become less formal, but the rules are still very much different than creative writing. Being a good writer is subjective to the type of writing you are doing. A good creative writer is not necessarily a good business writer and vice versa. |
Quote:
|
can someone give me the lowdown on using parentheses inside of parentheses? i feel like it shouldnt be done... but sometimes you have a lot to say that needs to be stated and its not necessarily worth a footnote.
|
Quote:
Ladygreek, ensure/insure/assure can be used interchangeably? Amazing. I just took a class not too long ago and that's what I learned. Rules change so much. Thanks for the info. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The apostrophe as it relates to NPHC Founders
All NPHC organizations have more than one founder. Correct? Founder is singular. Founder's is singular possessive Ex: That founder's elephant collection is on display at National Headquarters. Founders is plural. (more than one) Founders' is plural possessive. (belonging to more than one) Ex: The founders' degrees are on display at National Headquarters. Founders Day, in the case of Delta Sigma Theta, does not need an apostrophe. At all. I cannot speak for the other 8 organizations on the apostrophe's presence, but I do know that it shouldn't ever be Founder's because there is more than one founder. So next January I want to see more Happy Founders Day and zero Happy Founder's Day. Por favor. |
This is a great thread. I give my students Strunk & White every time they come into the library and scream about needing help on a paper, but the writing lab is closed. Now I can brush up on my own skills!
|
what about the/thee? Sometimes in church, the hymnal says "the", but people pronounce it "thee".
Also, I'm VERY annoyed by the word peoples....I know it's in the bible, but dang it sounds WRONG every time I hear it.:mad: |
thee is old english, I believe (thee/thou/thus, etc.)
pronouncing "the" as "thee" i think is just an idosyncracy, it doesn't really change the meaning of whatever noun it is, just makes it sound more important. CT4: I disagree. I think it should be Founders' Day because the day belongs to the founders. (plural possessive), IMO. I've seen it all kinds of ways though, so I refer back to my grammar school English lessons re: the plural possessive. *the above is in regards to NPHC orgs in general and not specific to ZPB or DST, specifically.* |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.