It doesnt matter where you live, the HS statutory rape case I mentioned happened in Detroit.

And while it may be a dumb kid thing, or even accepted now (I don't think 14-15 year old girls having sex should be readily accepted), guys just can't put themselves in those situations. I always thought he was paranoid, but my father has always been big on me being careful around girls of questionable character. Similar thing with police or whoever, you simply can't give them any reason to get you for something.

The first thing I thought when I read the story was that if I ever have a son I will definitely drill this into his head.

If that's smart to you then I don't know what isn't.

So is how you see it supposed to negate something?

Most people that I hung around had enough class to realize that screwing around with a skank whore of a girl that young when you are in high school is pretty damn inappropriate.

Get over starang21 and get over it, in general.

Is there much of a difference, except in persspective, between a 17 year old having sex with a 15 year old or a 25 year old doing it? Either a girl can consent or not.

What is interesting is that consent is not something a 15 year old girl an give . . she isn't adult enough . . but she can committ murder and be considered an adult.

And there is an enormous double standard if the genders had been reversed. Which doesn't make any sense at all when looked at in a way that examines the logical underpinnings of such laws.

Trying to legislate social situations like this is actually kind of stupid.

The point that these people in this thread are making is that this happens quite often, and also to white males who have sex with white females, so it isn't a race issue.

Their point is valid however, like was already stated, race compounds many issues and this tends to be one of them. That's evidenced by the comments I've read on other boards and in-person regarding this topic. Race may not (read: may not) have been a factor in the fact that he was arrested and so forth, seeing as though things like this happen all the time, but it would be interesting to see if it may (read: may) have been an extralegal and undocumented factor in the sentencing. That can't really be proven but I'd be interested to see the sentencing criteria either way.

Well, its seems pretty clear by you colorful thread title and the posted article that you think this dumbass moron was dealt a serious injustice and prevented from going to college because of the fact that he is black.

....or maybe you think gangbanging a 15 year old on video is acceptable behavior.

I think that these types of situations are extreme and most people aren't tried for having sex with someone 2 years younger. For the most part, statutory rape cases are dealing with a more cut-and-dry age differential.

Really?

In some cases that age difference could be a junior dating a sophomore. That was pretty common if I remember correctly.

I wonder how many people we all know that could have been found to be sex offenders if they were prosecuted to the letter of the law . . in some states anyway. How many of our parents?

Remember that statutory is definined differently from state to state.

Keep in mind that if he had intercourse with her it would have been a misdemeanor, it was the fact that she blew him (oral sex for you prudish people) that made him it a felony and gave him ten years.

Damn! Talk about poison blow jobs, every time she sucks a cock she ruins a life worse than a freaking venereal disease. Sh's like a plague vector! I wonder if they nickname her like Typhoid Mary . . what could we call her that would be an equivalent nickname? Might be another thread topic.

I wonder how many others that were not videotaped that she blew in her career as a ruiner of lives and stealer of souls?

Yes, really.

This is the case I was talking about in the earlier post. It's pretty similar to whats going on with this kid here.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1998/...ain23051.shtml

Yah, you and pika2001 are right about that. I was being glib.

And I was referring more to antiquated sex laws, like the oral sex thing than racism per se.

It's the sentencing differential that's the real point people around the country are making, not whether or not both whites and blacks are arrested and sentenced for statutory rape. Of course, many of us know firsthand that race can also factor into whether or not someone is accused and reported for forcible rape and statutory rape--but that's not the topic.

The issue with Wilson (what starang21 posted) may just be GA's archaic statutory rape law--which was later altered to not include oral sex but that doesn't help Wilson because it isn't retroactive. Are they telling us there was no other alternative than to declare him a child molestor? :rolleyes: