Not likely.

Perhaps it's the broadcaster in me, but I try not to make absolute statements without attribution or a disclaimer that it is something I think -- as oppossed to something I know.

On another tangent, the headline in the Rocky Mountain News this morning was pretty dramatic.

One word:

Revelations

Well, the topic is on gay sex......so, does he really have to comment on cheating with another woman?

Catholicism I believe.


And what is your deal with these "opinion" disclaimers. Shut up, its a message board. I'm pretty sure that most people on this forum with half a brain would realize that Shinerbock is posting his opinion when he calls a guy getting hired to have gay sex with a guy....."filth." When he says something and writes "in my book".....that is more than likely an opinion. Being a journalist, I would expect you to know that.

No, the topic is hyprocisy.

Wow. There's a new word. Mind giving us a definition??

LandSig, Well, I don't know what that word means.........but I guess I gathered that the topic was gay sex with an evangelist judging by the title of this thread and the contents of the article.

What, exactly, do you find hypocritical? Knowing that Shinerbock is a Southern gentleman, raised in a good environment.....i'd be willing to bet that he believes that a guy who cheats on his wife is "filth" as well.

My bad - hypocrisy. Misplaced the 'r'.

Never said shinerbock was being hypocritical. I was referring to the topic of Haggard preaching against gay marriage and then turning around and having an affair with a man. And, if you notice, shinerbock already replied back about cheating with a woman, too.

Co-sign

Gentleman is pushing it. Man, yes. Gentle...

No, it was inferred. Nothing about the statement implied that a married man cheating with a woman was okay.

It was an inference that the two examples given by shinerbock, both directly related to the subject matter of the thread, were exclusive rather than illustrative. In light of the context of this thread -- the accusations concerning Haggard -- it was an unwarranted inference.

If this wasn't an actual serious debate, this would definatly get a great big "OH, SNAP".

Oh, excellent. Maybe not a classic in the same league as the celebrated "Headless Body in Topless Bar," but a great headline nonetheless.

was he too rough for you? lol

Whoa kids. I think I'm a southern gentleman, but there are probably people on this board who aren't into such things.

Kinky bastard aren't you? :D