But, you see the quote was something HOOSIER had said. How am I violating the TOS when I quote something HOOSIER said?

And, the two posts were completely separate.

So, again, I would like to know why you deleted both posts? Do you even have any idea what they said?

Nice try, Earp. However, your post once again doesn't make the slightest bit of sense.

Maybe Hoosier said something that violated the TOS. Or maybe he quoted someone who did.

No, I don't remember what it said.

I don't much care either.

If there wasn't something wrong with it, it would likely still be there.

You're right. Point taken.

yes, outstanding post. hazing should be mandatory. i think that too many people think that hazing is dangerous and threatening, when in actuality, it is the opposite. i dont know one person who has gone through pledgeship and hazing that has not said it was the best worst time of their life.

Some people even write stories about how they "love" hazing on the Internet!

And how they like to grope their pledge brothers.

BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

Did you perhaps mean BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALS?











And now I think I'm starting to understand why those who promote hazing enjoy it so much. ;)

You mean somewhat like the PMRC? You know, those overzealous senators' wives in the 80's led by Tipper Gore who were on a crusade to stamp out naughty lyrics in music? And to find the naughty lyrics they had to listen to those songs OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER again?

Why'd you have to drag Tipper into this? :(

Because she sucks?

Tipper doesn't say things like that about you.

That's because I don't suck. :)

Poor Tipper.

You're gunning for a no-invite to her birthday party if you're not careful.