Right.

and... shiddddddd. Some of these Nupes are Nopes. but again, everyone isn't hot everywhere.

Because, Sigmas everywhere don't look like this:
http://heartofsigma.org/wp-content/u...08/snap014.jpg

I would hope not with the way they're wearing those pants in that picture.

That depends.

I consider 95% of the Kappas I have seen across chapters and across states to be unattractive, unsexy, and trying way too hard to seem confident.

Move on. Clearly you are far too good for the likes of us.

If you were banned, it was because you are a pig.

Ask the Yeti.

LOL. I thought that was Iota Man. Oh well, whoever these usernames are, it is dumb to ban a username over calling members of a GLO ugly. Do you really care?

lol
Hilarious!

But his username is freaking hilarious! lol

When I'm attracted to a man initially, I'm not dealing with the core aspects of him, because the inner attributes are not what I first observe. It is a lot more than what he looks like that really attracts me, although the physical is essential, to me. However, those men in that picture look like sheep sh*t on a rocky mountain (all of them). Handsome is definitely in the eyes of the beholder, because men covered in tattoos, wearing boots, with their pants hanging off their butts is disgusting and unattractive, to me. Hmm, how would I describe men like that? FUBAR?

I'm going assume for the sake argument that you really are clueless and not a troll. I doubt it, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. I've known a few stupid, creepy guys who needed an education.

Here's where you are going wrong:

1. You assume that women in old movies represent some sort of reality. They're not. They're idealized fantasy images. They always have been. Even in the women in Playboy, gorgeous as they undoubtedly are in real life, are made up, well lit, airbrushed, Photoshopped, and shot in soft focus. There is not time in history in which this was not true.

2. You proceeded to describe Greek women in general as fat and trailer trash. Regardless of whether that was true or not, it's offensive and rude to say something like that to members of the group that you are denigrating. The only thing that it leads to is "No, we're not." "Yes, you are." "No, we're not." "Yes, you are." Gentlemen don't describe women in these terms.

3. When you were told to knock it off and then banned, you came back to double down on your rude, offensive behavior by describing a specific group of Kappa Delta women who you view as "poor white trash." Again, gentlemen don't describe women in these terms.

4. After being so incredibly judgmental and rude that you were BANNED for it, you return you now say that you don't view yourself as better than the women you are judging. Here's a clue: if you judge someone negatively, you are expressing a feeling that you are superior to them and have the right to judge them. By judging the appearance of women, you are relegating them to an inferior role as a sex object.

5. You seem completely unaware that Greek women exist for a reason other than to be sexually appealing to men in general and you in particular. As I said "Be hot" is not in the mission statement of most orgs.

I can't take the sexism, Dr. Phil. It's killing me.

Normally I would agree but this is so overtly silly that I say grow thicker skin. ;)

Afterall, can every username get banned for something deemed sexist, homophobic, racist, etc.? If so, we'd have fewer usernames. Seriously.

The operative phrase is "judgmental and rude." You don't have to let every thought you have come out of your mouth or out of your keyboard. It's rude.

You asked why you were banned and you asked why people took offense to what you said. I explained. If you don't want to know the answer, don't ask.

One more time, for the last time:

Describing any woman as "fat" or "poor white trash" is rude. Describing sorority women to other sorority women in that way is particularly rude. If you continue doing that, you are going to get bad reactions from people.

Good luck, son. You're going to need it.