![]() |
Quote:
I don't care. You obviously don't get the point. It has nothing to do with rules. You took information that was obviously not meant for you (as you are not a member of your daughter's organization) and blabbed it on GC. If you can't accept that this type of information is Membership Selection information and not for dissemination across the internet, then you have a problem with judgement. I doesn't bother me if you think I'm mean. You obviously don't think much. Consider the consequences before your type. And by the way, deactivating your PMs so I can't respond back to you after YOU started the conversation with me is so adult. Kudos. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
My PMs are not deactivated. They have always been open. Now I'll call you a liar. You have lied about this entire event. You lied about who told you that your daughter's sorority cuts second time PNMs. You said that an upperclassman just told you that they cut upperclassman. LIE. You specifically said that you knew they cut a girl that rushed a second time. It's so hard to keep up with your own lies sometimes, isn't it. Maybe I am being mean. It's pretty obvious that you aren't very smart. I should just let you go. It seems that you are living vicariously through your "popular" daughter who pledged at "top 3" chapter at Miss State. Good for you. Now go play on CC with the other moms that never went to college.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You did talk about private membership selection information for her chapter. It might not be top secret coming directly from their ritual but it is private. Your daughter shouldn't have shared it with you and you definitely shouldn't have put it out on the internet. Because you are not a member of that sorority. You are not a member of that chapter. When it comes down to it, you really don't even know for sure since it's something someone told you. You aren't there to witness it and never will be. |
I specifically tried to PM you several times and had no record of it ever going through. Like I said, I'm new at this. I have not lied about anything, so it's not hard for me to keep up with anything. How rude of you to say that I'm not very smart. And you think you are? I have no idea what CC is and you don't need to inform me. Incidentally, I went to college and have a master's degree. How presumptuous of you to assume I never went to college. But, hey, let's keep this up. It's more fun for everybody to fight in public!
|
Quote:
|
Old enough to have gone through college and grad school. Your guess.
|
ElvisLover, why did you delete your reply to AzTheta where you thanked her and basically said you were wrong and shouldn't have written what you did? You said that you deleted your posts but couldn't get rid of the info entirely because other people had quoted it. I know I didn't imagine that post. Why now have you reversed course and claim that you were never wrong at all?
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
I know I saw it.
|
Oh for the love of Mike. You have GOT to be kidding me. Seriously?
pbear and Old Row, you forgot to include that EL indicated she was in a sorority at an SEC school, but not the same school and chapter as her daughter. This is rich material, but I'm not going anyplace with it. From where I sit it looks to me like this is about the almighty SEC TOP TIER (three? five? something like that is what EL referenced in her posts on at least two prior occasions) - whatever the hell that means. The other 21 NPC sororities can take re-rushers and depledgers, but not those TOP TIER chapters. That's the flavor I'm getting. EL, you previously admitted you crossed a line or two. It's simply wrong to talk about confidential membership selection; there's no justification for it to make it all right. I find it very interesting that you posted :eek: in response to my statements on another thread regarding collegiates, mommies and daddies spilling everything on the Internet, and then retracted your posts on this thread. My post to you upthread still stands as does that other post. It also appears that EL hasn't mastered the message system on GC. For the umpteenth time: we do not discuss membership selection on GC. No women's GLO that I know of does, regardless of conference. It's verboten. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.