GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   Duke coed's sexual history "senior thesis" goes viral (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=116350)

Tulip86 10-05-2010 04:08 PM

haha, some examples do come to mind...

PiKA2001 10-05-2010 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tulip86 (Post 1991029)
insinuating another woman is a whore (unless she got paid to have sex) is never o.k. in my opinion...

An neither is calling someone out when you are partaking in questionable behavior yourself.

agzg 10-05-2010 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knight_shadow (Post 1991034)
Is 'slut' more acceptable, since there was no exchange of funds (just fluids)?

Slut shaming is not appropriate. She's just an idiot. Shame the idiot, not the slut.

knight_shadow 10-05-2010 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by agzg (Post 1991051)
Slut shaming is not appropriate. She's just an idiot. Shame the idiot, not the slut.

Even if the slut calls someone else a slut?

I'd think that would warrant a "what's good for the goose..." type of response.

pshsx1 10-05-2010 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knight_shadow (Post 1991044)
Men can be (and often are *cough*pshsx1*cough) whores, too.

ETA: That should read "can be called whores" as well.

Well, takes one to know one and homegirl is meeting all of the requirements. :)

knight_shadow 10-05-2010 04:26 PM

:eek: She has more than just 'whore tendencies'?

That's what she gets for buying those clear heels :(

Drolefille 10-05-2010 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knight_shadow (Post 1991053)
Even if the slut calls someone else a slut?

I'd think that would warrant a "what's good for the goose..." type of response.

If we're trading aphorisms, two wrongs don't make a right.

Munchkin03 10-05-2010 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Always AlphaGam (Post 1990999)
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this "study" took 4 years to complete.

I think she focused on a specific time frame--she refers to guys she hooked up to prior to the beginning of "her studies."

Sucks to be her. I mean, really...she's at the beginning of her career and her adult life, and the first thing that people will Google about her is this. It'll continue for a while, and could impact other people in her life--both now and in her future.

Kevin 10-05-2010 05:17 PM

If I were her, I'd strongly consider having my name legally changed.

christiangirl 10-05-2010 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tulip86 (Post 1991029)
insinuating another woman is a whore (unless she got paid to have sex) is never o.k. in my opinion...

:rolleyes:

33girl 10-05-2010 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by christiangirl (Post 1991080)
:rolleyes:

Either everyone (male and female) is a whore or everyone (male and female) is a rock star. Double standards in this day and age are ridiculous. The people who espouse them are usually the ones who end up screwing up their own lives in a major way. These include:

-the girls who "don't want to be slutty" who do nothing but date the same guy for forever, then after they're married, wake up and realize all they missed and screw around on their husband

-the guys who want to marry a virgin and then end up going to prostitutes on the side because the virgin doesn't know what to do and they don't know how/think it's wrong to teach her

Stupid, stupid, stupid.

agzg 10-05-2010 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knight_shadow (Post 1991053)
Even if the slut calls someone else a slut?

I'd think that would warrant a "what's good for the goose..." type of response.

Slut shaming is never appropriate.

christiangirl 10-05-2010 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 33girl (Post 1991081)
Either everyone (male and female) is a whore or everyone (male and female) is a rock star. Double standards in this day and age are ridiculous.

No one but that girl has yet espoused a double standard. He openly pursued her purely for sex and because of what he said and did, she called him a whore. After all that she's done and said to get these guys in bed, she needs to not be name-calling. They engaged in the same behavior--pursuing each other just for sex--so she didn't have the right to call him a whore.

Munchkin03 10-05-2010 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by christiangirl (Post 1991087)
No one but that girl has yet espoused a double standard. He openly pursued her purely for sex and because of what he said and did, she called him a whore. After all that she's done and said to get these guys in bed, she needs to not be name-calling. They engaged in the same behavior--pursuing each other just for sex--so she didn't have the right to call him a whore.

Really?

christiangirl 10-05-2010 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Munchkin03 (Post 1991091)
Really?

Really. I think what she did was unbelievable. I'd feel the same way if roles were reversed. Regardless of gender, it takes a lot of gall to run around sleeping with people just to "collect" them, then turn around and call someone something like that. 33girl is right, it's either both of them or neither. If she doesn't call her behavior by that name, then she certainly should not be using that word on him.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.