GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   Shooting at Northern Illinois University (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=93805)

DaemonSeid 02-15-2008 01:17 PM

NIU Gunman Stopped Taking Medication
 
Published: 2/15/08, 12:05 PM EDT
By CARYN ROUSSEAU and DEANNA BELLANDI
DEKALB, Ill. (AP) - The man who gunned down five people at Northern Illinois University in a suicidal rampage became erratic after halting his medication and carried a shotgun to campus inside a guitar case, police said Friday.

The man, 27-year-old former student Stephen Kazmierczak, was also wielding three handguns during Thursday's ambush inside a lecture hall.

Two of the weapons - the pump-action Remington shotgun and a Glock 9mm handgun - were purchased legally less than a week ago, on Feb. 9, authorities said. They were purchased in Champaign, where Kazmierczak was enrolled at the University of Illinois.

The other weapons were still being traced.

The gunman's father, Robert Kazmierczak, briefly came out of his house in Lakeland, Fla., to talk to reporters.

http://www.att.net/s/editorial.dll?p...ne+topnews&ck=

em_adpi 02-15-2008 01:32 PM

According to the ADPi website, all of the sisters at the Delta Omega chapter are safe.

dukedg 02-15-2008 01:39 PM

Delta Gamma's website says all DGs at NIU are accounted for and safe.

http://www.deltagamma.org/forms/Nort...0statement.pdf

AlwaysSAI 02-15-2008 01:45 PM

We have an SAI chapter there. I hope all of the sisters are okay. I wanted to cross reference the chapter roll with those injured, but their website isn't up to date.

If any of you hear anything, let me know. I'm gonna go check the national website now.

Wasn't there a high school shooting earlier this week as well? On Monday?

jon1856 02-15-2008 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scandia (Post 1601046)
It is almost as if there were an epidemic of shootings.

Or should I say pandemic? After all, there was a school shooting in Finland last year.

So sad.

This is the fifth school shooting in a week in the U.S.
The shooting followed a string of violence in schools.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,1411020.story

"Last Friday, a woman shot two students to death and killed herself at

KSUViolet06 02-15-2008 02:07 PM

According to our HQ site, all members of Tri Sigma's Beta Alpha chapter are safe and accounted for. Thank goodness.


Jill1228 02-15-2008 03:11 PM

I got this from livejournal


- Two women from the Sigma Kappa chapter are injured.
- A brother from Pi Kappa Alpha was killed. (and I can see we ID'd him) :(

polarpi 02-15-2008 03:16 PM

Update on ADPi National Website (and has been posted in the ADPi forum here) - all our sisters at NIU are safe.

Keeping the community of NIU (students, faculty, alumni, and family) in my thoughts and prayers...

Sister Havana 02-15-2008 05:05 PM

Anyone hear anything about Alpha Phi Omega's Eta Chapter Brothers?

Senusret I 02-15-2008 05:08 PM

Region III,
As you are most likely aware, there was a tragedy on the campus of Northern Illinois University today in which students were wounded, some fatally. I wanted to relay to you that to our knowledge, all of the Brothers and Pledges of Eta Chapter are safe at this time.

In their time of mourning, the Region VI Director, Rob Coop, is asking that we give them space to deal with this tragedy.When more information becomes available, including a way to lend your support to the Eta Chapter, I will let you all know. Please take care of each other in this time of shock and sadness.

In LFS,
Dawn

DGTess 02-15-2008 05:55 PM

Grateful that most of the students at NIU are uninjured, and in somber memory of those killed, I have to ask when we are going to start holding these universities and other schools accountable.

When are we going to recognize that someone like this shooter, with no criminal history, can do something so evil, and allow our students and professors to take charge of their own safety?

When are we going to point out that Illinois legislators are culpable? They have removed the option for law-abiding citizens to do anything but phone 911 and wait helplessly?

When are we going to push for the right to defend ourselves, our families, our brethren? When will we INSIST on having the CHOICE to defend ourselves?

I'm disgusted at any university administration and any legislature that does not permit self-defense.

jon1856 02-15-2008 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DGTess (Post 1601633)
Grateful that most of the students at NIU are uninjured, and in somber memory of those killed, I have to ask when we are going to start holding these universities and other schools accountable.

When are we going to recognize that someone like this shooter, with no criminal history, can do something so evil, and allow our students and professors to take charge of their own safety?

When are we going to point out that Illinois legislators are culpable? They have removed the option for law-abiding citizens to do anything but phone 911 and wait helplessly?

When are we going to push for the right to defend ourselves, our families, our brethren? When will we INSIST on having the CHOICE to defend ourselves?

I'm disgusted at any university administration and any legislature that does not permit self-defense.

Unless you mandate everyone who carries a gun get professional weapons training, we will return to the Wild West.
And where and how do you place "limits" on what type of weapons.
Hand guns, long guns, single shot, three shot, fully automatic military style, what caliber et al ?
And even pros get into trouble.
A few weeks ago in White Plains, NY an off duty, undercover officer was disarmed during an arrest and while picking up his weapon he either disregarded or did not hear warnings from other on duty officers. He was shot and killed.
The four officers involved in the shooting were doing what they trained to do; serve and protect.
It was rush hour; hundreds of people in area.
Just as the officers on campus did. They were there within minutes. And event was over within minutes.
The students seem to have done the right thing; get out of the way and get out of building.
Just how many college students do you know who have had professional weapons training?
I know one; a Brother who was a police officer.

While in Whitefish, MT a few years ago I thought I was in Dodge City.
I saw six shooters everywhere.

This kind of argument ends up being much like argument over death penalty.

How about if we just stay on topic of event here.
We can start a new,different thread on gun laws.
As well as a thread in R/M about guns in chapter houses.

jon1856 02-15-2008 06:02 PM

Link to School's Newspaper
 
Found this link on CBS New site.
For campus newspaper:
http://www.northernstar.info/

BetteDavisEyes 02-15-2008 07:25 PM

According to the Sigma Kappa National Website, 2 of our sisters were in fact harmed. There is a letter from the Gamma Zeta chapter posted on the main site.

texas*princess 02-15-2008 08:12 PM

i can't believe this. it's so sad that it is not even safe to go to school :(

jon1856 02-15-2008 08:29 PM

News updates-a few interesting ones:
Five lives full of promise ended in rampage

Young victims included Army veteran, violinist, aspiring teacher

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23186319

College shooter's deadly rampage baffles friends

Kazmierczak, 27, stopped taking meds; police search for girlfriend

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23171567

University shooter interested in 'peace and social justice'
  • <LI class=cnnHiliteHeader _extended="true">Story Highlights <LI _extended="true">NEW: Shooter was "committed student, extremely respectful," school adviser says
    <LI _extended="true">He "always paid on time, never a noise problem," ex-landlord says
    <LI _extended="true">Paper says shooter's interests included political violence, peace, social justice
    <LI _extended="true">Classroom killer shot five people to death, wounded 16 others Thursday
    http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/15/uni...ect/index.html<LI _extended="true"><LI _extended="true">Company: Gunman, Virginia Tech shooter used same Web dealer
    • <LI class=cnnHiliteHeader _extended="true">Story Highlights <LI _extended="true">NEW: The same company operates a Web site patronized by both gunmen
      <LI _extended="true">Three shooting victims remain in critical condition
      <LI _extended="true">Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich orders flags flown at half-staff throughout the state
      <LI _extended="true">Police chief: People close to gunman say he had become "erratic"
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/15/uni...ef=mpstoryview

DGTess 02-15-2008 09:07 PM

Quote:

Unless you mandate everyone who carries a gun get professional weapons training, we will return to the Wild West.
And where and how do you place "limits" on what type of weapons.
Hand guns, long guns, single shot, three shot, fully automatic military style, what caliber et al ?
And even pros get into trouble.
A few weeks ago in White Plains, NY an off duty, undercover officer was disarmed during an arrest and while picking up his weapon he either disregarded or did not hear warnings from other on duty officers. He was shot and killed.
The four officers involved in the shooting were doing what they trained to do; serve and protect.
It was rush hour; hundreds of people in area.
Just as the officers on campus did. They were there within minutes. And event was over within minutes.
The students seem to have done the right thing; get out of the way and get out of building.
Just how many college students do you know who have had professional weapons training?
I know one; a Brother who was a police officer.

While in Whitefish, MT a few years ago I thought I was in Dodge City.
I saw six shooters everywhere.
Well, since the topic is "Shooting at Northern Illinois University" ......

Please - what about the "wild west" are you referring to? Bloodbaths in the streets? Oh, by the way, that's movie stuff, not history.

Who said anything about limits? Frankly, the 2nd amendment says, in part, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." I didn't draw a line; the shooter used a shotgun. Any type of firearm might - note might, not would - have saved some lives.

Frankly, I know many college-age students with significantly more weapons-handling experience than many police officers I know. In my area of the country, officers are required to qualify ONCE A YEAR - between 50 and 100 rounds - and many don't fire any more than that. Most recreational shooters and CHL permittees I know fire much more than that.

One officer was disarmed. Anecdotal evidence sure is handy, isn't it?

And, one more question. How many murders or massacres did you see in Whitefish?

nittanyalum 02-15-2008 09:13 PM

Tess, this is NOT the appropriate thread for the path you're trying to steer this conversation. Please have some consideration and start another thread if you want to continue your 2nd amendment rights rant.

texas*princess 02-15-2008 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nittanyalum (Post 1601729)
Tess, this is NOT the appropriate thread for the path you're trying to steer this conversation. Please have some consideration and start another thread if you want to continue your 2nd amendment rights rant.

agreed.

DGTess 02-15-2008 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nittanyalum (Post 1601729)
Tess, this is NOT the appropriate thread for the path you're trying to steer this conversation. Please have some consideration and start another thread if you want to continue your 2nd amendment rights rant.



THIS IS A RANT AGAINST THOSE NANNY-STATE UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS AND LEGISLATORS WHO WOULD MAKE STUDENTS HELPLESS. These students were SHOT, for god's sake. They could do NOTHING to help themselves. They could do NOTHING to help others. They were fish in a barrel

If you want to start a pity-party thread, go ahead. This is a news and politics forum, with a newsworthy event, and legislators who won't protect us.

LPIDelta 02-15-2008 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DGTess (Post 1601633)
Grateful that most of the students at NIU are uninjured, and in somber memory of those killed, I have to ask when we are going to start holding these universities and other schools accountable.

When are we going to recognize that someone like this shooter, with no criminal history, can do something so evil, and allow our students and professors to take charge of their own safety?

When are we going to point out that Illinois legislators are culpable? They have removed the option for law-abiding citizens to do anything but phone 911 and wait helplessly?

When are we going to push for the right to defend ourselves, our families, our brethren? When will we INSIST on having the CHOICE to defend ourselves?

I'm disgusted at any university administration and any legislature that does not permit self-defense.

Tess-- I am actually coming around to your way of thinking. Last semester, some students at the university where I worked wanted to see a change in policy to allow students to carry (legally acquired and permitted) guns on campus, in light of what happened at Virginia Tech. Today I read something that basically said that most gunmen know if they visit a college/university campus, they know that there likely won't be any resistance. But, if they know people carry there, they may think twice. After all, you rarely hear of gun shows being the target of a gunman.

Yes, I still worry about sick, immature or stupid people with weapons BUT laws don't stop those people from doing what they intend. I don't know--I find it so sad that we keep feeling these losses, and I am out of ideas about how to address it without allowing people to arm themselves.

SWTXBelle 02-15-2008 10:09 PM

FYI - the Luby's massacre in Killeen was a major factor in the the passage of the concealed carry law in Texas.

And I can't imagine the pain of those parents - and fellow students, faculty and staff. :(

LatinaAlumna 02-16-2008 12:50 PM

Update: There were more greeks involved:

Ryanne Mace, of Delta Psi Alpha Co-Ed Fraternity was killed.

Her fellow member, Maria Ruiz, is in critical condition.

I received this information from an email over the NALFO listserve. My condolences to these families.

jon1856 02-16-2008 02:37 PM

Gunman's Friendly Exterior Masked Past


By ASHLEY M. HEHER and CARYN ROUSSEAU,
AP
Posted: 2008-02-16 06:58:46
Filed Under: Nation News
DEKALB, Ill. (Feb. 16) - Steven Kazmierczak's quiet, dependable and fun-loving exterior masked troubling details from his past that emerged as a stunned community struggled to understand what caused the 27-year-old to open fire on a class at Northern Illinois University, leaving six people dead.
http://news.aol.com/story/_a/gunmans...14171009990001

How the NIU Massacre Happened

The first thing Lhee Santos remembers of the worst afternoon of his life was the tall, thin man kicking open the door on the lecture hall's right side. It was 3:06 p.m. and the intruder walked onto the stage, startling the professor, Joseph Peterson. The unannounced visitor bore several weapons, including a 12-gauge shotgun, a 9-mm glock pistol and two other pistols. He wore jeans and a t-shirt and carried a guitar case. The 150 or so students in the introductory geology class thought it was all just a joke. That is, until the gunfire started. The first body down was the professor's.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/arti...eed-cnn-topics

KDAngel 02-16-2008 09:18 PM

Dan Parmenter was the Pi Kappa Alpha that was killed. He's closely connected to my best friend, so it's so crazy to feel so connected to this.

He dated Lauren Debrauwere (the Sigma Kappa who was shot and is in critical, but stable condition). She was sitting right next to him when he was killed. I can't even imagine that... I'm just happy she's alive.

The names of everyone's out there now, I don't feel bad posting. I think if anything it'd be good to pray for Lauren to get well and to be able to cope with this horrible tragedy.

jon1856 02-16-2008 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KDAngel (Post 1602135)
Dan Parmenter was the Pi Kappa Alpha that was killed. He's closely connected to my best friend, so it's so crazy to feel so connected to this.

He dated Lauren Debrauwere (the Sigma Kappa who was shot and is in critical, but stable condition). She was sitting right next to him when he was killed. I can't even imagine that... I'm just happy she's alive.

The names of everyone's out there now, I don't feel bad posting. I think if anything it'd be good to pray for Lauren to get well and to be able to cope with this horrible tragedy.

I can understand you feelings and perhaps others here can as well.
I too have had a few (too many) close ties to some events in the past.
"Crazy" is only one term you can use.

I think I can say the just about most of the US and parts of the World have everyone who was involved in their thoughts, minds and hearts.

barbino 02-16-2008 11:37 PM

Knowing that there would be a thread on the shooting at NIU on GC, I deliberately gave myself a few days to deal with my emotions before posting. It seems that the older I get, the more emotional I become, and episodes like this can bring it out in all of us. Yes, I know several NIU alums. I could have gone there myself. It's all over the news in Chicago, and every news brief has an update on the story.

The shooting was senseless and tragic - like many others, I am left asking, "Why?" The last news update said that there was no suicide note left by the shooter, and because of this, we may never know what caused him to do this. Right now, I am sadly pondering this last bit of information.

knight_shadow 02-17-2008 12:02 AM

Oops.

LatinaAlumna 02-17-2008 02:38 AM

^They do have a chapter there, but the women involved are from Delta Psi Alpha Co-Ed Fraternity:

http://www.deltapsialpha.com/

knight_shadow 02-17-2008 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LatinaAlumna (Post 1602281)
^They do have a chapter there, but the women involved are from Delta Psi Alpha Co-Ed Fraternity:

http://www.deltapsialpha.com/

I searched for about 3 hours trying to find that link. My mistake!

DSTCHAOS 02-17-2008 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DGTess (Post 1601741)
THIS IS A RANT AGAINST THOSE NANNY-STATE UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS AND LEGISLATORS WHO WOULD MAKE STUDENTS HELPLESS. These students were SHOT, for god's sake. They could do NOTHING to help themselves. They could do NOTHING to help others. They were fish in a barrel

If you want to start a pity-party thread, go ahead. This is a news and politics forum, with a newsworthy event, and legislators who won't protect us.

Administrators and legislators aren't the only reason the gun laws are the way they are. Many students, teachers, and tax payers in general do not think guns should be in the vicinity of educational institutions unless they are in the hands of security and law enforcement officials.

Students, instructors, and administrators are relieved by this because when you make such weapon carrying an option, you are basically forcing everyone else to either pick up arms also or get out of dodge.

DSTCHAOS 02-17-2008 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LPIDelta (Post 1601744)
Tess-- I am actually coming around to your way of thinking. Last semester, some students at the university where I worked wanted to see a change in policy to allow students to carry (legally acquired and permitted) guns on campus, in light of what happened at Virginia Tech. Today I read something that basically said that most gunmen know if they visit a college/university campus, they know that there likely won't be any resistance. But, if they know people carry there, they may think twice. After all, you rarely hear of gun shows being the target of a gunman.

School shootings are still a rarity.

If legislators make gun toting students legal and a potential nonrarity, there may be an increase in gun violence. For every student who claims to want a gun just in case a psycho starts to shoot, there will be a student who has a gun because an instructor pissed them off or because they have been hurt in some way. Let's not increase the gun availability for potential psychos or encourage Rambo students who want to defend campus. There aren't and won't be enough safety measures at schools to account for nonlaw enforcement agents legally having guns on campuses and in classrooms.

DGTess 02-17-2008 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS (Post 1602294)
School shootings are still a rarity.

If legislators make gun toting students legal and a potential nonrarity, there may be an increase in gun violence. For every student who claims to want a gun just in case a psycho starts to shoot, there will be a student who has a gun because an instructor pissed them off or because they have been hurt in some way. Let's not increase the gun availability for potential psychos or encourage Rambo students who want to defend campus. There aren't and won't be enough safety measures at schools to account for nonlaw enforcement agents legally having guns on campuses and in classrooms.

Replace "student" with "citizen" and "campus" or "school" with "Earth". Students who are over 21, have passed the background checks (two - one for the gun purchase and a second for the permit), have taken the required training, and have mentally prepared themselves to carry are permitted to carry on the sidewalk outside the campus, but not across some invisible line.

You can see how well current "policies" and laws work.

DSTCHAOS 02-17-2008 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DGTess (Post 1602372)
Replace "student" with "citizen" and "campus" or "school" with "Earth". Students who are over 21, have passed the background checks (two - one for the gun purchase and a second for the permit), have taken the required training, and have mentally prepared themselves to carry are permitted to carry on the sidewalk outside the campus, but not across some invisible line.

You can see how well current "policies" and laws work.

There's no need to replace anything with anything. Students do not need to carry guns to colleges and universities just like employees do not need to carry guns to work if their jobs do not require gun access.

All this about background checks, training, and mental preparation is a theoretical assumption. In real life, it does not and will not work like that.

Current policies and laws work quite well. School shootings are still a rarity and are not a result of failed gun laws. Some of the general public is just scared now because school shootings have hit too close to home and that fear sensationalizes the issue. I look back to what happened when terrorized citizens bought guns in the 1990s because drug dealers had them (and used them). But gun carrying citizens did not reduce the violence in drug and violence-infested neighborhoods. It increased it, which is one reason why law enforcement began gun buyback programs.

Anyway, none of this matters because students, faculty, and staff in most areas will never be allowed to have guns around or on campuses. That's the reality of the matter.

DeltAlum 02-17-2008 03:44 PM

Agree with Chaos.

shinerbock 02-17-2008 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS (Post 1602386)
There's no need to replace anything with anything. Students do not need to carry guns to colleges and universities just like employees do not need to carry guns to work if their jobs do not require gun access.

All this about background checks, training, and mental preparation is a theoretical assumption. In real life, it does not and will not work like that.

Current policies and laws work quite well. School shootings are still a rarity and are not a result of failed gun laws. Some of the general public is just scared now because school shootings have hit too close to home and that fear sensationalizes the issue. I look back to what happened when terrorized citizens bought guns in the 1990s because drug dealers had them (and used them). But gun carrying citizens did not reduce the violence in drug and violence-infested neighborhoods. It increased it, which is one reason why law enforcement began gun buyback programs.

Anyway, none of this matters because students, faculty, and staff in most areas will never be allowed to have guns around or on campuses. That's the reality of the matter.

Why shouldn't students who can carry guns almost everywhere else...have to abandon that right to pursue higher education. We not only fail to extend that right to college campuses, we advertise that the people gathered on those campuses are unable to defend themselves.

You're right, we shouldn't react to the school shootings by allowing campus carry. We should allow campus carry regardless. Hear a lot of stories about legally carrying citizens killing people at restaurants where they get in a dispute with their server? How about people carrying legally in general? I'll answer that for you, no, you don't.

People aren't going to get licensed to carry so they can pull a gun on a professor they don't like. If they're willing to break that law (murder, brandishing a weapon), they probably don't care about getting in trouble for having a gun on campus in the first place. Thus lies the absurdity of such arguments. People who are going to break the law aren't going to follow campus gun regulations. They already don't. Those who do and are going to follow the law are those who are caught defenseless by those who don't respect "gun free zones."

I don't think campus carry will solve the world's problems. What it will do is keep law-abiding students from being defenseless against those who have no respect for the law in the first place.

DSTCHAOS 02-17-2008 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shinerbock (Post 1602452)
We not only fail to extend that right to college campuses, we advertise that the people gathered on those campuses are unable to defend themselves.

Correct and that's why university and city officials are required to provide security measures. If they aren't doing a good job, force them to hear your voice and do better. Many colleges and universities made a lot of changes after VTech.

Quote:

Originally Posted by shinerbock (Post 1602452)
...they probably don't care about getting in trouble for having a gun on campus in the first place.

Indeed and telling them that they aren't breaking the law by doing so is a facilitating factor that increases criminal opportunities.

ETA: I'm typing about guns on campuses. I have no problem with gun permits as long as people aren't carrying guns where the law forbids (i.e. schools, certain places of employment, etc.--the law forbids it for a reason). I don't want to get into a general "right to bear arms" discussion because I don't see this specific topic as being about the general "right to bear arms."

Quote:

Originally Posted by shinerbock (Post 1602452)
I don't think campus carry will solve the world's problems. What it will do is keep law-abiding students from being defenseless against those who have no respect for the law in the first place.

So who is going to train these wannabe defenders of the Universe? Shooting a human is way different than shooting a board at a gun range or a deer.

Answer: No one. Gun toting students will be the same as gun owning home owners...scared and susceptible to having their guns taken from them and used against them. The average gun advocate may say they have a gun to defend themselves but they really don't expect to have to defend themselves. Plus many with gun permits, particularly in the South, are using it for hunting and that's why they are such gun advocates.

Not to mention that having the guns reduces the potential for conflicts to be resolved without gunfire. Are students allowed to shoot as the potential assailant is walking into the area or walking out of the area (with their backs turned)? For instance, we have established laws for homeowner gun use that are still broken. Imagine what would happen when "defending our property/ourselves" includes untrained students defending themselves and college campuses--you will be unable to retain a lot of student, faculty, and staff if that is allowed.

But it won't be allowed so, again, this is all a theoretical debate. :) People with gun permits will still have to leave their guns at home or in their car, parked the legally mandated miles away from campus.

shinerbock 02-17-2008 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS (Post 1602476)
Correct and that's why university and city officials are required to provide security measures. If they aren't doing a good job, force them to hear your voice and do better. Many colleges and universities made a lot of changes after VTech.

What, an email/text messaging system? That won't help kids already in class. We have security officers at school, and they're worthless (unarmed). I don't depend on the police to defend my family, and I don't think I should have to depend on the school to defend my life either.

I also don't hear a lot of stories about mass school shootings that mainstream America would care about. So I guess that means we need to abandon these types of discussions altogether. The possibility does not render it important.

What? The point is that legally carrying firearms owners are rarely involved in gun crime. Thus, once again, proving the point that the only people who follow "gun free" regulations are the people who will abide by the laws anyway. Gun crime is relatively rare anyway, does this mean we don't need police? The fact that it probably won't happen to me or people I care about doesn't make me more comfortable about the fact that I have no defense against someone who doesn't respect the law like I do.

Indeed and telling them that they aren't breaking the law by doing so is a facilitating factor that increases criminal opportunities.

Again, what? Most people who walk into public places and indiscriminately kill people don't give a damn whether they're licensed to carry. The idea that allowing people to carry legally will encourage criminals to commit atrocious crimes is absurd.


So who is going to train these wannabe defenders of the Universe? Shooting a human is way different than shooting a board at a gun range or a deer.

Answer: No one. Gun toting students will be the same as gun owning home owners...scared and susceptible to having their guns taken from them and used against them.

Many states require training before people can carry concealed. The same rules will apply here. When someone has the goal of killing everyone in the classroom I'm in, I'd rather have someone in their with minimum training who'll make an effort to stop the threat, than having nobody at all. I don't care if the person is an 18 year old girl with a weak grip, what difference does having it taken away make if we're all targets to start with?

Not to mention that having the guns reduces the potential for conflicts to be resolved without gunfire. Are students allowed to shoot as the potential assailant is walking into the area or walking out of the area (with their backs turned)? We have established laws for homeowner gun use that are still broken. Imagine what would happen when "defending our property/ourselves" includes untrained students defending college campuses--you will lose a lot of student, faculty, and staff if that is allowed.

This is an incredibly broad overstatement about something you seem to be unfamiliar with. When people walk into the classroom with several guns, I don't think there is going to be a chance to resolve the situation without gunfire. Every gun owner I know has thought about the subject of "when to act" extensively, and this is why I suggest you're unfamiliar with the subject matter. People who carry concealed go through the effort to do so, I have encountered very few people who are irresponsible and yet jump through the required hoops, pay the required expenses, and go through the required discomfort of carrying concealed. You're saying that because a small minority of people may or may not respond correctly, we should all become unprotected targets for those who choose to break the laws that we abide by? Basically, following the law leaves you extremely vulnerable, and I can't say I agree with this mindset.

But it won't be allowed so, again, this is all a theoretical debate. :)

A couple of states, if I recall correctly, have already passed legislation allowing it. Many others are in the midst of the debate right now. Now, other matter is whether schools will attempt to take away this right which the legislature bestows, but I sincerely hope that they won't.

DSTCHAOS 02-17-2008 05:55 PM

You caught me in the middle of an edit and I don't like in-text replies so I'll address this part first.

Quote:

Originally Posted by shinerbock (Post 1602485)
A couple of states, if I recall correctly, have already passed legislation allowing it. Many others are in the midst of the debate right now. Now, other matter is whether schools will attempt to take away this right which the legislature bestows, but I sincerely hope that they won't.

In the midst of the debate doesn't mean it will happen. :) I hope schools take away those rights if it does happen. Students who want their gun with them as they take lecture notes will have to find a school that allows that nonsense.

DSTCHAOS 02-17-2008 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shinerbock
This is an incredibly broad overstatement about something you seem to be unfamiliar with.

You have no idea how familiar I am with this topic. Just say you disagree, based on your personal opinion and experience. ;) You do realize there's more to these types of debates than your personal opinion and the experiences of you and the people you know, right?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.