GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   Africans are less intelligent than Westerners (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=90997)

DSTCHAOS 10-21-2007 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RACooper (Post 1539864)
Not really true in the world of academia - and in Watson's case I suspect that the only thing keeping him from being completely 'black balled' is the Nobel... and even before this latest comment he was already on the academic fringe in terms of speaking engagements and lectures (particularly in some circles considering the controversy behind whether or not all the work was even his).

Actually, there are academics and scientists who have built their academic reputations off of (what can be interpreted as) bigotry. I mentioned the Social Darwinists Herrnstein and Murray who were loved by many despite the hate of many.

I don't know how the Nobel prize works but I imagine you have to be doing something in the interest of humankind so bigotry isn't a good thing. I can also see why this guy is losing speaking engagements. He's a loose canon.

macallan25 10-22-2007 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Earp (Post 1539028)
Is this supposed to be any where near an inteligent post?

This Week's Irony Overload.

starang21 10-30-2007 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madmax (Post 1538708)
No genetic difference? Is color a genetic difference? I guess you think every race has the same athletic ability also.


Do intelligence tests exist? How do blacks score on those tests?
If I let you design an Afrocentric ebonic million man march intelligence test and Asians would still kick the chit out of blacks on the test. That is life.

yea, i don't get it. white people have generally been lagging behind asians in those standardized tests for a while now. i guess it really is genetic.

madmax 10-31-2007 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starang21 (Post 1543430)
yea, i don't get it. white people have generally been lagging behind asians in those standardized tests for a while now. i guess it really is genetic.


Quote:

Originally Posted by starang21 (Post 411684)
filipino is technically in the pacific islander category. we're not hispanic, even if the spaniards were the ones who "discovered" us. technically we're not asian, because of where the actually country is located. but oh well, anyhow lori is fine....


You are not asian. If you were included you probably held down the average. Do people still eat dogs in your country?

starang21 10-31-2007 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madmax (Post 1543868)
You are not asian. If you were included you probably held down the average. Do people still eat dogs in your country?

yes i am. last time i checked, asian/pacific islander was still a category on the census. i guess that entitles me to kick white people's asses in standardized test because i'm genetically smarter because i'm asian. it explains so much, but i never wanted to hurt inferior people like you. that also means that you're beneath me because you're severly less intelligent.

do you still count with all of your fingers and toes? that kind of thing happens with inbreeding in the mountains.

but i do enjoy the fact that you were smart enough to use the search function. does that mean you're IQ is higher than 70?

DSTCHAOS 11-01-2007 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starang21 (Post 1543430)
yea, i don't get it. white people have generally been lagging behind asians in those standardized tests for a while now. i guess it really is genetic.

Hey. ;)

starang21 11-01-2007 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS (Post 1544295)
Hey. ;)

hi.

:flowers:

<=== bringing TBT to GC

AKA_Monet 11-01-2007 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS (Post 1539916)
Actually, there are academics and scientists who have built their academic reputations off of (what can be interpreted as) bigotry. I mentioned the Social Darwinists Herrnstein and Murray who were loved by many despite the hate of many.

I don't know how the Nobel prize works but I imagine you have to be doing something in the interest of humankind so bigotry isn't a good thing. I can also see why this guy is losing speaking engagements. He's a loose canon.

So a little medical genetic education.

Lately, LOTS of studies are showing that rearing humans in impoverished environments, i.e. poor food sources as infants, lack of instruction and nurturing and harangued harassment/lack of opportunities as one gets older causes significant health debilities as one ages.

So, Watson, who received the Nobel Prize in 1953 with Francis Crick for discovering the structure of DNA by X-ray crystallography, made a huge leap and bound because most of the impoverished countries on the planet according to him are thought to be in Africa.

However, research has shown that to be inaccurate and foolish. While there are a number of countries in Africa whose populations are in poor health, there are several other countries, some who hide their sick from public view that equally have poor health which those who are colorstruck often ignore. North Korea and parts of China are notorious in hiding their infirmed population from world view.

From a global health perspective, as humankind, we all should attempt to improve health environments for ALL children and parents. As long as we have screwball academicians that throw poorly investigated propaganda against large groups of people in the name of science and medical genetics who have notable accolades, we will never evolve. Period.

Survival of the fittest means, we are only as strong as our weakest...

AKA_Monet 12-12-2007 04:12 AM

AT ITS BEST!!! TURNABOUT IS FAIR PLAY!!!
 
Revealed: scientist who sparked racism row has black genes
By Robert Verkaik
Published: 10 December 2007

A Nobel Prize-winning scientist who provoked a public outcry by claiming black Africans were less intelligent than whites has a DNA profile with up to 16 times more genes of black origin than the average white European.

An analysis of the genome of James Watson showed that 16 per cent of his genes were likely to have come from a black ancestor of African descent. By contrast, most people of European descent would have no more than 1 per cent.


Read the rest of the article here

:D

nikki1920 12-12-2007 12:17 PM

Karma!

nittanyalum 12-12-2007 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikki1920 (Post 1562060)
Karma!

...ain't it a b*tch?!? :) Tee hee!!

KSig RC 12-12-2007 05:02 PM

Well, in kind of a jacked-up way, everyone who called him an ignorant old douche bag for spouting this kind of nonsense accidentally and ironically supported his original thesis . . . my head is about to explode.

1908Revelations 12-12-2007 05:54 PM

I guess that is another reason for him to dispell his original thesis huh?

RACooper 12-13-2007 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KSig RC (Post 1562233)
Well, in kind of a jacked-up way, everyone who called him an ignorant old douche bag for spouting this kind of nonsense accidentally and ironically supported his original thesis . . . my head is about to explode.

Being ignorant has nothing to do with being intelligent or unintelligent ;)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.