GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Risk Management - Hazing & etc. (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   Five Towson Sororities on Probation (Alcohol) (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=90890)

Just interested 10-14-2007 09:37 PM

I am wondering AXiDGirl10, what was the dividing line between probation and sanctioned? Obviously, no one group was totally not involved. I suspect, from what little I know, that National Panhellenic will investigate the situation.

As far as probation or even being sanctioned, that little bit of punishment shouldn't worry these girls as much as when their National organization gets a hold of them. I won't be pretty. There should be no excuses. If this is a school of "maybe joiners"
then maybe they don't need to have National Panhellenic groups on their campus

violetpretty 10-14-2007 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just interested (Post 1537411)
If this is a school of "maybe joiners"
then maybe they don't need to have National Panhellenic groups on their campus

Excuse me? Are you implying that NPC groups are only for Southern Belles bred to rush? Just because schools in the North aren't full of women who have been primed for recruitment since conception doesn't mean that NPC groups aren't valuable, needed, and enjoyed up here. I myself was a maybe joiner. Tons of women at my school are maybe joiners, and many of them are won over once they actually go through recruitment. Just because someone is a "maybe joiner" doesn't mean they're going to be less committed. It could just mean that all they know of sororities are stereotypes and need convincing that a sorority is a good investment of time.

AOIIAngel, I didn't read I Heart Recruitment, but maybe it was in a review or summary of it that I read that most schools have 10% "always joiners", 10% "never joiners", and 80% "maybe joiners". The key is winning over the maybe joiners.

AOII Angel 10-15-2007 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by violetpretty (Post 1537420)
AOIIAngel, I didn't read I Heart Recruitment, but maybe it was in a review or summary of it that I read that most schools have 10% "always joiners", 10% "never joiners", and 80% "maybe joiners". The key is winning over the maybe joiners.

I loved this discussion in the book. Unfortunately, widespread sanctioning of Greeks will only drive away these people who fit into the "maybe joiners" group. I'm hoping Panhel can get together to improve the image of Greeks on campus at Towson. These groups have so much to offer, and Bid Day antics are such a small part of the picture, but it is beginning to overwhelm the positives of Greek life.

A strong panhellenic presence will help all of the chapters on campus. Hopefully, activities will be a little more circumspect, dirty rushing will be eliminated and rules will be enforced consistently. Of course, ignorance is never an acceptable excuse for breaking the rules, but rules being broken in such a widespread manner indicates major problems at a much higher level than the individual chapters. I'm staying positive that this campus will make the necessary changes to improve the status of Greek organizations so that the negative stories aren't the only stories heard by the public.

fyrnymph 10-15-2007 08:54 AM

Quote - I suspect, from what little I know, that National Panhellenic will investigate the situation. Unquote.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not believe NPC has an investigatory function. The local Panhellenic may, and the university certainly should, conduct an investigation, but to the best of my knowledge the NPC as a body doesn't work like that. The fact that the GLOs are NPC means that the groups have a national headquarters that I am sure is VERY interested in making sure the groups follow the rules from here on out. Were they local groups, that would not be the case.

I hope the groups use this as an opportunity to focus on their sisterhood, and to come back from this unfortunate event stronger and more focused on what is really important.

BabyPiNK_FL 10-15-2007 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by violetpretty (Post 1537329)
There are at least three reasons why this would be silly at Towson:

1. Sororities at Towson do not have chapter houses. It's not like you'd have a Rho Chi living with 80 of her sisters.
2. School is in session during recruitment. These women have other things to do with their lives other than recruitment.
3. Since school is in session, the only place to put the Rho Chis would be a hotel. That cost would probably get passed to the PNMs in the form of a hefty registration fee. A lot of women who join sororities up here are "maybe joiners", and a high fee will drive away a lot of "maybes".

OMG! Everyone keeps PMing me about this so to set the record straight:
1) My campus has NO sorority housing
2) School IS in session during our recruitment (it's hectic but we manage)
3) We DO stay in a hotel, there were 29 (Rho Gammas & Pi Chis) and our fee is only $30 (non-refundable) and we also provide dinners on the nights of recruitment for the Rho Gammas, Pi Chi and the staff that helps us and dinner on pref night for the PNMs as well.

Everyone kept assuming that we had housing for some reason...

violetpretty 10-15-2007 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BabyPiNK_FL (Post 1537666)
OMG! Everyone keeps PMing me about this so to set the record straight:
1) My campus has NO sorority housing
2) School IS in session during our recruitment (it's hectic but we manage)
3) We DO stay in a hotel, there were 29 (Rho Gammas & Pi Chis) and our fee is only $30 (non-refundable) and we also provide dinners on the nights of recruitment for the Rho Gammas, Pi Chi and the staff that helps us and dinner on pref night for the PNMs as well.

Everyone kept assuming that we had housing for some reason...

So where does the money come from for the Pi Chis to stay in the hotels? Do the Pi Chis pay for it out of pocket? Does it come from a fee that every chapter pays per Pi Chi? Does PHA pay for it?

I don't think it's necessary to have the Pi Chis locked up like nuns in a convent during recruitment week. Is dirty rushing really that huge of a problem? Tons of schools have their recruitment counselors live in their normal accomodations (even in their chapter houses if that is where they live) without problems.

Back to the original topic, I would be really surprised if the Rho Chis at Towson and any other chapter members honestly had no idea that they were not supposed to be drinking on bid day. I think the problem stems more from the fact that because it was a "tradition" that had gone unpunished in the past, no one (including the Greek advisor) took the NPC Unanimous Agreement seriously until someone got a concussion. I am just wondering why anyone would want to drink on bid day. It's one of the most fun days of the year/semester that one does not need alcohol to enjoy herself.

irishpipes 10-15-2007 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by violetpretty (Post 1537692)
I am just wondering why anyone would want to drink on bid day. It's one of the most fun days of the year/semester that one does not need alcohol to enjoy herself.

/someone who pledged after the truly fun bid days of the past :)

PiPhiERDoc 10-15-2007 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishpipes (Post 1537822)
/someone who pledged after the truly fun bid days of the past :)

LOL - I'm glad someone else said it so I didn't have to incriminate myself...:D

ForeverRoses 10-16-2007 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by violetpretty (Post 1537692)
So where does the money come from for the Pi Chis to stay in the hotels? Do the Pi Chis pay for it out of pocket? Does it come from a fee that every chapter pays per Pi Chi? Does PHA pay for it?

...

. It's one of the most fun days of the year/semester that one does not need alcohol to enjoy herself.

My school always put the Rho Chis and the exec members that disaffiliated up in hotels. It wasn't so much to prevent dirty rushing as it was to keep the PNMs from finding out their affiliation. After all, if you saw your Rho Chi walking into a sorority house after class, it would be easy to figure out her affiliation.

Back in the day (1993) we paid $25 for rush. Each chapter had 3 Rho Chis (11 chapters) plus 1 member of exec. So 44 women to put up in a hotel. Each Rho Chi group was assigned to a room (3 women from different chapters in each group). So figure 14 hotel rooms for 1 week (okay 8 days). Most hotels (especially in a college town during a non-event week) will give you a block of rooms for a lower price.

We had about 50 girls per Rho Chi group to start out with, so with each of them paying $25 you have $1250 per group, the hotel cost was about $75 a night for one room- you would need that for 8 days- so your cost is $600 for the week in the hotel. Plus you still have $650 to pay for the exec room, the favor given to all rushees on pref night (a water bottle the year I rushed) and other incidentals.

It was completely doable.

As for the not drinking on bid day, well it's a good thing they didn't have facebook when I was in college (but at least we waited until AFTER the official stuff was over)

AOII Angel 10-16-2007 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishpipes (Post 1537822)
Originally Posted by violetpretty http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/im...s/viewpost.gif
I am just wondering why anyone would want to drink on bid day. It's one of the most fun days of the year/semester that one does not need alcohol to enjoy herself.
/someone who pledged after the truly fun bid days of the past :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by PiPhiERDoc (Post 1537828)
LOL - I'm glad someone else said it so I didn't have to incriminate myself...:D


I don't know when the rule started prohibiting drinking on Bid Day...we were never told there was a prohibition. Actually, the fraternities used to throw bid night parties to celebrate the event. All of the sorority members would show up in their bid day shirts and party. My bid day was the last year this was allowed, so maybe 1994 was the cut off. Of course, at the time the drinking age in Louisiana was 18 so the problem of underage drinking was not so big in our state. I was only 17 so I guess I broke the law.:p

AlphaFrog 10-16-2007 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverRoses (Post 1538065)
After all, if you saw your Rho Chi walking into a sorority house after class, it would be easy to figure out her affiliation.



Random, and probably dumb question, but are there any campuses that have the Rho Chis live in other sororities houses? As in, if there were 5 XYZ RhoChis and 5 ABC Rho Chis, the XYZ Rho Chis would live in ABC's house and the ABCs would live in XYZ's house?? I know there are all sorts of logistical problems with that scenario, but I can't say that it would be completely impossible.

FSUZeta 10-16-2007 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AOII Angel (Post 1538069)
I don't know when the rule started prohibiting drinking on Bid Day...we were never told there was a prohibition. Actually, the fraternities used to throw bid night parties to celebrate the event. All of the sorority members would show up in their bid day shirts and party. My bid day was the last year this was allowed, so maybe 1994 was the cut off. Of course, at the time the drinking age in Louisiana was 18 so the problem of underage drinking was not so big in our state. I was only 17 so I guess I broke the law.:p


and the npc rule now is no alcohol or boys.

Unregistered- 10-16-2007 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AOII Angel (Post 1538069)
I don't know when the rule started prohibiting drinking on Bid Day...we were never told there was a prohibition. Actually, the fraternities used to throw bid night parties to celebrate the event. All of the sorority members would show up in their bid day shirts and party. My bid day was the last year this was allowed, so maybe 1994 was the cut off. Of course, at the time the drinking age in Louisiana was 18 so the problem of underage drinking was not so big in our state. I was only 17 so I guess I broke the law.:p

Quote:

Originally Posted by FSUZeta (Post 1538241)
and the npc rule now is no alcohol or boys.

I couldn't find a source on the official NPC website, but a Google search on NPC+alcohol+bid day came up with a word document from the College of William and Mary's Inter-Sorority Association from 2005.

If the website is indeed factual, then

Quote:

6. Following the 1991 NPC Rush Resolution, there are to be no men and/or alcohol involved in a chapter’s Bid Day celebrations or celebrations sponsored by individual members of the organization. Bid Day Celebrations will be considered any chapter/sister activity that begin between the extending of bids and 8:00am the morning following Bid Day.
I'm sure the date's somewhere in the Green Book (for whoever has a copy handy).

blackngoldengrl 10-16-2007 05:57 PM

They've got this Towson story on the local news. Talk about bad PR. You think the cameras will show up when the groups do their campus philanthropies?

ETA: Well they did show a brief NPC-wide jeans give-away for those in need ( I guess) of jeans. They also interviewed a Phi Mu sister who stated that GLO members contribute the most service and raise the most money for the community.

violetpretty 10-16-2007 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishpipes (Post 1537822)
/someone who pledged after the truly fun bid days of the past :)

Has bid day changed that much since 2004?

violetpretty 10-16-2007 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverRoses (Post 1538065)
My school always put the Rho Chis and the exec members that disaffiliated up in hotels. It wasn't so much to prevent dirty rushing as it was to keep the PNMs from finding out their affiliation. After all, if you saw your Rho Chi walking into a sorority house after class, it would be easy to figure out her affiliation.

The chapter houses are not close to where most PNMs live, but if they wanted to camp out and see who lives where, I suppose they could. With the advents of facebook, google, etc. if a PNM is absolutely determined to find out a Rho Gamma's affiliation, she'll find out. A couple of mine figured me out because they found a picture of me in the Sigma Kappa Triangle (obviously something I had no control over). A few more figured it out because they saw a picture of me in a scrapbook. My face was covered, but they could see my hair and they were like "You're the only RG with short brown hair."

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverRoses (Post 1538065)
We had about 50 girls per Rho Chi group to start out with, so with each of them paying $25 you have $1250 per group, the hotel cost was about $75 a night for one room- you would need that for 8 days- so your cost is $600 for the week in the hotel. Plus you still have $650 to pay for the exec room, the favor given to all rushees on pref night (a water bottle the year I rushed) and other incidentals.

What's the point of even having Rho Chis if there are 50 of them in a group?!?!:eek: That defeats the point of having any personal attention!

irishpipes 10-16-2007 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by violetpretty (Post 1538292)
Has bid day changed that much since 2004?


It has changed monumentally since 1987.

ForeverRoses 10-17-2007 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by violetpretty (Post 1538300)
The chapter houses are not close to where most PNMs live, but if they wanted to camp out and see who lives where, I suppose they could. With the advents of facebook, google, etc. if a PNM is absolutely determined to find out a Rho Gamma's affiliation, she'll find out. A couple of mine figured me out because they found a picture of me in the Sigma Kappa Triangle (obviously something I had no control over). A few more figured it out because they saw a picture of me in a scrapbook. My face was covered, but they could see my hair and they were like "You're the only RG with short brown hair."



What's the point of even having Rho Chis if there are 50 of them in a group?!?!:eek: That defeats the point of having any personal attention!

Our sorority houses are across the street or down the street from main campus buildings including several large classroom buildings, so non-greeks are constantly walking past the houses.

As for 50 PNMs in a rush group- we had three rush counselors in every group, so that is about 16 PNMs for every Rho Chi/Gamma/ Chi. So we had plenty of personal attention.

Plus, since the Rho Chis were staying in hotels, we were given their phone number and we could call them at any time (this was before cell phones).

AOII Angel 10-17-2007 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OTW (Post 1538250)
I couldn't find a source on the official NPC website, but a Google search on NPC+alcohol+bid day came up with a word document from the College of William and Mary's Inter-Sorority Association from 2005.

If the website is indeed factual, then

Quote:
6. Following the 1991 NPC Rush Resolution, there are to be no men and/or alcohol involved in a chapter’s Bid Day celebrations or celebrations sponsored by individual members of the organization. Bid Day Celebrations will be considered any chapter/sister activity that begin between the extending of bids and 8:00am the morning following Bid Day.

I'm sure the date's somewhere in the Green Book (for whoever has a copy handy).

I'm surprised to hear this was changed in 1991. Our Panhellenic advisor was a major stickler for rules, but she didn't make us change until 1994. After that point there were no boys or alcohol on bid day, which really made bid day more about sisterhood anyway. Also, this is a very vague rule..."sponsored celebrations" leaves a lot to the imagination. This doesn't sound like it forbids individual sisters of legal drinking age of imbibing if they do not "sponsor" the celebration with their other sisters. Of course, the Towson situation involved drinking on campus which is a completely different rule.

33girl 10-17-2007 11:19 AM

In the olden days, most of the sororities on my campus had a mixer on pledge pickup/bid day - we preferred to have a party as then if the girls had boyfriends or other people they wanted to share the event with them, they could invite them over with no problem. I've always thought it was kind of silly to go straight to a mixer with a bunch of dudes you don't know - I think this was the main reason NPC got rid of it. It took the focus off sisterhood and put it on OMG THAT SIGMA CHI WITH TEH BLUE SHIRT ON IS REALLY CUTE.

But of course, as far as parties or mixers are concerned - all they have to do is wait until the day after Bid Day to hold it.

ladygreek 10-17-2007 12:25 PM

Will someone either PM me and give me a synopsis on what is a recruitment counselor or refer me to a link.

AlphaFrog 10-17-2007 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladygreek (Post 1538594)
Will someone either PM me and give me a synopsis on what is a recruitment counselor or refer me to a link.

They are sorority women who "disaffiliate" (as to be impartial) for a few weeks to help the girls through rush.

TSteven 10-17-2007 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 33girl (Post 1538559)
In the olden days, most of the sororities on my campus had a mixer on pledge pickup/bid day - we preferred to have a party as then if the girls had boyfriends or other people they wanted to share the event with them, they could invite them over with no problem. I've always thought it was kind of silly to go straight to a mixer with a bunch of dudes you don't know - I think this was the main reason NPC got rid of it. It took the focus off sisterhood and put it on OMG THAT SIGMA CHI WITH TEH BLUE SHIRT ON IS REALLY CUTE.

But of course, as far as parties or mixers are concerned - all they have to do is wait until the day after Bid Day to hold it.

That was you? :cool:

SydneyK 10-17-2007 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AOII Angel (Post 1536652)
Each chapter should be held responsible, but so should the university and panhellenic advisor who have the authority in this situation.

Each chapter is being held responsible, hence the probations. And unless you're privy to private discussions amongst the university and its employees, you're probably unaware of what repercussions the panhellenic adviser is facing. It seems, from what little info I have to go on, the university is making a smart move by placing certain chapters on probation. And if the chapters in question were identified (at least in part) because of pictures on facebook, then perhaps these chapters will learn to represent themselves a little more smartly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AOII Angel (Post 1536652)
I just find it unreasonable to ruin the first year for the NMs who were punished twice by ruining their bid day with drunk recruitment counselors then ruining their year with probations.

It's unfair for you to hold the university responsible for "ruining" the NMs' experiences. The university didn't force the recruitment counselors to drink. NMs have only their drunk counselors to thank for that (if, in fact, NMs would say that their Bid Day was ruined because their counselors were drunk). Regarding the NMs year being ruined because of probations... well, the probation is in effect until, what?, Spring Break? So, that's roughly five calendar months. One of those months is winter break, so there's really no loss there. So, they're really looking at four months of no mixers/formals. For this kind of infraction, I'm inclined to think that four months is quite lenient.

I understand that it's a bad situation. But until I find out more about what actually happened, and based on what I've read so far, I'm supportive of the university's decision. It'll be interesting to see what, if anything, NPC has to say about this.

Tom Earp 10-17-2007 03:23 PM

"If" and I say if this happened then the blame is there for the Advisers and the members, they knew the rules.

If they were in violation then whose fault is it?

macallan25 10-17-2007 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Earp (Post 1538675)
"If" and I say if this happened then the blame is there for the Advisers and the members, they knew the rules.

If they were in violation then whose fault is it?


I'm Ron Burgundy?

fantASTic 10-18-2007 12:22 AM

You know, the more I read about this, the more I think it's just. They knew it was wrong - whether it was tradition or not. Hazing is a tradition in many chapters and schools, yet we all know it's wrong. If we choose to do it, we must be prepared to accept the consequences. These women represent their sorority, and all the sororities deserve to be punished.

Greek Life cannot afford to keep around schools which flaunt the rules like this. It becomes a liability as opposed to a benefit.

AOII Angel 10-18-2007 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SydneyK (Post 1538639)
Each chapter is being held responsible, hence the probations. And unless you're privy to private discussions amongst the university and its employees, you're probably unaware of what repercussions the panhellenic adviser is facing. It seems, from what little info I have to go on, the university is making a smart move by placing certain chapters on probation. And if the chapters in question were identified (at least in part) because of pictures on facebook, then perhaps these chapters will learn to represent themselves a little more smartly.



It's unfair for you to hold the university responsible for "ruining" the NMs' experiences. The university didn't force the recruitment counselors to drink. NMs have only their drunk counselors to thank for that (if, in fact, NMs would say that their Bid Day was ruined because their counselors were drunk). Regarding the NMs year being ruined because of probations... well, the probation is in effect until, what?, Spring Break? So, that's roughly five calendar months. One of those months is winter break, so there's really no loss there. So, they're really looking at four months of no mixers/formals. For this kind of infraction, I'm inclined to think that four months is quite lenient.

I understand that it's a bad situation. But until I find out more about what actually happened, and based on what I've read so far, I'm supportive of the university's decision. It'll be interesting to see what, if anything, NPC has to say about this.

I don't know how the university is dealing with their own employees...that is the problem. For the university to pretend that the chapters on this campus are the only problems in this situation is ridiculous! They have done everything they can to paint these chapters as rogue groups breaking rules that have been strictly enforced which is far from the truth. If they want to publicize this incident, they should publicize the whole truth. This event did not occur in a vacuum. My opinion is that everything that led up to this event occurring should be aired so that it doesn't happen again. The university apparently doesn't care about the bad press to the sororities and their (inter)national groups, but they won't accept the bad press that they deserve as well. As for the NMs, the recruitment counselors were definitely the cause of any ruined bid day experiences, but again, this didn't occur without the knowledge and implied consent of the panhellenic advisor. I think they were all wrong in this event. I certainly don't condone underage drinking or drinking on campus. These women made very poor decisions, but I don't feel their sisters are the cause of this or are guilty of the offense. We don't punish family members for the offenses of their children/siblings, etc. Why is an entire organization guilty for the offenses of a single member? Where does this stop? Are the sisters from another campus to blame as well? The (inter)national organization?

SydneyK 10-18-2007 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AOII Angel (Post 1538949)
I don't know how the university is dealing with their own employees...that is the problem.

That really isn't any of your business. If the Panhellenic Adviser is fired, you'll be made aware of it, even if only by seeing the advertisement for his/her replacement. But aside from that, employee discipline generally isn't public, and for good reason.

AlphaXi4983 10-19-2007 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fantASTic (Post 1538893)
You know, the more I read about this, the more I think it's just. They knew it was wrong - whether it was tradition or not. Hazing is a tradition in many chapters and schools, yet we all know it's wrong. If we choose to do it, we must be prepared to accept the consequences. These women represent their sorority, and all the sororities deserve to be punished.

Greek Life cannot afford to keep around schools which flaunt the rules like this. It becomes a liability as opposed to a benefit.

This is not a new problem at Towson. It was a problem when I pledged, it was a problem before I was there, it was a widely known (within the greek system) problem when I was active, it's just that no one did anything about it. One of my sisters was rushed to the hospital on Bid Day for almost the exact same reasons as we saw this Bid Day. It was common knowledge that Rho Chis showed up to the field drunk, many of the sisters drank before and I'm sure there were even pledges that did the same. I know of at least once incident where sisters of one of the sororities would drink in the garage before bid day and not even get caught. The girls knew it was wrong - they're not stupid, they just don't expect to get caught becuase Towson has been, in my opinion, notoriously flawed in dealing with issues in the Greek system unless the national gets involved.

The reason they got caught this time? They were stupid enough to post pictures of themselves drinking on Bid Night on Facebook. Really now - how dumb can you be? We were always told that any Bid Day activities were to be dry. The rush process is going to be dry. Did people drink? Yes. But we didn't have Facebook to post it on. They were wrong. They know it. They're just pissed they got caught and called out on it. And I'm not just talking about the 5 on probation - I'm talking about all 8, my chapter included. Kudos to Towson for finally having the balls to act. I whole-heartedly support their decisions.

Just interested 10-19-2007 08:31 PM

Amen

JaimeNicole 10-21-2007 11:47 AM

[QUOTE=blackngoldengrl;1536852]
Quote:

Originally Posted by BabyPiNK_FL (Post 1536777)
This is

This is Maryland. We don't do rush that way, as in before school starts and all. Even at the University of Maryland, it isn't done this way. And not all the sisters live in the house either.



Maryland does not provide housing because recruitment (formal and informal) occurs while school is in session. No need for special accommodations..... We also allow recruitment counselors to live in the chapter house - most just use back doors. Our greek housing is so far from freshmen housing, a PNM would have to be extremely stalkerish to figure out where the recruitment counselors lived.

33girl 10-21-2007 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlphaXi4983 (Post 1539620)
This is not a new problem at Towson. It was a problem when I pledged, it was a problem before I was there, it was a widely known (within the greek system) problem when I was active, it's just that no one did anything about it. One of my sisters was rushed to the hospital on Bid Day for almost the exact same reasons as we saw this Bid Day. It was common knowledge that Rho Chis showed up to the field drunk, many of the sisters drank before and I'm sure there were even pledges that did the same. I know of at least once incident where sisters of one of the sororities would drink in the garage before bid day and not even get caught. The girls knew it was wrong - they're not stupid, they just don't expect to get caught becuase Towson has been, in my opinion, notoriously flawed in dealing with issues in the Greek system unless the national gets involved.

The reason they got caught this time? They were stupid enough to post pictures of themselves drinking on Bid Night on Facebook. Really now - how dumb can you be? We were always told that any Bid Day activities were to be dry. The rush process is going to be dry. Did people drink? Yes. But we didn't have Facebook to post it on. They were wrong. They know it. They're just pissed they got caught and called out on it. And I'm not just talking about the 5 on probation - I'm talking about all 8, my chapter included. Kudos to Towson for finally having the balls to act. I whole-heartedly support their decisions.


I'm sorry, but I have a giant problem giving "kudos" to a school that knew this was going on for years, to the point of people getting rushed to the hospital, and the only reason they used any discipline is because pictures showed up on Facebook. That sounds an awful lot like "do things that might be injurious to yourselves or others, things that are against your national rules, as long as you don't embarrass the school."

AOII Angel, I agree w/ everything you said.

AlphaXi4983 10-21-2007 09:26 PM

The problem is, even if the school knows its going on, it can be hard to take action until they have tangible proof that it's going on - and what better way than sisters self-incriminating by handing out photos for the world to see? There have been cases where the university has taken action against individuals or even certain chapters, but this if the first time (that I know of) where it has been addressed as a wide-spread problem.

33girl 10-21-2007 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlphaXi4983 (Post 1540111)
The problem is, even if the school knows its going on, it can be hard to take action until they have tangible proof that it's going on - and what better way than sisters self-incriminating by handing out photos for the world to see? There have been cases where the university has taken action against individuals or even certain chapters, but this if the first time (that I know of) where it has been addressed as a wide-spread problem.

A member having to go to the HOSPITAL isn't tangible proof??

And for what it's worth, photos can be altered or doctored. I would find them the least credible thing to hang something on, and one of these days that's going to happen - photoshopped photos online expressly to get a group in trouble and the group fights it.

AlphaXi4983 10-22-2007 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 33girl (Post 1540119)
A member having to go to the HOSPITAL isn't tangible proof??

And for what it's worth, photos can be altered or doctored. I would find them the least credible thing to hang something on, and one of these days that's going to happen - photoshopped photos online expressly to get a group in trouble and the group fights it.

No one did a did a breathalyzer test on her or the other girls involved - it looked like just an accident and they (the university and the EMS) treated it as such. Photos have been used as evidence in legal trials for decades. Even though Photoshop is more prevalent now than in past eras, photos are still often highly regarded as evidence, along with witness testimony. All evidence is falliable.

MaggieXi 10-22-2007 01:44 PM

Can I ask who exposed these photos? I'm only asking because I find it surprising that actives would have public profiles for anyone to go in and look at their pictures. Especially if it is during recruitment!

Unregistered- 10-22-2007 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaggieXi (Post 1540377)
Can I ask who exposed these photos? I'm only asking because I find it surprising that actives would have public profiles for anyone to go in and look at their pictures. Especially if it is during recruitment!

If these girls are stupid enough to drink on Bid Day, I doubt they'd apply any common sense to making their FaceBook pictures private. :rolleyes:

Drolefille 10-22-2007 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaggieXi (Post 1540377)
Can I ask who exposed these photos? I'm only asking because I find it surprising that actives would have public profiles for anyone to go in and look at their pictures. Especially if it is during recruitment!

Don't bring logic into this! Next you're going to say that people wouldn't post any pictures of illicit or illegal activity on the internet!

AlphaXi4983 10-22-2007 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drolefille (Post 1540382)
Don't bring logic into this! Next you're going to say that people wouldn't post any pictures of illicit or illegal activity on the internet!

Hahaha, a lot of the girls actually have been good about making their profiles private, but not all of them do, and not all of them restrict their pictures, especially if they're posted by someone else. I don't know who went to the University, or if the University took the initiative themselves to look up profiles of members and new members. I've heard several stories, but I don't know which is true (if any).


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.