![]() |
I love you boo.:D:p:rolleyes::)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I agree. My * hopeful* idea for the upcoming year is that the MITs will still do the fund raiser but the "gift" that they give will be strongly recommended send will be to send the money raised to either SAI philanthropies or a philanthropy of their choice. That will give them experience running a fund raiser, dealing with the aftermath AND figuring out how to give a donation (which is more compicated for many organizations than I would have thought) I would like to set out guidelines for the gift, i agree that no one wants to participate in a fund raiser to buy sorority girls more stuff ;) In the future I think that a designation between the gift and the fund raiser would be good. We were told to fund raise for the gift, (which after all of the drama ended up being a measly clock and plaque) ad that is completely useless for training purposes. However, learning how to budget and chose a philanthropy for a fund raiser (if not a philanthropy, a concrete thing) might help teach them something.
Thoughts? |
My Finance Advisor's 2 cents:
While I'm happy you were eventually reimbursed, this whole situation was handled badly from the getgo. A fundraising activity often has initial expenses. Those expenses should be reimbursed either by the organizers (in this case the new members) and/or by the proceeds from the event. Anything left over is the "profit" and can then be used for this gift. Any "loss" should be shared equally by the organizers. Morals of this story:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That being said, I CAN understand if, perhaps, the chapter were going to reimburse her the money, and then charge the pledge class members the fair portion of the money (for example, if each new member was supposed to pitch in $20, then the chapter would take on the debt, but charge the new members $20 each to cover that debt...) |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.