epchick |
04-21-2006 05:54 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by PhiMuAmberkins
Just my two cents...
"Mrs. Bailey feels an obligation to travel from her home in suburban Lynnfield, Mass., to a federal courtroom in Boston, where 9/11 families can watch the Moussaoui trial on closed-circuit television..."
-I feel about this like I feel about television. If you don't like it, don't watch it. If it makes you upset, yet you still go and watch the trial, don't bitch to anyone about it, because it's your choice.
Also, the part about the "town meeting" kind of upset me. This woman seems to think that it isn't important for us to understand why we're hated, why others would WANT to bomb us. This kind of blind hatred/patriotism/trusting of the government/ignorance to anyone else is BAD. I'd much rather know why this happened than have a meeting where we talk about how we're right, they're wrong, and that's all there is.
I don't want to sound like I don't think 9/11 was a tragedy and a terrible thing. I'm just saying that these people are not making a whole lot of sense in their objections. I don't know how I'd feel if a former Taliban official came to my school...I'm just putting in my 2 cents...
|
I totally understand. I also feel that we should understand why we are hated and why other would want to bomb us, but the fact that Yale did it 4 days after the 9/11 attacks is in poor taste. No, it more than just poor taste, it is wrong!! I was shock about the 9/11 attack for at least a week, and I didn't have any family near there. Now to think if i had family, i'd probably still be devastated. It was wrong of Yale to invite the family members of the victims to a meeting to explain, "you know your husband/dad/wife/sister/brother died because of the US..blah blah blah" Yeah, people need to know why, but not then! That was not the time.
But just because this man is in America, DOES NOT mean that Yale has to accept him. To give the man the "benefit of the doubt" is kinda wrong. I understand that maybe he is completely innocent, but you really want to risk it? Who knows, he might be genuine in wanting to take classes here, OR he might want to orchistrate more attacks here. Do you want to take the risk?
I might have felt better with this situation if the guy actually had remorse for his involvement, but the fact that he isn't repentant/remorseful or anything really concerns me. Who are we to say that he is a "former" taliban member. Just because the taliban is "broken up" DOES NOT mean that they are gone. They just have secret meetings, the members don't publicly announce their Taliban membership anymore. Its just like I believe that there is no such thing as a "former gang member" once your in a gang, your in it for life. If you want to "get out" you can't, you can walk away from it and not participate in it anymore, but you are still IN the gang. This guy is still IN the Taliban whether it is broken up or not.
Just on a little side note, i find it very interesting that the government will allow Taliban members to enter the US, but they won't allow immigrants to enter. Hmmmm, there is something a littl wrong with that :confused: ---of course that is a whole other issue altogether.
|