Re: Re: Re: Why Conservatives Are Smarter
 

P.P.S.- Posting copyrighted text is also against the TOS, as you've been told a number of times, but yet you continue to do so

Re: Re: Re: Re: Why Conservatives Are Smarter
 

Do you feel people have the right to post his name because he posts articles? If not, don't link the two together.

Also, unless I'm remembering incorrectly, you defended zntke when he was posting copyrighted info. John never quite resolved that. Is posting a blurb not posting copyrighted info? I'm not quite sure that jives. I am happy to see your attitude show flexibility and change your opinion on it.

-Rudey
--Defending the little guy since the beginning of time.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why Conservatives Are Smarter
 

Personally I feel that people have the legal right to post his name for multiple reasons, but I respect John's wishes.

I believe you're remembering incorrectly. I'm 99.9% positive i've never defended posting copyrighted articles. And John has recently stated that cutting and pasting copyrighted articles is NOT acceptable, and it's a clear violation of the TOS. And hoosier has been informed of that.

-Since when is hoosier a little guy? I guess until he makes an anti-Semitic comment.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why Conservatives Are Smarter
 

Dani his name has nothing to do with copyrighted material. Nothing.

I am pretty sure I remember correctly unless there was another KD in law school that acted like you.

You constantly get into pissing matches, act heinous towards people, and act like you're some white knight.

What does anti-semitic comments have to do with anything? Perhaps you should explain yourself.

Your line of thinking is ridiculous. I cannot imagine what kind of law firm you work for or what poor souls benefit from it, but wow.

Listen, if you want to push it with me go ahead. But now go ahead and explain the anti-semitic thing.

-Rudey

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why Conservatives Are Smarter
 

Feel free to find me the post where I supported it. If you do, I will be happy to own up to it. Even to humor you, i've done a search on my post and all that has turned up is that i've held the same position consistently. The TOS can't be any clearer: "You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you." Cut and dry, no wiggle room for interpretation.

I never said they had anything to do with one another. But the rules apply to him as well, they can't just be used for his benefit.

Rudey, you're in no position to to talk about pissing matches and acting heinously towards people. You thrive on both.

Hoosier's made some ridiculous racist comments before, and if I remember correctly, at some point in time has made anti-semitic comments. It's been going on for years, and many of them have been deleted and/or edited.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why Conservatives Are Smarter
 

Funny how zntke erased quite a few of those threads since they were about him and I was pushing the topic. I know what the TOS says. I pushed John on that topic a couple years ago. If John is against it, he will define copyrighted materials and say how much of an article that is posted is considered copyrighted. If John is against it, he will erase this forum. If John is against it, he will instruct the moderators to erase all such previous posts in the other forums.

Let me repeat this to you. YOU CANNOT POST HIS NAME. POSTING HIS NAME HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH COPYRIGHTED MATERIALS. Did it help that I put it in capital letters?

No I am in such a position. You are heinous.

Again explain what anti-semitic has to do with anything? Why did you bring it up in this thread? Why with me?? Let me help you. I've called two people out on it (Tom Earp and Cashmoney). I wasn't the only one, but you seem to have brought this up with me only. Those same two people, I have said made racist comments as well, but you seem to only bring up anti-semitism. And before you compared anti-semitism to having ill feelings toward the French, another stupid comment. So again Dani, please explain yourself. If hoosier posts something racist or anti-semitic, I will say something. This thread has nothing of that nature and ONLY YOU BROUGHT UP ANTI-SEMITISM.

Now go sell some underwear on ebay counselor.

-Rudey
--J to the O to the K to the E

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why Conservatives Are Smarter
 

I try to stack things up real good, but sometimes I fail.

Left wing Americans, Nazis, commies, etc. all want:

the public sector to provide
1 - health care
2 - education
3 - utilities
4 - mass transit

and sometimes also
5 - banking
6 - mining
7 - fuel extraction

It's common in Mexico, Argentina, and other oil-rich countries for the govt. to own/control the oil business, banking, etc. In the USA, the govt. already controls education, health care, and transit, and tightly supervises health care, utilities, banking, fuel extraction, and mining. Dems and libs want even more control.

===========
You said: Redistribution of the wealth does not equate to 'From each according to their ability to each according to their need'. They're different things.
===========

Actually, they're exactly the same thing. Dems/socialists/lefties favor the graduated income tax - high rates for high income people and businesses. Financially conservative people favor low taxes, levied and administered locally (not by the federal govt.), and know that businesses NEVER actually PAY taxes, they just collect it (as a hidden tax) from customers.

My signature: I try to make it valuable.

Thanks for your interesting questions/comments.

+++++++++++++
And here's some points copied from the evil Wiki:

Communism refers to a theoretical system of social organization and a political movement based on common ownership of the means of production . As a political movement, communism seeks to establish a classless society. A major force in world politics since the early 20th century , modern communism is generally associated with The Communist Manifesto of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels , according to which the capitalist profit-based system of private ownership is replaced by a communist society in which the means of production are communally owned

----------

the de facto meaning of socialism has changed with time. Although it is a politically- loaded term, it remains strongly-related to the establishment of an organized working class ; created through either revolution or by social evolution , with the purpose of building a classless society .

--------------

In Marxist theory, it also refers to the society that would succeed or supplant capitalism , and would later develop further into communism , as the necessity for the socialist structure would wither away.

------------

Democratic socialists maintain a commitment to the re-distribution of wealth and power and social ownership of most major industry, and some believe in a planned economy

------------

Democratic socialists have normally defended the role of the public sector , particularly as regards the provision of key services such as health care, education, utilities, mass transit, and sometimes also banking, mining, and fuel extraction.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why Conservatives Are Smarter
 

Your definition of racism is so broad that it includes ANYTHING NOT PRAISING black people. The real definition is "saying or doing something imparting that your own race is superior to another."

We'll never agree as long as our definitions vary so much.

You don't correctly remember any anti-semitic comment posted by me.