GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Greek Life (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   But why are the NPHC groups so ... different??? (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=581)

Peaches-n-Cream 02-03-2004 12:39 AM

Can someone please give an example of events that NPHC alumni/ grads participate in? Do you continue with the philanthropic and service events from your undergrad years? I ask because my alumnae chapter is relatively new and we are trying to figure out how to give back through community service events. Thanks. :)

ETA: Thank you Iota Net for starting this thread. I know it was in 2000, but I didn't discover it until today. :)

Munchkin03 02-03-2004 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peaches-n-Cream
Can someone please give an example of events that NPHC alumni/ grads participate in?
My sister's chapter has sponsored a debutante ball (with scholarships), works with a mentoring program for at-risk youth, and sponsors a scholarship for an outstanding local student. Larger chapters are instrumental in organizing events for MLK's birthday, SAT prep courses in the local high schools, college fairs, and other things.

IotaNet 02-03-2004 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peaches-n-Cream
Can someone please give an example of events that NPHC alumni/ grads participate in?
Here's an example of a national program that we recently launched. All of our Alumni chapters will participate:

BusinessKids

Peaches-n-Cream 02-03-2004 01:10 AM

Thanks Munchkin & IotaNet!

stardusttwin 02-03-2004 01:33 AM

For Psych Tau:

From what I've seen on these boards (& correct me if I am wrong) many alumnae chapters for NIC/NPC groups are connected directly to the undergrad chapter of initiation. I think that adjusting that set up would be a start for encouraging membership past college years.

Members of NPHC alumnae/alumni chapters are not all from one undergrad chapter. So if you pledged at XYZ college when you graduate and move to anytown, USA, you are expected to affiliate with the local alumnae chapter which will be made up of women from age 24-80+ who have all joined at different colleges and are in different stages of life. You may maintain a special bond with those from your undergrad (or grad) initiating chapter (and still support them), but you are expected to continue your individual membership and service for life where ever you are nationwide. When you think about it, you are a member in undergrad for 2-3 years (say 18-21). If you live to be 61 thats 50 years of service through your grad chapter. Much longer than your undergrad years (I hope). This is why its not unheard of for members to be initiated through alumnae/grad chapters...even if one is invited to membership at age 40-you have plenty of years to work hard for your organization.

As for events... there are national initiatives for all NPHC groups but it really depends on the area-what one chapter focuses on may not be a pressing need in another community. The beauty is you are always learning and when one group has a successful event/initiative there is no harm in putting the program in affect somewhere else. Who cares who set up the mentoring program first? If it works, just do it!!

To clarify, I'm not a member, but I have lots of friends who are active on the alumnae level.

ChaosDST 02-03-2004 03:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 33girl
How many rush threads have there been where people have said (completely random examples) "Well I like Theta best, but Theta has been unfriendly and Kappa is really nice" and everyone said "go for Kappa!" You would pretty much NEVER see that among NPHC members. If someone said "I did not get chosen for Delta" the response would not be "look at Z Phi B" it would be "work and wait until it is your time for Delta."

When you work for years to achieve something, naturally you value it more.


You're very observant! :)

AGDAlum 02-03-2004 01:50 PM

Another difference is REAL ESTATE.

NIC/NPC chapters on many campuses have houses that are very expensive to acquire and to maintain. Although some campuses have Greek dorms or provide chapter suites, the traditional idea of Greek housing is a house or lodge with meeting and dining space and sleeping quarters for some or many of the members.

I'm sure that some NPHC chapters have houses, but not to the extent that NIC/NPC groups do.

Rain Man 02-03-2004 03:35 PM

Another difference...
 
....NIC/NPC GLO members tend to pledge and recognize themselves as affiliated with a CHAPTER of their GLO rather than the org as a whole. NPHC orgs tend to pledge and recognize themselves as affiliated with the org as a whole, with their chapter affiliation being merely happenstance. Thus, there is much less issues dealing with transfer brothers/sister in an NPHC org than with a NIC/NPC org.

NinjaPoodle 02-03-2004 04:15 PM

YES!!:) Right on point.

Quote:

Originally posted by stardusttwin
For Psych Tau:

From what I've seen on these boards (& correct me if I am wrong) many alumnae chapters for NIC/NPC groups are connected directly to the undergrad chapter of initiation. I think that adjusting that set up would be a start for encouraging membership past college years.

Members of NPHC alumnae/alumni chapters are not all from one undergrad chapter. So if you pledged at XYZ college when you graduate and move to anytown, USA, you are expected to affiliate with the local alumnae chapter which will be made up of women from age 24-80+ who have all joined at different colleges and are in different stages of life. You may maintain a special bond with those from your undergrad (or grad) initiating chapter (and still support them), but you are expected to continue your individual membership and service for life where ever you are nationwide. When you think about it, you are a member in undergrad for 2-3 years (say 18-21). If you live to be 61 thats 50 years of service through your grad chapter. Much longer than your undergrad years (I hope). This is why its not unheard of for members to be initiated through alumnae/grad chapters...even if one is invited to membership at age 40-you have plenty of years to work hard for your organization.

As for events... there are national initiatives for all NPHC groups but it really depends on the area-what one chapter focuses on may not be a pressing need in another community. The beauty is you are always learning and when one group has a successful event/initiative there is no harm in putting the program in affect somewhere else. Who cares who set up the mentoring program first? If it works, just do it!!

To clarify, I'm not a member, but I have lots of friends who are active on the alumnae level.


MelodyCat 02-03-2004 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Taualumna
Yes, you're right, it is recent.
It isn't recent for all NPC groups, though. Alpha Phi's first AI was Frances Willard in the early 1900's, if I've gotten my date correct. It may well have been earlier than that.

One more edit, and this one's to thank all the NPHC members for this thread. I've learned a lot about your groups from reading it. :)

Jill1228 02-03-2004 04:56 PM

Frances Williard became an AI for Alpha Phi in 1875 :)

Quote:

Originally posted by MelodyCat
It isn't recent for all NPC groups, though. Alpha Phi's first AI was Frances Willard in the early 1900's, if I've gotten my date correct. It may well have been earlier than that.

One more edit, and this one's to thank all the NPHC members for this thread. I've learned a lot about your groups from reading it. :)


DGMarie 02-03-2004 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MelodyCat
It isn't recent for all NPC groups, though. Alpha Phi's first AI was Frances Willard in the early 1900's, if I've gotten my date correct. It may well have been earlier than that.

One more edit, and this one's to thank all the NPHC members for this thread. I've learned a lot about your groups from reading it. :)

Delta Gamma has also had this from early years. But to the point, it is uncommon.

MelodyCat 02-03-2004 05:09 PM

That's true. It is uncommon, but it's not a recent development. :)

Thanks for correcting my date, Jill. :)

Senusret I 02-03-2004 06:34 PM

Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Rain Man
NPHC orgs tend to pledge and recognize themselves as affiliated with the org as a whole, with their chapter affiliation being merely happenstance. Thus, there is much less issues dealing with transfer brothers/sister in an NPHC org than with a NIC/NPC org.
I beg to differ. If more NPHC members thought of themselves as having pledged an ORGANIZATION as opposed to a chapter, more than ten percent would go on to transfer to alumni chapters.

Rain Man 02-04-2004 01:30 AM

Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Senusret I
I beg to differ. If more NPHC members thought of themselves as having pledged an ORGANIZATION as opposed to a chapter, more than ten percent would go on to transfer to alumni chapters.
I was strictly speaking relatively to the average mentality of NIC/NPC orgs in that regard

HotDamnImAPhiMu 02-04-2004 02:01 AM

Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Senusret I
I beg to differ. If more NPHC members thought of themselves as having pledged an ORGANIZATION as opposed to a chapter, more than ten percent would go on to transfer to alumni chapters.

Eh, I disagree. That may be, though, that GC draws very committed GLO members.

Senusret I 02-04-2004 08:34 AM

Re: Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by HotDamnImAPhiMu
Eh, I disagree. That may be, though, that GC draws very committed GLO members.
And GC is not a scientific cross-section of Greek life. If it a collection of those who have the time, leisure, and inclination to use this board as entertainment.

The ten percent yield is a fact for NPHC fraternity men. The yield is about forty percent for NPHC sorority women. (Strictly speaking of the college to alumni transition, not alumni initiates.)

starang21 02-04-2004 09:26 AM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Senusret I
And GC is not a scientific cross-section of Greek life. If it a collection of those who have the time, leisure, and inclination to use this board as entertainment.

The ten percent yield is a fact for NPHC fraternity men. The yield is about forty percent for NPHC sorority women. (Strictly speaking of the college to alumni transition, not alumni initiates.)

where did this 10 percent come from?

Senusret I 02-04-2004 09:45 AM

Either Lawrence Ross or Walter Kimbrough -- I can't remember which of them, but it was a source I trusted.

DIVA1177 02-04-2004 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Senusret I
Either Lawrence Ross or Walter Kimbrough -- I can't remember which of them, but it was a source I trusted.
Did you get that from Black Greek 101?

IotaNet 02-04-2004 01:23 PM

Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Senusret I
I beg to differ. If more NPHC members thought of themselves as having pledged an ORGANIZATION as opposed to a chapter, more than ten percent would go on to transfer to alumni chapters.
Actually -

I think Rainman had it right in his post. While the Undergrad to Grad retention rates are lower than any of us would like, I don't think that speaks to the concept of people pledging and organization vs. a chapter.

If you ask the average Graduate NPHC member about his affiliation, he/she will most likely say: "I am an XYZ (Iota/Alpha/etc.") He may then go on to say, "I pledged at XYZ chapter." Although the chapter affiliation is important, the prime identification is with the organization.

Regarding retention, 10% is not setting the world on fire but it's a pretty significant number. Sensuret - Think about your own Grad Chapter in DC. Although you probably initiate new members on a semi-regular basis, I'd bet that the majority of Mu Lambda's active membership is comprised of people who transitioned from the Undergraduate ranks.

Think of the words of your hymn ...

"College days do swiftly pass, imbued with mem'ries fond. And the recollection slowly fades away. Our renowned A Phi A, and dear Fraternal Bond, May they ever Abide with us and with us stay."

Or the Kappa hymn ...

When all our student days are gone, and from school we must go, Still we will honor, love and sing, They praises o'er and 'oer.

Obviously, I am not an Alpha or a Kappa ;) but to me, that is a "built-in reminder" that one is expected to move on to the next level in the Fraternity -- and place the Fraternal affliation first.

Just my thoughts ...

Senusret I 02-04-2004 01:51 PM

Re: Re: Re: Another difference...
 
IotaNet,

I understand your point, but I still disagree.

Also, the majority of "active" members in my chapter are alumni initiates.

starang21 02-04-2004 02:11 PM

Re: Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by IotaNet
Actually -

I think Rainman had it right in his post. While the Undergrad to Grad retention rates are lower than any of us would like, I don't think that speaks to the concept of people pledging and organization vs. a chapter.

If you ask the average Graduate NPHC member about his affiliation, he/she will most likely say: "I am an XYZ (Iota/Alpha/etc.") He may then go on to say, "I pledged at XYZ chapter." Although the chapter affiliation is important, the prime identification is with the organization.

Regarding retention, 10% is not setting the world on fire but it's a pretty significant number. Sensuret - Think about your own Grad Chapter in DC. Although you probably initiate new members on a semi-regular basis, I'd bet that the majority of Mu Lambda's active membership is comprised of people who transitioned from the Undergraduate ranks.

Think of the words of your hymn ...

"College days do swiftly pass, imbued with mem'ries fond. And the recollection slowly fades away. Our renowned A Phi A, and dear Fraternal Bond, May they ever Abide with us and with us stay."

Or the Kappa hymn ...

When all our student days are gone, and from school we must go, Still we will honor, love and sing, They praises o'er and 'oer.

Obviously, I am not an Alpha or a Kappa ;) but to me, that is a "built-in reminder" that one is expected to move on to the next level in the Fraternity -- and place the Fraternal affliation first.

Just my thoughts ...

co sign, i think most brothers who are members of graduate chapters were made as undergraduates. people are very fanatic about their undergraduate chapters because that is the primary fraternal contact they have had. as a brother who was made as a graduate student, i still have a strong connection with the undergraduates and graduate students who had a part in making me. does that mean i'm going to forgo all affiliation in the grad chapter? no, but the undergrad connection is still very strong. i "intook" Iota, to wear these beautiful colors, to wear these beautiful letters, to know the sacred knowledge of my Shield, and to uphold the sacred principles. many people who get initiated through a grad chapter already have their life in order, therefore have the time to be active in their chapter. that's why you see a lot of older heads who were not inititated as grads, but were made as undergrads. they already have the time to put forth the effort. a lot of the younger members fresh out of school are still trying to secure themselves before they put the time and effort needed. of course, there are many who don't meet that.

ChaosDST 02-04-2004 03:46 PM

Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Rain Man
....NIC/NPC GLO members tend to pledge and recognize themselves as affiliated with a CHAPTER of their GLO rather than the org as a whole. NPHC orgs tend to pledge and recognize themselves as affiliated with the org as a whole, with their chapter affiliation being merely happenstance. Thus, there is much less issues dealing with transfer brothers/sister in an NPHC org than with a NIC/NPC org.

Sort of correct and maybe I am reading your post wrong. It is true that we NPHC members affiliate ourselves with our National bodies and continue to identify with our organizations upon transferring to other schools or graduating.

However, it is important to note that the majority of us do remain very attached (to varying degrees) and loyal (to varying degrees) to our chapters of initiation (through ongoing ties with older and younger chapter members, etc.), eventhough we are no longer financial members of the chapter and regular participants in all of the programs. This is sometimes discouraged, but continues to be the case (depending upon the dynamics of the chapter).

ChaosDST 02-04-2004 03:50 PM

Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Senusret I
I beg to differ. If more NPHC members thought of themselves as having pledged an ORGANIZATION as opposed to a chapter, more than ten percent would go on to transfer to alumni chapters.

I partially agree with you. However, there are many contributing factors that go into the relatively small percentage of undergrad initiates who join graduate chapters. For instance, some continue their pledge to the organization, while serving as a Member-At-Large.

ChaosDST 02-04-2004 03:52 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Senusret I
And GC is not a scientific cross-section of Greek life. If it a collection of those who have the time, leisure, and inclination to use this board as entertainment.

The ten percent yield is a fact for NPHC fraternity men. The yield is about forty percent for NPHC sorority women. (Strictly speaking of the college to alumni transition, not alumni initiates.)

You're right!

This is why alumnae and graduate chapters have been addressing this issue.

ChaosDST 02-04-2004 03:54 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by starang21
where did this 10 percent come from?

The percentage is actually quite accurate.

Did you assume it to be more, based on your circle of BGLO members?

:p

Senusret I 02-04-2004 03:55 PM

Re: Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ChaosDST
I partially agree with you. However, there are many contributing factors that go into the relatively small percentage of undergrad initiates who join graduate chapters. For instance, some continue their pledge to the organization, while serving as a Member-At-Large.
Yeah, we're on the same page. I am particularly thinking of "Single Letter Syndrome" among other things....many other things, lol.

ChaosDST 02-04-2004 03:59 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Senusret I
Yeah, we're on the same page. I am particularly thinking of "Single Letter Syndrome" among other things....many other things, lol.
we...are....>>>>>here<<<<<<<


LOL

HotDamnImAPhiMu 02-04-2004 04:40 PM

hijack

POST WHORE ALERT!

/hijack

Tom Earp 02-04-2004 04:56 PM

I dont think this is to uncommon with any GLO. In the Words of Brother Rambo, it is the old 80-20 syndrom. 80 % dont do anything and 20% do the work.

As I understand, that NHPC GLOs depending on the Campus have smaller Chapters. Therefore, there is a greater AI induction.

Either way, it takes more than a few to make the machine work. I know that We as a Chapter would rather do it ourselves than try to depened on our International. Sad to say.

I am sure each and everyone of us have horror stories about relationships with our Hdq, but what I have found on GC, yes, more dedicated people who are members of any GLO have been able to meet others from the same GLO and those of others. I have learned a lot and hope to still keep learning!:)

Maybe, this is a way to say that "most" on GC are The Cream of our Organizations, those who care!

ChaosDST 02-04-2004 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by HotDamnImAPhiMu
hijack

POST WHORE ALERT!

/hijack


Are you a post whore?

:confused:

ChaosDST 02-04-2004 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom Earp
As I understand, that NHPC GLOs depending on the Campus have smaller Chapters. Therefore, there is a greater AI induction.


Care to explain?

starang21 02-04-2004 07:41 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ChaosDST
The percentage is actually quite accurate.

Did you assume it to be more, based on your circle of BGLO members?

:p

of course, you know Iotas graduate

:p

ChaosDST 02-04-2004 09:39 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by starang21
of course, you know Iotas graduate

:p

We're talking about graduate chapter membership, not just graduating :p

starang21 02-04-2004 09:51 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Another difference...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ChaosDST
We're talking about graduate chapter membership, not just graduating :p
:(

yea you right.....

:(

HotDamnImAPhiMu 02-04-2004 10:55 PM

A post whore is someone who posts many times in a row in an effort to "up" their posts. Say, four times.

ChaosDST 02-05-2004 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by HotDamnImAPhiMu
A post whore is someone who posts many times in a row in an effort to "up" their posts. Say, four times.
More accurately, someone who's just trying to catch up with the convo.

The Komeback 09-16-2007 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Senusret I (Post 636832)
And GC is not a scientific cross-section of Greek life. If it a collection of those who have the time, leisure, and inclination to use this board as entertainment.

The ten percent yield is a fact for NPHC fraternity men. The yield is about forty percent for NPHC sorority women. (Strictly speaking of the college to alumni transition, not alumni initiates.)

Senusret I, are these percentages still holding true for NPHC organizations?

rhoyaltempest 09-16-2007 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Komeback (Post 1520302)
Senusret I, are these percentages still holding true for NPHC organizations?

You could have asked him that without resurrecting this tired thread.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.