Yes he did. Way more. On multiple occasions. Annoying is what the ignore function is good for; and banning is, in his case, well deserved. More than once.

His dissembling is disingenuous.

I forgot some people need the ignore feature to ignore a username. I'm going to start a thread titled "who do you officially and unofficially have on ignore." :)

This sentence made me dizzy.

If you are the first or the last sorority or women's fraternity that doesn't make you the best. Why is everyone assumgin such a thing?

I suppose this question is better for local organizations. Theta, Phi Mu, or even ADPhi may have been the first that women's fraternities or sororities that went National but what about the smaller, less known groups like Phi Nu?

I left my Baird's manual upstate. Maybe I'll find an older copy online. I was just curious if anyone had found any women's fraternity that came before Theta.

And I'll state it again, first or last, it doesn't make your GLO the best.

Absolutely NO ONE has mentioned that or even implied it! Why would you say something so negative and completely untrue? Not a single person here has done anything but explain what our organizations were founded to do and the purpose that we served at inception... and we have been pretty friendly and panhellenic about it.

I see no one trying to claim "the best", not a SINGLE time. Indeed, I see many talking about being "first" as being somewhat silly in the great scheme of things. We ALL have things to be very proud of in our organization's founding.

Quit trying to make trouble where none exists. Shame on you :mad:

Thank you for posting this!!! It was exactly what I was thinking!! I was actually enjoying the small historic stories being provided! Thank you for Theta story, very interesting. :)

It was pas who started this thread in the first place. Seems like her intent from the start was to make trouble & sow dissent. Didn't work very well, did it? :D

Worry about your own organization.

No she meant another organization (see her original post). This thread is a total, utter waste of our time and energy, and it's not even a decent train wreck (although when badgeguy stepped in I thought it had potential but he's gone back under the rock apparently at least for the time being).

Bottom line: no one here give a isht besides the OP and badgeguy.

Let's go get some gelato, als463. My treat.

It sort of did.

Which one? She only has 24 hours in a day.

Reading is fundamental:

Quote:

Originally Posted by pas (Post 2273632) I suppose this question is better for local organizations. Theta, Phi Mu, or even ADPhi may have been the first that women's fraternities or sororities that went National but what about the smaller, less known groups like Phi Nu?

;)

Wow. Calm down there folks.

If you think this thread is a waste of time don't reply to it or read it.

And I did mean Phi Nu. Founded at MacMurray College in 1853. The local is still going strong. :)

And for those who actually care about the original purpose of this thread, I also found the Willard Society which was founded at Nebraska Wesleyan University in 1889 and that organization is still going strong. I'm not sure, however, if it is structured like a GLO. I think it may be.

Also I suspect that maybe women's fraternities were founded when women were allowed to enter into college. So perhaps many teacher's colleges had women's social organizations.

I suppose I have answered my own question. I don't know why some of you are just waiting to attack all the time. This site is pretty hostile a lot of times. The original question was misunderstood and people just went their way with it.

It's still later than Adelphean Society and according to the MacMurray website, they are a social Service organization. They may not function on the same level as a regular sorority. Their dues are $70. It's hard to judge what "going strong" means without a website to see what they actually do. I'm impressed by their longevity, but why start a whole thread about a group when you have so little information about them?

Look: if you're going to start a thread on a subject, and you get several polite posts that indicate that said thread is (fill in the blank), but attempt to politely comment on your (fill in the blank) topic, yet you persevere on said (fill in the blank) topic, posting more tangential "info", don't get all butt hurt when you get called on your isht and call the posters on the thread (or the site in general) "hostile" or whatever.

If you don't pick up on what people are politely setting down in front of you, early on, and you persevere, you're gonna get hit upside the head with Hank Aaron's bat. Just sayin'.

Yeah, I can read thanks. I never heard of Phi Nu. You could see how someone might think that even though she initially mentioned Phi Mu, listing Phi Nu might seem like she may have made a mistake. ;)

Truthfully, I agree with AZTheta. This seems like a useless thread that was started to get people all up in arms.

Not really, not when in context she's talking about locals as opposed to nationals. But if that's how you read it, despite that fact that she had already mentioned Phi Mu, perhaps you could have simply asked whether she made a typo or was referring to an org you're not familiar with, rather than assuming she made a typo and giving a mini-lecture on how Phi Mu isn't smaller or lesser known.

Sometimes it just seems like folks are looking for anything to attack. It's not that big a deal.

This thread seems to have been about the claims of the organizations within the article listed in the original posting.....I believe reading further down that it was others who began to "bicker" about the thread.

I highly doubt that anyone even bothered to click the link. It's very informative on women's organizations.

Before someone posts anything they should take the time to read all the info before making comments.

Just an thought. There is no need to create a hostile environment where non existed......

Quoted for facts.

LOL..... I didn't even click the link either. Checking it out now...

I actually did read it and no, it isn't very informative.

QF. Pot, meet kettle. You need to go back and re-read. And you would be smart to lurk.

Mrs alpha zeta theta...you seem to be the most hostile person responding? What did I ever do to you?

I find the histories of the various organizations interesting and joined GC to learn what I can, and to share things I've also learned.

You seem to have some grudge that needs to be resolved, have you seen anyone about your anger issues?

Anyway, this thread was about the history of women's orgs. It's only a waste of time to those who are self centered with their own egos than about the pursuit of learning.

:)

:D Here's your sign, folks.

:rolleyes: How many male collegiate sinfonians do you think would be reading threads about women's fraternity minutia? I think not. Alpha Zeta Theta? What high school sorority is that? And do you have a badge to sell us?

Then why take the bait?

MC I am working on a hostility rating scale, stay tuned!

You're right. You and I are friends so I apologize for being snarky with you. As far as Badgeguy (or sinfonia H-O) goes, telling AZTheta she needs to work on her anger is pretty ridiculous.

It's all good. ;)

One of many free services I provide.

I think this would make a great signature.

It's stuff like this tempting me to visit more often.

Especially when the OP gets to lick the spoon they stirred the shitpot with.