GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   President Obama vs. Governor Jan Brewer (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=124473)

KSig RC 01-27-2012 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knight_shadow (Post 2121355)
Forgive my (youthful) ignorance, but how recent of a phenomenon is the political pundit? I'm sure they have existed in one form or another for many years, but it seems that they've come out in full force recently (both sides of the aisle). I think our dependence on the internet has helped them spread like wildfires and I don't like it.

Punditry has existed forever - I mean, depending on how you frame it, the Federalist Papers were pretty explicitly political commentary/punditry.

I think the difference is in the stances/angles/attitudes taken by those pundits. Compare somebody like old boy George Will with more current models ... and yes, I picked Will because he's boring as hell.

Quote:

Oh, and the race thing too.
Yeah ... I mean, there's one obvious difference in this Presidency, and while discourse may have deteriorated over time (there's an element of "communication changing" that muddies the subjective elements), it kind of fails Occam's Razor to assume the largest changes were coincidental to inauguration, by chance.

PiKA2001 01-27-2012 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KSig RC (Post 2121372)
This is sort of like saying Phil Knight is suing Reebok for patent infringement. It's correct in the sense that Obama is head of the Executive branch, but it seems fairly reductionist.

After all, in another stilted sense, you and I are suing Jan Brewer.

Is Phil Knight suing Reebok? No, it would be Nike who would be suing right? But if Phil Knight is the CEO of Nike and is the one who made the call to sue and demanded his lawyers file a patent infringement lawsuit against Reebok where does the difference lay?

And since neither of us have any input or control of who the DOJ chooses to go after, no its not the same.

KSig RC 01-27-2012 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PiKA2001 (Post 2121376)
Is Phil Knight suing Reebok? No, it would be Nike who would be suing right? But if Phil Knight is the CEO of Nike and is the one who made the call to sue and demanded his lawyers file a patent infringement lawsuit against Reebok where does the difference lay?

Saying "Obama sued ____" implies a level of control Obama doesn't have.

He can likely push for an action, and can probably kill a given action if he chooses as the guy at the 'top of the pile', but he certainly can't do any of that without the DOJ's backing and vetting of the case ... he's at 'best' a necessary, but not sufficient condition. Likely, his day-to-day interactions with the DOJ are similar to Phil Knight's over his legal department - which is to say, oversight, but not direct management.

It's not really a major issue - you're more right than wrong, but the language is a bit strong and might be taken to imply something more about Obama himself. I think it's pushing it to say it was "Obama" as if it were him and him alone.

EDIT: I just realized that the disconnect might be coming from the military ... people often say "Bush invaded Iraq" or similar, to shorthand standing as CIC, and I didn't even consider you might be making that kind of connection, so my bad. I still think that the role of the President in relation to the DOJ (as I understand it) is different, especially given the nature of the title of Commander in Chief and the ceremony and etc. that comes with it, as well as the nature of foreign policy. I well may be wrong.

Quote:

And since neither of us have any input or control of who the DOJ chooses to go after, no its not the same.
I didn't mean that they were the same ... but the logic could be contorted to be similar. After all, Obama is "in charge" of the DOJ, and the DOJ represents the interests of the American people with their explicit consent to do so.

DubaiSis 01-27-2012 02:40 AM

This argument is probably a win/win for both President Obama and whatshername. He gets to be seen as above the fray, elegant in confrontation and, well, presidential. And she gets to seen as confrontational, aggressive, not afraid of some black guy standing in front of her and without any need for the finer graces in her life. So they're both speaking to their base. Not that it was planned. Even I'm not that cynical.

Please tell me she's not a sorority woman.

knight_shadow 01-27-2012 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DubaiSis (Post 2121391)
Please tell me she's not a sorority woman.

If this situation is as negative as it's being reported, I'm not sure her affiliation (or lack thereof) is relevant.

MysticCat 01-27-2012 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KSig RC (Post 2121386)
Saying "Obama sued ____" implies a level of control Obama doesn't have.

He can likely push for an action, and can probably kill a given action if he chooses as the guy at the 'top of the pile', but he certainly can't do any of that without the DOJ's backing and vetting of the case ... he's at 'best' a necessary, but not sufficient condition. Likely, his day-to-day interactions with the DOJ are similar to Phil Knight's over his legal department - which is to say, oversight, but not direct management.

It's not really a major issue - you're more right than wrong, but the language is a bit strong and might be taken to imply something more about Obama himself. I think it's pushing it to say it was "Obama" as if it were him and him alone.

EDIT: I just realized that the disconnect might be coming from the military ... people often say "Bush invaded Iraq" or similar, to shorthand standing as CIC, and I didn't even consider you might be making that kind of connection, so my bad. I still think that the role of the President in relation to the DOJ (as I understand it) is different, especially given the nature of the title of Commander in Chief and the ceremony and etc. that comes with it, as well as the nature of foreign policy. I well may be wrong.

Co-sign.

amIblue? 01-27-2012 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DubaiSis (Post 2121391)
Please tell me she's not a sorority woman.

She's not. Here's what wikipedia has to say about her education:

Quote:

Born in California, Brewer attended Glendale Community College where she received a radiological technologist certificate, but never earned a degree.
Unless she was offered AI by an org.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Brewer

AZTheta 01-27-2012 09:47 AM

Bad manners are bad manners. Greek letters afford no protection.

Personally, I think Brewer's just another horrific Arizona politician. We have (more than) our fair share of loonies. My theory: too much sun and dust + not enough water = crazy brains. As long as I've lived here we have had nut jobs in the governor's office. I did warn AOII Angel about it before she moved here.

There'll be something else, soon, I'm sure of that. It's basically "NOW what?" when I read/listen to the news each morning.

DrPhil 01-27-2012 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AzTheta (Post 2121411)
There'll be something else, soon, I'm sure of that. It's basically "NOW what?" when I read/listen to the news each morning.

Bullet-ridden Obama pic posted on facebook page of a Peoria, Arizona police officer, Sgt. Pat Shearer, on January 20 is being investigated by Secret Service.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46159633...news-security/

AZTheta 01-27-2012 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 2121413)
Bullet-ridden Obama pic posted on facebook page of a Peoria, Arizona police officer, Sgt. Pat Shearer, on January 20 is being investigated by Secret Service.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46159633...news-security/

This is reprehensible.

AOII Angel 01-27-2012 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AzTheta (Post 2121422)
This is reprehensible.

Oh Peoria...so glad I didn't take that job out there.

AOII Angel 01-27-2012 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AzTheta (Post 2121411)
Bad manners are bad manners. Greek letters afford no protection.

Personally, I think Brewer's just another horrific Arizona politician. We have (more than) our fair share of loonies. My theory: too much sun and dust + not enough water = crazy brains. As long as I've lived here we have had nut jobs in the governor's office. I did warn AOII Angel about it before she moved here.

There'll be something else, soon, I'm sure of that. It's basically "NOW what?" when I read/listen to the news each morning.

Speaking of Peoria...did you see who took Bungard's place in the State Senate after stepped down to avoid an ethics inquiry for beating up his girlfriend then exerting lawmaker privilege? A woman who is all about stopping those dang "anchor babies!" Where do they find these people? Apparently in Peoria!

DrPhil 01-30-2012 11:07 PM

Don't shoot the messenger.

http://crunkfeministcollective.wordpress.com/2012/01/27/white-womens-rage-5-thoughts-on-why-jan-brewer-should-keep-her-fingers-to-herself/

http://crunkfeministcollective.files...pg?w=389&h=295

moe.ron 01-31-2012 12:21 AM

i don't know if I would have stayed cool if somebody pointed her finger at me.

On another note, the more I read about the Governor, the more I think she's insane. She lied that her father died in WWII fighting the Nazi. In reality, he died in 1955 in California.

AOII Angel 01-31-2012 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moe.ron (Post 2122291)
i don't know if I would have stayed cool if somebody pointed her finger at me.

On another note, the more I read about the Governor, the more I think she's insane. She lied that her father died in WWII fighting the Nazi. In reality, he died in 1955 in California.

That's just the tip of the iceberg!

Kevin 01-31-2012 11:34 AM

It's an election year, so the media has been picking up a lot of liberal vs. conservative psychology research. One of those studies found that conservatives tended to have stronger visceral reactions to negative stimuli than liberals.

Conservative pundits and leaders seem to be capitalizing on that by expressing much more visceral and base reactions to Democratic leaders. Jan Brewer is really the tip of the iceberg. Classlessness and crassness are not just how leaders are acting, it's party policy.

I'm sure everyone has heard about that famous '94 GOPAC memo written by then Speaker Gingrich. Conservatives were directed to use very strong and colorful language to refer to their colleagues across the aisle. This was aimed at eliciting the visceral and emotional responses we're seeing today.

So as to Brewer herself, don't hate the player, hate the game.

KillarneyRose 01-31-2012 03:05 PM

Ugh. This reminds me of Barbara Boxer and her "Don't Call Me Ma'am" debacle.

I can almost understand why some women in positions of responsibility would want to exert themselves in what is traditionally a "Boys Club", but there is a thin, thin like between looking like a strong, principled woman and looking like a raving loon. I fear their outbursts may have relegated Ms. Brewer and Ms. Boxer forever to the loony camp.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.