GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Greek Life (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   Difficult Recolonization Question (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=113020)

KSUViolet06 04-21-2010 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCunningham (Post 1918974)
If you were to read back on my original post, it was about whether or not it was "legally" viable. I am not worried about the social simplifications, nor should anyone else who doesn't know what state, fraternity, or school I am a student of.

Oh man. LOL @ you thinking there aren't SEC guys (and girls too) who post here (and lurk) that could figure that out. We have an entire thread dedicated to upcoming colonizations and re-charterings. Wouldn't take a rocket scientist. There are folks out there who would definitely "be worried" about someone pledging their fraternity with no intent to join.

How many Jeff Cunninghams are there in fraternities at SEC schools where a new fraternity is re-chartering after being gone for 5 years? You've given out more than enough info here for someone to figure that out.

MysticCat 04-21-2010 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gusteau (Post 1918932)
If I were recruiting men for a new colony I wouldn't pick the ones that had jumped ship from another one when it didn't go their way. Being in a colony is tough work, and I wouldn't trust you to stick around. Furthermore I wouldn't recruit anyone who could not really become a brother, that stipulation is ridiculous.

Well, if breathesgelatin is around, she can fill us in on what happened at W&L when she was there -- there's a thread about somewhere around here. Definitely the exception, though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCunningham (Post 1918942)
. . . but helping a honorable organization reestablish themselves is good enough for me.

Yes, I'm sure the honorable organization will appreciate your efforts, given what you yourself acknowledge:
Quote:

Originally Posted by JCunningham (Post 1918922)
Lastly, I know this is unethical . . .

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCunningham (Post 1918966)
I am fully aware that I am betraying the values that have been laid down by my fraternity and the brothers which have founded it both nationally and on my campus.

I really can't believe you registered and posted (with your real name, no less) just to fill us all in on this.

http://creativegreenius.files.wordpr...nt-of-fail.jpg

DrPhil 04-21-2010 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticCat (Post 1919033)
I really can't believe you registered and posted (with your real name, no less) just to fill us all in on this.

http://creativegreenius.files.wordpr...nt-of-fail.jpg

You beat me to it. :)

Jeff Cunningham is an idiot and this is a huge FAIL.

FSUZeta 04-21-2010 09:53 AM

i think it all boils down to being affiliated(even if it is in a rubbing elbows kind of way) with a formerly very prestigious fraternity that has the potential to regain its former reputation once it returns to campus and reaping the rewards of that affiliation-powerful, successful alumni, great parties, gorgeous girls attending said parties, etc.

it's not about the long term benefits, because there aren't any(except maybe a job offer with prestigious firm and a trophy wife), it's about the here and now.

KSUViolet06 04-21-2010 10:16 AM

But fsuzeta, he doesn't want to be a brother. He just wants to pledge and drop out pre-initiation.

MUSK81 04-21-2010 10:27 AM

Look, Jeff, are you in or out? Do you love your chapter or not? If so, you will stay, take some of these suggestions to heart, and do what you can to effect the change you say you want. If not, the best thing to do is disaffiliate. You'd be doing yourself and your brothers a favor in the long run.

ree-Xi 04-21-2010 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCunningham (Post 1918955)
An additional two pledge classes have come through and only compounded the problem.

The specific fraternity is slowing loosing its foothold on campus, it is dangerously close to having people forget it ever existed on this campus. If it wants to come back, which alumni are making it fairly obvious that they would support an attempt, it has to be now.

It may not be ideal, but it would benefit both parties involved.


The RIGHT pledge class, not any old pledge class you YOU and your brothers decided to vote in. Choose better pledges and you'll get better brothers. Don't choose just to get numbers.

DEVODUDE 04-21-2010 10:44 AM

ree-Xi: Don't choose just to get numbers.

Excellent Point!!!!! Numbers do not mean S**T if they are not producing any results.

violetpretty 04-21-2010 11:29 AM

Though I do know a lot about NPC extension, I'll admit I am no expert on NIC extension procedures. Still, I'd imagine the school has to approve the recolonization of Strong Southern Fraternity, and it would be up to those two parties to decide when the best time to return would be, and that may very well be AFTER you graduate.

Strong Southern Fraternity will be back at your SEC school at some point if they are as strong in the South as you say they are. They probably own their house. Point is, it's a matter of when, not if, and they don't need you to help them. The decision of when they return is not going to be up to you. Why would they even want a group of guys with no concept of loyalty recruiting members for them?

North-South differences aside, I'm sorry your chapter became something you don't like. I'm sorry you're in the minority. I'm sorry you've given up trying to improve your chapter. But most of all, I'm sorry that you don't give a shit about your alumni membership to the point where you'd throw it away to be able to say that you "helped" a strong, presitigious organization that doesn't need your help in the first place.

Your fraternity is so much bigger than your chapter. You might find that you connect with members from other chapters (from the South, of course:rolleyes:) when you are an alumnus. College is 4 (or maybe 5 or 6) years, and your alumni membership is for the rest of your life. If you keep your membership, you can help your own chapter recolonize once the ding-dongs manage to get themselves kicked off as well.

ETA: Out of 80 members, 15-20 who give a shit about the chapter and work to enact change ARE enough.

33girl 04-21-2010 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticCat (Post 1919033)
Well, if breathesgelatin is around, she can fill us in on what happened at W&L when she was there -- there's a thread about somewhere around here. Definitely the exception, though.

I think that was a whole chapter though, not just the Ed Hardy-phobes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by violetpretty (Post 1919081)
ETA: Out of 80 members, 15-20 who give a shit about the chapter and work to enact change ARE enough.

The problem with that concept is that according to him, the other 60 members are happy as clams. I haven't heard him say that they're hazing, or that they're raping 13 year olds, or snorting smack off each other's butts, or in dire straits financially. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with this chapter except for the fact that they're "Northern." This doesn't mean they don't give a shit about the chapter. Unless they're having trouble $$ wise or RM wise, the national isn't going to recolonize them just because they don't fit in with the perceived notions of what a "good" fraternity is on campus. That's not how men operate.

als463 04-21-2010 12:38 PM

It took me about 2 seconds to figure out where this kid goes....I'm thinking Bama. It then took me another 3 seconds to figure out what fraternity he is in. I won't say out of respect for his Org. (even though he clearly doesn't have any respect for it). The point is, Jeff-you should just disaffiliate and stop making your GLO look bad. I have horrible sleuth skills and there are many GCers on here who have 99% better sleuth skills than me and I would be willing to put money on it that you attend either Bama (I won't say how I know that) or...at least LSU. Just remember that just because some of us may not attend your school, doesn't mean we don't have brothers/ sisters who attend it. Discretion is key.

MysticCat 04-21-2010 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 33girl (Post 1919128)
I think that was a whole chapter though, not just the Ed Hardy-phobes.

It was. And I think it was a whole chapter losing its charter, too.

violetpretty 04-21-2010 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 33girl (Post 1919128)
The problem with that concept is that according to him, the other 60 members are happy as clams. I haven't heard him say that they're hazing, or that they're raping 13 year olds, or snorting smack off each other's butts, or in dire straits financially. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with this chapter except for the fact that they're "Northern." This doesn't mean they don't give a shit about the chapter. Unless they're having trouble $$ wise or RM wise, the national isn't going to recolonize them just because they don't fit in with the perceived notions of what a "good" fraternity is on campus. That's not how men operate.

Oh I agree...he hasn't said that there was an actual problem. I was just trying to make the point that 15-20 out of 80 is enough to make change, just in a general sense. To put it in Phired Up terms, 15-20 "horses" can make an impact in a chapter of 80 if the rest are mules.

DrPhil 04-21-2010 02:19 PM

Hmmm. Is that supposedly how women operate?

violetpretty 04-21-2010 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1919191)
Hmmm. Is that supposedly how women operate?

Well, there was an instance with one NPC that did that and made national news about 5 years ago...but their National Council has since been replaced. Even then, they were a small chapter and I'm assuming they had financial problems as a result. So it wasn't just about image.

DrPhil 04-21-2010 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by violetpretty (Post 1919210)
Well, there was an instance with one NPC that did that and made national news after 5 years ago...but their National Council has since been replaced.

Instead of saying men or women, it's really just about how organizations, in general, operate given the right context or influence. People will be surprised the fraternity things that happen that defy notions of how "men operate."

knight_shadow 04-21-2010 04:14 PM

This is the dumbest goddamn thread I've read in a while.

Elephant Walk 04-21-2010 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gusteau (Post 1918972)
I think I remember Elephant Walk saying that HQ always sends "their weirdest yankees" around for colonization, lol.

Haha I did, and it's a fact.

Besides that, JC this is a dumb thread. I get trying to change it, but I would just go desperate and disaffiliate.

Oh and...

Let me out you:
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:Q...MwX_WwL8Pl.jpg
You've done pretty well in the MLS these last couple years Jeff Cunningham, but I think you're a bit old to be posting about changing your fraternity around.


Oh and any bets on the actual house? I'm trying to think of the newer houses there. I thought he might be a Phi Sig for a bit from Arkansas.

Barbie's_Rush 04-21-2010 07:14 PM

I realize just how much dumbassity people are capable of when they come to GC, but this one just seems to be a little too easy. Dude gave his full name and practically drew a map to his chapter house. I sort of think that maybe someone who doesn't like things Jeff might be doing in his current chapter may have been the ones who read The Art of War and The Prince.

That said, if the other fraternity was "kicked off" campus a few years ago, you can dream all you want about it being recolonized. It doesn't matter what the alumni want, there was obviously a reason why they were shut down and the school and nationals may have very different visions about if and when the chapter can be recolonized. I know fraternities work differently, but seems to me that it would require a lot more than a few cargo-short-phobes who've abandoned their own fraternity pleading to "help" re-establish a chapter.

33girl 04-21-2010 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by violetpretty (Post 1919183)
Oh I agree...he hasn't said that there was an actual problem. I was just trying to make the point that 15-20 out of 80 is enough to make change, just in a general sense. To put it in Phired Up terms, 15-20 "horses" can make an impact in a chapter of 80 if the rest are mules.

But they're not mules. They're horses of a different color. I agree with you, but that really is not the situation as good old JC has laid it out.

And as far as the men/women question...maybe there is one instance that made national news, but it sure as hell hasn't been the only instance that existed, and in that instance, it was clarified that financial problems were NOT a factor.

DrPhil 04-21-2010 09:52 PM

LOL @ EW...Jamaica, Jamaica!

I hear ya, 33girl...in this instance and every instance...in that instance. :p

Elephant Walk 04-22-2010 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1919364)
LOL @ EW...Jamaica, Jamaica!

Jeff Cunningham should have stayed with Jamaican team. He would've played pretty regularly. He's one of my favorite MLS'ers.

breathesgelatin 05-10-2010 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticCat (Post 1919033)
Well, if breathesgelatin is around, she can fill us in on what happened at W&L when she was there -- there's a thread about somewhere around here. Definitely the exception, though.

I'm here, just in time to save the day!

Yes, this happened while I was at W&L, my junior year.

Sigma Phi Epsilon was kicked off campus over the summer of 2003.

That fall the brothers of SigEp (or SPE in old school W&L parlance) decided to go in together and pledge Alpha Delta Phi and try to conduct rush from an off campus house (all the recognized fraternities at W&L were housed). They all resigned their membership in SigEp, although SigEp refused to release them from their membership obligations. In defiance, they were initiated into Alpha Delta Phi anyway.

Alpha Delta Phi (formerly SigEp) failed to receive recognition by the W&L's local IFC, and they failed to get any freshmen to pledge their fraternity come January (W&L has deferred recruitment). So, essentially, the chapter had folded by the end of the 2003-2004 schoolyear.

Some (not all) of those same brothers THEN joined Phi Kappa Psi, a fraternity which had traditionally been at the top of the mid tier at W&L, but had experienced some problems in recent years. I heard that some of these members were even initiated into Phi Kappa Psi but I have no idea if that is 100% accurate or not. Possibly they were just social members who lived/ate at the house and the initiation story was just braggadocio. It is certainly true that some of these members participated in national Phi Kappa Psi events and claim this affiliation on their facebook pages to this day, etc. So possibly, some of these guys had experienced three fraternity initiations.

At the time of this occurrence there was a lot of discussion on campus over whether SigEp might sue Alpha Delta Phi for initiating the members that SigEp refused to release, but I think SigEp just figured it wasn't worth the effort.

The differences were: SigEp as a whole was kicked off entirely, the entire chapter attempted to affiliate with Alpha Delta Phi, and Alpha Delta Phi was clearly a 'downgrade' from SigEp.

I know that Alpha Delta Phi has on other occasions colonized deactivated chapters of other fraternities (in fact there is a guy on GreekChat who will come and defend these actions to his dying breath), but I don't really think that Alpha Delta Phi would be the type of fraternity the OP is interested in. I don't think any 'legit southern fraternity' would ever pull this kind of shit.

Sasha112 05-20-2010 04:53 AM

Is it normal for Fraternities that get kicked off campus to change to a different organization? How often does it occur?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.