GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Entertainment (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=205)
-   -   Miss California USA posed topless (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=105220)

AGDee 05-06-2009 01:03 PM

I see nothing wrong with those pictures. I see no nudity, nothing that couldn't be shown on TV or that you don't see in a clothing catalogue. As demonstrated, there is no more skin than in the swimsuit competition. I don't think anybody bothers to come up with dirt on the first runner up. Nobody ever cares about the first runner up. The winner, sure! Look at Vanessa Williams, but not the first runner up. The whole thing is silly.

KSigkid 05-06-2009 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Senusret I (Post 1806811)
Why is anyone ever a pageant judge? They get people who are celebrity-esque and available.

Yep - and it's an easy way to stay relevant and get on TV. It makes sense for all involved.

Munchkin03 05-06-2009 01:53 PM

If this is all there is, I don't see the uproar. Vanessa Williams's pictures were far, far more scandalous.

Plenty of people are against gay marriage, but don't consider themselves "conservative" or "traditional." I'm not sure how hypocritical that is, but I think a lot of people on the left equate being against gay marriage with being generally conservative--even personally conservative, when that's not the case.

honeychile 05-06-2009 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AGDee (Post 1806828)
I see nothing wrong with those pictures. I see no nudity, nothing that couldn't be shown on TV or that you don't see in a clothing catalogue. As demonstrated, there is no more skin than in the swimsuit competition. I don't think anybody bothers to come up with dirt on the first runner up. Nobody ever cares about the first runner up. The winner, sure! Look at Vanessa Williams, but not the first runner up. The whole thing is silly.

I agree. The average Victoria's Secret catalog shows about the same amount of skin, yet nobody blasts a woman for shopping there.

a.e.B.O.T. 05-06-2009 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by honeychile (Post 1806850)
I agree. The average Victoria's Secret catalog shows about the same amount of skin, yet nobody blasts a woman for shopping there.

Well, you don't see those Victoria's Secret girls handing out any christian pamphlets either...

texas*princess 05-06-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by honeychile (Post 1806850)
I agree. The average Victoria's Secret catalog shows about the same amount of skin, yet nobody blasts a woman for shopping there.

I absolutely agree, but the Victoria's Secret models didn't sign anything saying they wouldn't be nude or semi-nude

deepimpact2 05-06-2009 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by texas*princess (Post 1806875)
I absolutely agree, but the Victoria's Secret models didn't sign anything saying they wouldn't be nude or semi-nude

Well if they aren't supposed to appear even semi-nude, then that means that they should do away with the swimsuit portion of the pageant.

texas*princess 05-06-2009 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepimpact2 (Post 1806876)
Well if they aren't supposed to appear even semi-nude, then that means that they should do away with the swimsuit portion of the pageant.

Yea maybe they should. I don't really know what their perception of "semi-nude" is or if being in a 2-pc swimsuit is considered 'semi nude'

BabyPiNK_FL 05-06-2009 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepimpact2 (Post 1806743)
As far as those who feel she didn't answer the question directly, I guess I don't see why people feel that way. I thought the question was how she felt about gay marriage or whether she supported it and she basically said no.

For the millionth time- she was NEVER asked her opinion of gay marriage at ANY point during the question Perez Hilton asked. Can someone please post the entire question again please?

KSigkid 05-06-2009 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BabyPiNK_FL (Post 1806899)
For the millionth time- she was NEVER asked her opinion of gay marriage at ANY point during the question Perez Hilton asked. Can someone please post the entire question again please?

The question was whether or not every state should legalize gay marriage, right?

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/...7381893&page=1

a.e.B.O.T. 05-06-2009 05:06 PM

She could of easily of said something about state's rights, and the beauty of diversity within the country... she started with that by talking about choice, but went into personal opinion, which was unnecessary in regards to whether she supports it. However, she chose to bring in her opinion and her christianity onto national television in a competition where she would represent America. She has a right to her opinion, and though I do not support her view, I do not think a view like that would be unrepresentative of America. However, the mention of christian values to the public eye puts her publicly against christian standards, and thus rises the disappointment of the photos at hand. She did not deserve the bashing of Perez Hilton, but she does deserve the disappointment from the revealing photos.

deepimpact2 05-06-2009 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BabyPiNK_FL (Post 1806899)
For the millionth time- she was NEVER asked her opinion of gay marriage at ANY point during the question Perez Hilton asked. Can someone please post the entire question again please?

Based on the question that was posted, it DOES in fact appear she was asked her opinion on gay marriage.

deepimpact2 05-06-2009 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OTW (Post 1806964)
He asked her if EVERY STATE SHOULD FOLLOW SUIT.

I don't know how you seem to think that he was asking for her opinion on gay marriage.

Take the crown away from her already and let's be done with her!

And that's not asking her for HER opinion on the issue???

Jimmy Choo 05-06-2009 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepimpact2 (Post 1806997)
And that's not asking her for HER opinion on the issue???

No it's not. You can have an opinion on an issue that varies from the law. it happens with politicians all the time. It can happen with beauty queens too.

deepimpact2 05-06-2009 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OTW (Post 1807000)
You say tomahto.

I think if Perez wanted to know her opinion on the issue, he would have asked for it. In the above question, I don't think he did.

So if he wasn't asking for her opinion, then what was he asking for?

deepimpact2 05-06-2009 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy Choo (Post 1807015)
No it's not. You can have an opinion on an issue that varies from the law. it happens with politicians all the time. It can happen with beauty queens too.

There is no real law on this issue so yes, it is her opinion.

Kevin 05-06-2009 10:32 PM

..........................................._______ _
....................................,.-'"...................``~.,
.............................,.-"..................................."-.,
.........................,/...............................................":,
.....................,?........................... ...........................\,
.................../.................................................. .........,}
................./.................................................. ....,:`^`..}
.............../.................................................. .,:"........./
..............?.....__............................ .............:`.........../
............./__.(....."~-,_..............................,:`........../
.........../(_...."~,_........"~,_....................,:`..... ..._/
..........{.._$;_......"=,_......."-,_.......,.-~-,},.~";/....}
...........((.....*~_......."=-._......";,,./`..../"............../
...,,,___.\`~,......"~.,....................`..... }............../
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-"
............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../\
.............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__
,,_..........}.>-._\...................................|........... ...`=~-,
.....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\
...................`=~-,,.\,...............................\
................................`:,,.............. .............`\..............__
.....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``
........................................_\........ ..._,-%.......`\
...................................,<`.._|_,-&``................`

deepimpact2 05-06-2009 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OTW (Post 1807024)
If she thought other states should also legalize same sex marriage.

He did not ask for her opinion on same sex marriage.

Even a retard could follow.

Don't you think her personal opinion is going to come into play if he asks her what she THINKS? If she is personally against same sex marriage would she feel that other states should follow?

Jimmy Choo 05-06-2009 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepimpact2 (Post 1807032)
Don't you think her personal opinion is going to come into play if he asks her what she THINKS? If she is personally against same sex marriage would she feel that other states should follow?

For the love of god.....NO!!!!

People can have one opinion but see the law as something different. And quite frankly going around in circles with you on this is just absurd. Your question has been answered like six times over by now. I used to compete in pageants. You are taught NOT to answer with your opinion. Several examples have been given in this thread of exactly what her answer should have been. End. Of. Discussion.

deepimpact2 05-06-2009 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy Choo (Post 1807038)
For the love of god.....NO!!!!

People can have one opinion but see the law as something different. And quite frankly going around in circles with you on this is just absurd. Your question has been answered like six times over by now. I used to compete in pageants. You are taught NOT to answer with your opinion. Several examples have been given in this thread of exactly what her answer should have been. End. Of. Discussion.

No, my question hasn't been answered. You and OTW are just typing absolute nonsense. She was asked for her opinion plain and simple. There is no LAW saying that same-sex marriage should be legalized in the remaining states. And if someone asks you what you THINK about a matter, they are asking for your OPINION. :cool:

DrPhil 05-06-2009 11:05 PM

begin too damn long post/

LOL...I've decided that this really isn't about the pageant or these specific young ladies. This has become something greater. People have used this to reinforce liberal vs. conservative (those categories and "battles" annoy me, but okay) values.

Yes, he was asking her personal opinion but on a very specific application--not a general one. This young lady said "everyone has a right to choose" which as someone already noted, isn't true based on the legality of it all. But if she had stayed on this route, she could've perhaps said that people SHOULD have the right to choose and that states have the right to weight the pros and cons ON THEIR OWN and follow Iowa's lead, if need be. Or express that she thinks states SHOULDN'T but do so without being personal. Then we wouldn't know or care what she personally thinks about gays and/or gay marriage.

This isn't about political correctness, absent freedom of speech, or denying Christianity (which, as a Christian, I find to be the dumbest platform for Christians to jump on--conservative or not). It is about being smart enough (despite nervousness) to know what you are being asked and think about the context. That applies to pageants where they are trained to do so, and for nonpageants where adults learn how to discuss topics with others.

If you stick your foot in your mouth, just acknowledge that you did that. Don't make yourself into a martyr and pretend you did it on purpose. I also don't think people should be trying to ruin this young lady for incorrectly answering the question with her opinion. Afterall, incorrectly answering the question was her only gaffe. What she actually thinks about gay marriage is of no concern, unless she were to turn her opinions into discriminatory actions.

/end too damn long post

agzg 05-06-2009 11:10 PM

Oh goody - another "you don't understand" "ANSWER MY DAMN QUESTION" thread.

texas*princess 05-07-2009 08:15 AM

lolz - Miss California (for now) offered $1 Million for adult entertainment film

SydneyK 05-07-2009 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin (Post 1807023)
..........................................._______ _
....................................,.-'"...................``~.,
.............................,.-"..................................."-.,
.........................,/...............................................":,
.....................,?........................... ...........................\,
.................../.................................................. .........,}
................./.................................................. ....,:`^`..}
.............../.................................................. .,:"........./
..............?.....__............................ .............:`.........../
............./__.(....."~-,_..............................,:`........../
.........../(_...."~,_........"~,_....................,:`..... ..._/
..........{.._$;_......"=,_......."-,_.......,.-~-,},.~";/....}
...........((.....*~_......."=-._......";,,./`..../"............../
...,,,___.\`~,......"~.,....................`..... }............../
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-"
............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../\
.............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__
,,_..........}.>-._\...................................|........... ...`=~-,
.....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\
...................`=~-,,.\,...............................\
................................`:,,.............. .............`\..............__
.....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``
........................................_\........ ..._,-%.......`\
...................................,<`.._|_,-&``................`

lol @ Kevin's artwork! I wonder how long it took to do that.

scbelle 05-07-2009 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by texas*princess (Post 1807119)

lolz-- what is it with Vivid offering $1 Million to women during their 15 minutes of fame? First the Octomom, now Prejean... I don't recall them doing that before (not that I paid attention), but it's starting to get a very Larry Flynt-ish feeling to it.

texas*princess 05-07-2009 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scbelle (Post 1807129)
lolz-- what is it with Vivid offering $1 Million to women during their 15 minutes of fame? First the Octomom, now Prejean... I don't recall them doing that before (not that I paid attention), but it's starting to get a very Larry Flynt-ish feeling to it.

maybe they're just doing it to see if they'll take it. Plus it lets them ride the coattails momentarily? hehehe who knows!

MysticCat 05-07-2009 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepimpact2 (Post 1807044)
No, my question hasn't been answered. You and OTW are just typing absolute nonsense. She was asked for her opinion plain and simple. There is no LAW saying that same-sex marriage should be legalized in the remaining states. And if someone asks you what you THINK about a matter, they are asking for your OPINION. :cool:

She was asked her opinion on whether other states should follow Vermont's (and Iowa's, Massachusetts' and New Hamphire's (?)) lead by legalizing gay marriage. It is quite possible to answer that question without ever stating one's personal opinion on gay marriage, and that is the distinction others are properly making and you are missing. For example:
Well, Perez, I think that the genius of our federal system is that it allows each state to make up its own mind about these things. As Justice Brandeis said, there must be power in the states to remould, through experimentation, our institutions to meet changing social needs, and that one of the "happy incidents" of our federal system that a single state may, if its citizens so choose, serve as a laboratory and try new things without risk to the rest of the country. So I trust the citizens of each state to decide for themselves what course to follow, and I trust that the decisions already made in Vermont and elsewhere -- and the experiences that result from those decisions -- can assist the remaining states in deciding for themselves.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin (Post 1807023)
..........................................._______ _
....................................,.-'"...................``~.,
.............................,.-"..................................."-.,
.........................,/...............................................":,
.....................,?........................... ...........................\,
.................../.................................................. .........,}
................./.................................................. ....,:`^`..}
.............../.................................................. .,:"........./
..............?.....__............................ .............:`.........../
............./__.(....."~-,_..............................,:`........../
.........../(_...."~,_........"~,_....................,:`..... ..._/
..........{.._$;_......"=,_......."-,_.......,.-~-,},.~";/....}
...........((.....*~_......."=-._......";,,./`..../"............../
...,,,___.\`~,......"~.,....................`..... }............../
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-"
............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../\
.............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__
,,_..........}.>-._\...................................|........... ...`=~-,
.....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\
...................`=~-,,.\,...............................\
................................`:,,.............. .............`\..............__
.....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``
........................................_\........ ..._,-%.......`\
...................................,<`.._|_,-&``................`

This is so a portrait of me reading this thread!

Brilliant!!

SydneyK 05-07-2009 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticCat (Post 1807139)
It is quite possible to answer that question without ever stating one's personal opinion on gay marriage, and that is the distinction others are properly making and you are missing. For example:
Well, Perez, I think that the genius of our federal system is that it allows each state to make up its own mind about these things. As Justice Brandeis said, there must be power in the states to remould, through experimentation, our institutions to meet changing social needs, and that one of the "happy incidents" of our federal system that a single state may, if its citizens so choose, serve as a laboratory and try new things without risk to the rest of the country. So I trust the citizens of each state to decide for themselves what course to follow, and I trust that the decisions already made in Vermont and elsewhere -- and the experiences that result from those decisions -- can assist the remaining states in deciding for themselves.


I'm LOLing at imagining MysticCat giving such a great answer as a pageant contestant. :D


Kevin 05-07-2009 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SydneyK (Post 1807123)
lol @ Kevin's artwork! I wonder how long it took to do that.

I cut/pasted it.

I don't have a single iota of artistic talent.

-- nonetheless, it belongs here.

texas*princess 05-07-2009 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SydneyK (Post 1807148)

I'm LOLing at imagining MysticCat giving such a great answer as a pageant contestant. :D


me too. that's brilliant!

texas*princess 05-07-2009 11:23 AM

Liar Liar, pink panties on fire
 
TMZ reports that Photo #2 has hit the web on thedirty.com. Carrie told pageant officials that the photo that hit the internets earlier this week was the "only" one she took and there were no other photos.

Story is here: TMZ article

honeychile 05-07-2009 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticCat (Post 1807139)
She was asked her opinion on whether other states should follow Vermont's (and Iowa's, Massachusetts' and New Hamphire's (?)) lead by legalizing gay marriage. It is quite possible to answer that question without ever stating one's personal opinion on gay marriage, and that is the distinction others are properly making and you are missing. For example:
Well, Perez, I think that the genius of our federal system is that it allows each state to make up its own mind about these things. As Justice Brandeis said, there must be power in the states to remould, through experimentation, our institutions to meet changing social needs, and that one of the "happy incidents" of our federal system that a single state may, if its citizens so choose, serve as a laboratory and try new things without risk to the rest of the country. So I trust the citizens of each state to decide for themselves what course to follow, and I trust that the decisions already made in Vermont and elsewhere -- and the experiences that result from those decisions -- can assist the remaining states in deciding for themselves.

This is why I heart you so much - you actually think that the average beauty pagaent queen knows about Justice Brandeis! No one could ever accuse you of misogyny!

Jimmy Choo 05-07-2009 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticCat (Post 1807139)
She was asked her opinion on whether other states should follow Vermont's (and Iowa's, Massachusetts' and New Hamphire's (?)) lead by legalizing gay marriage. It is quite possible to answer that question without ever stating one's personal opinion on gay marriage, and that is the distinction others are properly making and you are missing. For example:
Well, Perez, I think that the genius of our federal system is that it allows each state to make up its own mind about these things. As Justice Brandeis said, there must be power in the states to remould, through experimentation, our institutions to meet changing social needs, and that one of the "happy incidents" of our federal system that a single state may, if its citizens so choose, serve as a laboratory and try new things without risk to the rest of the country. So I trust the citizens of each state to decide for themselves what course to follow, and I trust that the decisions already made in Vermont and elsewhere -- and the experiences that result from those decisions -- can assist the remaining states in deciding for themselves.

Perfect answer!

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepimpact2 (Post 1807044)
No, my question hasn't been answered. You and OTW are just typing absolute nonsense. She was asked for her opinion plain and simple. There is no LAW saying that same-sex marriage should be legalized in the remaining states. And if someone asks you what you THINK about a matter, they are asking for your OPINION. :cool:

See above. And don't say that people are typing nonsense. For the millionth time someone gives an example of the answer you give to a question like that. If this latest example doesn't show you how she wasn't being asked her opinion then nothing will.

KSigkid 05-07-2009 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticCat (Post 1807139)
She was asked her opinion on whether other states should follow Vermont's (and Iowa's, Massachusetts' and New Hamphire's (?)) lead by legalizing gay marriage. It is quite possible to answer that question without ever stating one's personal opinion on gay marriage, and that is the distinction others are properly making and you are missing. For example:
Well, Perez, I think that the genius of our federal system is that it allows each state to make up its own mind about these things. As Justice Brandeis said, there must be power in the states to remould, through experimentation, our institutions to meet changing social needs, and that one of the "happy incidents" of our federal system that a single state may, if its citizens so choose, serve as a laboratory and try new things without risk to the rest of the country. So I trust the citizens of each state to decide for themselves what course to follow, and I trust that the decisions already made in Vermont and elsewhere -- and the experiences that result from those decisions -- can assist the remaining states in deciding for themselves.

Haha...this may sound a bit insensitive, but I would be SHOCKED if any pageant contestant gave this type of answer. I think most answers would have included some sort of opinon, whether it was the one given by Miss California, or something along the lines of "I think everyone should have the right to marry."

ASUADPi 05-11-2009 01:37 AM

Here's my question. If CA is forced to give up her crown and her 1st runner up takes over, does her 1st runner up automatically take over as 1st runner up for Miss USA?

Honestly, if I competed in Miss USA and was one of the top five I would be royally pissed if some girl who didn't even win the crown (CA) got to be a first runner up (Miss USA) and possibly take the Miss USA crown, if USA wins Universe. To me that wouldn't seem quite fair. But maybe it's just me.

Has anyone participated in pageants or know enough about pageants to answer the question?

texas*princess 05-11-2009 02:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASUADPi (Post 1808007)
Here's my question. If CA is forced to give up her crown and her 1st runner up takes over, does her 1st runner up automatically take over as 1st runner up for Miss USA?

Honestly, if I competed in Miss USA and was one of the top five I would be royally pissed if some girl who didn't even win the crown (CA) got to be a first runner up (Miss USA) and possibly take the Miss USA crown, if USA wins Universe. To me that wouldn't seem quite fair. But maybe it's just me.

Has anyone participated in pageants or know enough about pageants to answer the question?

I don't think Miss Malibu (the Miss Cali runner up) will be the 1st Runner up of Miss USA.

The whole purpose of having other "runners up" is to have someone to take the place if the person before them can't preform their duties.

So let's say Miss Malibu becomes Miss California. Then Miss USA wins Miss Universe. Since the original Miss California can't preform her duties, the 2nd runner up will step in as the new Miss USA.

That's the way I understood it anyway

dekeguy 05-11-2009 10:55 AM

Does anybody really give a rat's rump about all of this?

WCsweet<3 05-11-2009 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASUADPi (Post 1808007)

Has anyone participated in pageants or know enough about pageants to answer the question?

Alright so I asked a friend, Miss USA does not have a platform. Miss America does.

Jimmy Choo 05-11-2009 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASUADPi (Post 1808007)
Here's my question. If CA is forced to give up her crown and her 1st runner up takes over, does her 1st runner up automatically take over as 1st runner up for Miss USA?

Honestly, if I competed in Miss USA and was one of the top five I would be royally pissed if some girl who didn't even win the crown (CA) got to be a first runner up (Miss USA) and possibly take the Miss USA crown, if USA wins Universe. To me that wouldn't seem quite fair. But maybe it's just me.

Has anyone participated in pageants or know enough about pageants to answer the question?

If Miss CA USA looses her title Miss CA 1st runner up takes her spot. However if Miss USA wins Miss Universe the Miss USA title would go to the 2nd runner up which would be Miss Arizona USA.

SydneyK 05-12-2009 11:39 AM

Trump says she can keep the crown: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_miss_california

All the related drama can go away now.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.