MysticCat |
11-04-2008 04:59 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid
(Post 1740034)
Do you think they make more than Matt Lauer makes on the Clinton payroll? ;)
|
As a group or just, say, Sean Hannity? http://smilieshq.com/smilies/rolleye0012.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by kafromTN
(Post 1740037)
Check out the CMPA.
To explain it's like a -10 to +10 number line, with 0 being absolutely neutral, Foxnews is a +3 while CNN, MSNBC, CBS etc are -7s or -8s. I never said they were not slanted, but they are slanted less than the others.
CNN, MSNBC, CBS etc probably are on the Obama payroll. I like to look at both sides, I have a viewpoint b/c I do look at both sides of an issue.
Don't worry I'm not a McCain supporter, but in politics today I'm forced to vote for the lesser of evils.
|
You mean the CMPA that a former FoxNews contributor founded? That CMPA? I'm afraid I take them with a grain of salt.
To be clear, I wasn't meaning to suggest that Fox is slanted while other news sources lack biases of some kind. In fact, I tried to imply otherwise. I think it's better to admit that than to pretend they are objective (or fair or balanced). But, just based on my own observations, I just can't agree that Fox is the most balanced of them. Not saying it's the worst (in terms of objectivity -- I mean, there is still MSNBC), but I can't say it's the best either.
|