![]() |
Quote:
I misquoted as I was just remembering off the top of my head. Watch the link to get the information then you can argue it. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Daily Show is political entertainment. I don't find it entertaining so why would I watch it? It's just kind of "Oooh, Republicans, burn" kind of humor. Perhaps if Obama wins, I will find new enjoyment, who knows? (It's not like I'm Rush, Fox, O'Reilly-ing it up either.) ETA: Only because you threw out Fair and Balanced, do you really imagine that a comparable clip couldn't be put together with Democrats, maybe on the topic of the value of experience or women in positions of authority? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As I said, if I had enjoyed the Daily Show when I watched it, I would be a regular viewer. I didn't, so I'm not. I don't need to see a string of Republicans contradicting themselves. It's not at all surprising, educational, or entertaining that they would do so. It's just the way stuff goes in a two party, highly partisan system. What I wanted to point out was that Palin herself hadn't yet played that game. |
I don't know what game you're referring to, but really, I don't care at this point. You are obviously a huge Palin fan and that's super, I can't fathom your viewpoint and I'm sure you can't fathom mine, so let's just KIM.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
ETA: And wait, when did I make an issue out of saying Palin was playing "a game" like that? You have me confused with another poster. |
Quote:
All I ask it that it be a good for the goose kind of thing. We can attribute everything that happens for Palin as a result of her team as long as we hold Obama/Biden to the same standard. |
Quote:
Did the story mention that she billed about 450K less than her predecessor? That might be kind of important. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It sounds like a great idea, but how? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.