![]() |
I knew this would happen. All they had was a tape with a mole that wasn't showing up consistantly and a few witnesses who conflicted left and right. They couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it was him, so what did we all expect after hearing the "evidence"?
BTW-(Has anyone seen this tape? I haven't, but does it look like him at all?! Could it be mistaken or would you believe it to be R. Kelly? From what I heard it sure looks like him, but that is all from people who don't know him nor have they seen him in person. Obviously most of you probably haven't either, just want to see what the perspectives are.) |
I hope no one will admit to having watched the tape of that grown man having sex with a teenager.
|
well, curiousity gets the best of folk. i've seen many of videos for the sake of them just being out.
*in no way is this an admission, i have not seen the R Kelly tape. |
You've seen many videos of underage people having sex with adults?
|
Quote:
Im thinking more along the lines of celeb sex tapes, whether they were leaked or intentionally put out. and maybe "many" was a bad choice of words. i've seen a couple videos that in retrospect, i was better off not looking at. darn curiousity! |
Whew...you had me nervous real quick. :)
People can watch whatever adult porn they want, celeb or not. Watching a sex tape of an adult and an underaged person is a whole new beast. Curiosity my arse. I remember when the tape first leaked and it was sold on the street corners and stuff. Police were threatening to arrest people on child porn charges. A couple of my dumbarse boys were saying "she didn't look like a kid...she was taking it like a woman." :rolleyes: That's what many pedophiles say. |
Quote:
yeah i couldnt believe the gall of bootleggers putting that stuff out for a quick buck. theres no amount of curiousity that would make me buy an illegal DVD of alleged child porn. what do you tell your peoples when youre charged in court? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Awww, Riley. Everyone's favorite little gangsta. I'm not surprised at all. This should have been an airtight case. The proof is the video, right? But, another weak prosecution led to a celebrity acquittal. Our tax dollars at work, everyone. |
Ok, I'll admit it, but I was DUPED!
I'm soooo late on this, but back to the original post:
If an adult woman and an adult man have a threesome with an underaged child, why is he the only pedophile? He's a pedophile, and she's a star witness. I'll admit that I saw a piece of the video. A guy friend gave it to me labeled as Madea's Family Reunion & told me to watch it. As soon as I saw what it was, I turned it off & called to give him a few choice words. He thought it was hilarious. I failed to find the humor. I'm not really a porn fan, and I definitely don't want to watch a child have sex. However, from the few seconds I saw, I don't recall another woman being in it. That means that the jury is just supposed to take her word for it? I would imagine that anyone who saw the tape & knows the youngster could identify her. To me, that key witness strategy sounded flimsy anyway. |
Quote:
|
Don't hate me!
Quote:
Quote:
BTW, this is clearly Jacko all over again. I just wanna point that out. |
Quote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zrAxrL_p39w I am guessing in addition to not listening to R Kelly's music, you don't watch the Boondocks either...am I correct? |
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.