Originally Posted by ThetaPrincess24 (Post 1626635)

So does it get preachy then after the 8th book? Are the authors trying to relate the plot and characters to scripture or are they disguising a sermon?

Originally Posted by Thetagirl218 (Post 1626471)

I am so glad carnation started this thread!

I am an avid Christian fiction reader.

I absolutely love Bodie and Brock Thoene, Francine Rivers, Dee Henderson, and Angela Hunt ( Her husband is actually one of the pastors at my church. Her works are known throughout FL, but are becoming more popular outside the state).

I also like Beverly Lewis and Karen Kingsbury, but I find both of these authors repeat their plots a lot.

As for the Left Behind Books, I grew up reading them. I think I started when the third one came out! I then had to throw each one against a wall after the ending and then wait a year for another to come out (There are 12!)

Honestly, in my opinion, only the first 8 are any good. They get to full of scripture after that. I mean that has its time in place, but if I wanted to read the Bible, I would open the actual book and not a work of fiction.

Originally Posted by Tom Earp (Post 1626927)

The Bible is fiction?

True or false?

It was mot writen whee Adam and Eve were there or Jesus was born.

Is was writen with hand me down stories. Lore.

But what is the amazing part is that many things that have been found in our age ends up being true.

Stranger than fiction?

If not for the Angliciacized verson, how true is it? The King James version for those that may not know.

Originally Posted by Drolefille (Post 1626972)

I'll come back and translate this later, I swear, I'm just quoting it for posterity at the moment. One of the more drunken posts I think.

Originally Posted by Tom Earp (Post 1626927)

The Bible is fiction?

True or false?

It was mot writen whee Adam and Eve were there or Jesus was born.

Is was writen with hand me down stories. Lore.

But what is the amazing part is that many things that have been found in our age ends up being true.

Stranger than fiction?

If not for the Angliciacized verson, how true is it? The King James version for those that may not know.

Originally Posted by Drolefille (Post 1626972)

I'll come back and translate this later, I swear, I'm just quoting it for posterity at the moment. One of the more drunken posts I think.

Originally Posted by Tom Earp (Post 1626927)

The Bible is fiction?

Originally Posted by Drolefille (Post 1627171)

This could either be a loaded question or I could have misplaced my punctuation, who knows!


Um false. No TRUE. No FALSE. TOO MANY CHOICES!

But it was writen... WHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.


Completely and totally like anything else that old. I mean they should have like, invented writing! Or used those Egyptian picture things!

Lore. He's funny.
I mean when I turned 102 I learned that I could not drink my age in shots anymore. Because I have no liver.


Stranger than Fiction Good movie.


Yes the Anglickiasizakeziid version. The only version in Anglicaneese is the King James Version. Because after James, no one translated the Bible any more, ever. I mean, if it weren't for the Anglikwwqnobwengcized version we'd never know how true is it.

Originally Posted by Drolefille (Post 1626972)

I'll come back and translate this later, I swear, I'm just quoting it for posterity at the moment. One of the more drunken posts I think.

Originally Posted by Tom Earp (Post 1627592)

Hope your GLO is proud of you and your members.:rolleyes: