![]() |
So we argue semantics, because for me this new generation really ranges from highschool-aged through college-aged (roughly 14-21). I had students who were freshman in college and had just made 16, 17 is pretty average.
|
Quote:
So without my going on my speech about what "generation" really constitutes, suffice it to say that I am talking about mobilizing people who are not legally adults. And I charge those who are legally adults with doing this, as well as older generations with mobilizing the younger generations of adults. One thing that I see as working on the local level is social action forums. What do you see as working on a local level? |
Quote:
|
@DSTCHAOS
I am not sure what can work in the long term for young people. I guess that one of the reasons that I think of the next generation as so young, age-wise, is because I am on the young side myself (under 30). This is one of the things that has continually frustrated me in my experience with activism is the sort of flash in the pan character it takes on not only with this younger generation, but with folks in my own generation. I have not seen much of an enduring commitment to social activism in the broader population, and that in part is due to the prevailing perspective on the state of union so to speak. I think that involvement in certain organizations is a good way to support sustained involvement with a myriad of issues. The work of our organizations is important to that end. I am interested in seeing how our group, formed as a result of our participation in a march in support of justice for the young men in Jena, fares, whether the intensity of interest continues as this moment recedes into the background. As an educator, of course, I am always in favor of using the classroom environment as a space to develop social consciousness in my students (which is not to say that I am on a soapbox in my classrooms (in fact, just the opposite, I rarely share my own opinions), but that I attempt to create a space where they can question and I hope that they carry that critical engagement with them into their everyday lives). @LadyGreek There were some semantics issues that we had to hash out there. |
It's funny seeing my type of wordiness in someone else's writing. ;)
Well, there's stuff going on all over the place but a lot of people need to see rallies to think that the community is protesting and change is going to happen. I would rather not see rallies and public protests because those aren't indicative of large scale and longterm change. The Jim Crow and Civil Rights Eras were times of more overt inequalities. There are now more institutional and covert inequalities that require less overt methods. If we can maintain conciousness and activity without needing the public spectacle, we will be able to reach the community through education and so forth. We need to continue to challenge one another to do better without feeling that such a challenge is an insult to our community. I'm not talking about the Bill Cosby speech type of challenge. I'm talking about a similar in-your-face approach that doesn't need the cameras and that pressures us to continue combating inequality through information and action rather than complaints. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.