![]() |
Quote:
|
Just finished reading the article.
Awful. Why was it necessary to say that you "don't want to perpetuate stereotypes...," then go on to list 4 stereotypes in the newspaper? (Especially since some of them had such negative connotations.) Wouldn't it have been sufficient to acknowledge that sterotypes exist, but PNMs are encouraged to disregard them? :confused: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I went looking for it on the IHQ but couldn't find anything. I suspect we do have one, but I haven't read it in a while. |
Poor Phi Mu.
|
What an absolutely dreadful article. I don't think even DG comes off well - they come off as jerks who spend $1000 on a purse.
What I want to know is, how much of that is true about skits and pref ceremonies being completely gone? I mean, I looked at those pictures, and contrary to what the article said, I didn't see a tank top or t-shirt in sight. |
I agree, poor Phi Mu! That is awful!
|
Some stereotypes have evolved- not done total 180s, but not quite the same as when I was there.
Some have not changed one bit. No matter how positive a stereotype could be, the way they said them came across as negative for all of them. When the truth is, the president of ZTA when I was there was a very sweet girl and honor student not into partying. And another honor student who was a Tri-Delta had long thick brown hair. And two girls from the campus church I attended- neither one of them overweight- were in Phi Mu. Bah humbug for stereotypes and so-called reputations. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.