![]() |
[QUOTE=ladygreek;1489275]
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Far be it for me to tell any of you who you should vote for, let me give you a bit of advice when pondering your decision(s).
Please understand that the state of this country is in dire straits: escalating Middle East war, declining dollar, inflation/high gas prices, rising foreclosures, tremendous national debt financed by a nation (China) on the verge of cashing it out, homeland "security" about to resort to extreme measures to keep us "safe", talks of a North America Union, etc, etc. This is not the time to select a candidate based on who gets the most airtime provided by Fox, CNN, or whatever news source you rely on. Do not let them inform you of who you "should" vote for. You must do your homework and research candidates thoroughly as to what matters most to you and which candidate's beliefs and agenda are most in line with yours. DO NOT vote for a candidate based on who you think is most likely to win. That's not voting, that's tantamount to gambling. Do not throw your ballot on the crap table. Moreover, do not let these candidates insult your intelligence by pandering to you because you belong to a certain minority or special interest group. We need to vote with wisdom in this next election; it could possibly be the most critical one in US history for the future of our nation. *steps down off soapbox* Having said that, now for my personal opinion: If the election comes down to Hilbama vs. Rudy McRomney, it's game over; The United States of America is TOAST! The next decade is going to be RADICALLY different in ways we we would've never believed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You know...I have been thoroughly researching each candidates and the jury is still out on this one. I guess it all comes down to proven track record and trust (even though candidates have been known to lie). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The reason candidates try and raise alot of money early on is because they want to "scare" other potential candidates from running. The media profits from this mad dash for cash (where do you think the money goes?!) so they want the electorate to believe that whoever raises the most amount of money wins.
The title of this thread buys into this hype...since they've raised the most amount of money why would anyone presume that either one of them would be the Democratic nominee? ( Clinton is a socialist and Obama doesn't have any goverance experience (if had been the governor of Illinois, he'd be much more prepared, historically, how many Senators have been president?) Bill Richardson would be a more formidable presidential candidate because he's more qualfied. |
Quote:
|
Obama and Clinton
MR OBAMA AS PRESIDENT AND MISS CLINTON as VP
OH YES I WOULD BUY THAT FOR A DOLLOR |
Clinton all the way!
|
I just skimmed through some of the post so I don't know if this question came up, but is it true that Obama is a Muslim?:confused:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.