![]() |
Quote:
|
this is possible
I know i phrased it differently...but if it reads all but 2 us presidents since 1825 were in a fraternity...when you define fraternity, you are saying brotherhood...its possible that this statistic could include presidents who were part of the masonry..im not saying that this statement is true but it is definitely possible..and you are correct i will retract my statement for lack of a source
|
^^^ You are right that Freemasonry is a fraternity ("brotherhood") in the broad sense, and I have no idea how many presidents have been Masons, but I think when a statement is made along the lines of "all but 2 US presidents since 1825 were in a fraternity," the almost universal understanding is going to be a collegiate, general (social) fraternity. This is especially true since this statistic is usually cited in rush materials or responses to criticisms of the Greek system.
This urban legend has been around a long time, and it pops up on GC from time to time. Funny the "myths" that grow up around GLOs. |
yeah, well at least I know now..I just always heard it so assumed it was true.
|
Quote:
Masonry as a fraternity preceded college fraternities as we know them today. Many founders of IFC fraternities were Masons and used Masonic principles and ceremonies in founding their own orgs. Sure, there's a semantic distinction between "college fraternity" and "any fraternity," and it might be slightly misleading to people who don't know about or understand Masonry, but Masonry was a fraternity LONG before your org was ever founded; know where you came from. ;) |
^^^ I know quite about Masonic history and the history of GLOs in general and particular. Thanks all the same. ;)
An understanding of connotation and common usage are key. While Masons and masonic writing frequently refer to Freemasonry as "the Fraternity," the general public doesn't. Indeed, you say "it might be slightly misleading to people who don't know about or understand Masonry." That would be the majority of Americans. Ask the average American what a "fraternity" is, and you're going to get a description of a college GLO. Anything beyond that would be viewed as a fraternity "in the broad sense" of the word, not the narrower but commonly assumed sense. That's why I said: "when a statement is made along the lines of 'all but 2 US presidents since 1825 were in a fraternity,' the almost universal understanding is going to be a collegiate, general (social) fraternity. This is especially true since this statistic is usually cited in rush materials or responses to criticisms of the Greek system." If the claim that "all but 2 US presidents since 1825 were in a fraternity," was meant to include Masons, then anybody wanting to be understood would say "all but 2 US presidents since 1825 were in fraternities and/or were Masons." Otherwise, it's a trick question. |
Being in a Fraternity is not ment to be just Social Greek Organizations.
Phi Beta Kappa is considered the first true Greek Organization in the USA! Kappa Sigma holds that they go back to Italy. Free Masons go back before any. Two Divisions: Knights Templer and Scottish Rite. Yes, many if not most of the Founding Fathers of America were Members. Many were members of the Greek Organizations that We know today as Social Organizations. Also, many GLOs did take parts of their Rituals from the Masonic Order.:) |
All of that is true, Tom. (Except that the two main appendant bodies, not divisions, of Freemasonry are the Scottish Rite and the York Rite. The Knights Templar is an order of the York Rite.)
And none of it changes the fact that to the average person, fraternity means collegiate GLO. You're talking about denotation; I'm talking about connotation. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.