Kevin |
08-03-2007 12:38 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorG
(Post 1496199)
Uh oh, out comes the "L Word". Isn't saying "Liberal Left" redundant?
I agree that the original controversy that lead to that story was blown way out of proportion, but it also contradicts the defense you just used about Lott being "young and naive" at the time. Since he publicly stated that he believes the country would be better if Thurmond had won the presidency, he obviously still supports the segregationist platform he ran on. I mean, Strom Thurmond is the guy who filibustered the Civil Rights Act.
At any rate, this is the wrong place to have this discussion, and all it will do is generate strife amongst brothers at this point.
|
Saying nice things at a colleague's 100th birthday party is hardly the same as announcing that one is a racist.
Lott, like most in the South at the time supported a segregationist policy. It doesn't make it right, but that was just the way the world was at the time.
That said, as bad as it was then, I don't really think you can hold someone's beliefs from 40+ years ago against them. People are capable of substantial change.
As for the secrecy of Grand Chapter, there are guests present for a great part of it (as far as I recall). I believe it's just the ritual part that's off limits to non members. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Talking about our past is important to understanding our present.
|