Originally Posted by SSS1365 (Post 1322141)

I'm just wondering what they're going to call it, since there's already a Randolph-Macon.

Originally Posted by alum (Post 1319737)

Hollins' undergraduate is all-women. The graduate programs are co-ed.

Originally Posted by Xylochick216 (Post 1322182)

There was a an article about this in our paper this morning. The board of trustees is voting next month on a new name. Many alumnae want to keep the initials R-MWC, but I doubt that will happen. No one is speculating on what it will be called.

The school decided this week to add 4 men's sports next fall in addition to adding them to the riding team. There's a huge sign on the walls of the school right now that says, "Football tryouts. When: Hell freezes over."

Originally Posted by breathesgelatin (Post 1389001)

It was announced in the last few days that it will be called "Randolph College."

Originally Posted by alum (Post 1389416)

I do find it interesting that some of the remaining women's colleges are among the strongest LACs in the country (Wellesley, Smith, Mt. Holyoke...) while the 2 remaining male colleges (Hampden-Sydney (also in that south-central area of VA) and Wabash (IN) are not attracting the same caliber of young men.

Apparently R-MWC used to have several NPC orgs. While not unprecedented, this was somewhat unusual for a women's college. I wonder if they will be allowed to/ be interested in recolonizing once the guys get there?

Originally Posted by breathesgelatin (Post 1389455)

On the first point that's certainly true. I think that it's because for some reason, an all-women's college is more appealing to women than an all-men's college is appealing to men. I guess guys just like us. :) I know that the primary reason W&L went co-ed is that admissions numbers were dropping and along with that the academic... er, strength of the student body was also dropping. Hampden-Sydney college is sort of infamous in the region. It was a fun place to visit but I think its academics may be suffering to some degree as well.

I know that a lot of the women's colleges in the area used to have NPC groups. Pi Phi had two such chapters, one of which was at Hollins. I forget where the other was. Mary Baldwin definitely had NPC groups as well, but these (like the others, I believe) in the first third or so of the 20th cent. They were certainly long-gone by the time my mom got there. I had some friends from MBC in undergrad who would have been interested in Greek Life but it's definitely not allowed there now by any means! I know that at least part of the rationale was "we're all sisters here;" it's meant to discourage cliques I think. Also, if I remember correctly, many of the women's colleges established student government at the same time they banned Greek Life.

Originally Posted by alum (Post 1389472)

I certainly can't speak for the success of any women's colleges but as usual I have a couple of opinions.

I think part of the success of Wellesley is that it has always been loosely connected with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Wellesley College (a stunning campus in its own right) is in a gorgeous Boston suburb with easy access to other colleges in the greater Boston area.

In terms of Mt. Holyoke and Smith, they are both member of the 5-College Consortium. Amherst and Hampshire Colleges and UMass Amherst make up the rest of the 5. There is a cross-registration agreement amongst the consortium

When I ws in college in the early '80s, Vassar had recently turned co-ed. A boy a couple of years ahead of me in prep school was one of the first male students at Vassar. W&L was undergoing the "Better Dead than Co-ed" debate. Not that Washington and Lee was ever on par with Hampden-Sydney in terms of student caliber, but they would not be the school they are today without the addition of women.

To be perfectly blunt (and when am I not?). H-SC is somewhat regarded as a men's finishing school. Instead of bringing your horse to college, you can bring your hunting dog and weapon. Still, they fill a niche for certain students.

Originally Posted by alum (Post 1389416)

I do find it interesting that some of the remaining women's colleges are among the strongest LACs in the country (Wellesley, Smith, Mt. Holyoke...) while the 2 remaining male colleges (Hampden-Sydney (also in that south-central area of VA) and Wabash (IN) are not attracting the same caliber of young men.

Originally Posted by ForeverRoses (Post 1389741)

I know a little about Wabash- two gentlemen that I work with attended college there. Wabash is a HUGE greek school. It is almost assumed that all freshman will join a fraternity. The one thing about Wabash that struck me as funny is that ALL freshmen are required to wear little freshmen beanie-cap things. If a particular fraternity would require that, it would be hazing, but since it is the entire school that requires it, apparently it is okay. :rolleyes:

Wabash is also located about 45 minutes from DePauw so there are females in close proximity to the school.

Originally Posted by centaur532 (Post 1389523)

I know girls from Mount Holyoke and Smith and it amuses me no end because most women who go to those colleges go to escape typical college life, of which greek life is a big part...yet they're basically in one big sorority. Their traditions, rituals, things like that.
I had friends from high school who went to Wells College, a small all-womens college in Aurora, NY. They had to go co-ed and no one was happy about it. I visited them over spring break when they were back home and was wearing a letter hoodie. My friend steph looked at it and said 'eeeeuwww' and I just replied with, "um...your college is one giant sorority, I wouldn't be talking."

Wells couldn't survive without going co-ed, as much as it pained them to do so.