Wolfman |
04-12-2006 05:20 PM |
It's not my intention to hijack this thread but I wanted to make a comment on why this 'award' may have been viewed as being appropriate. I'm not a racial demagogue but I do know that there is an imbalance in power in the broader society as it relates to this issue. As a black person, we are raised--or those of us who blessed to have such "raising"--to know that we will be often prejudged in all kinds of circumstances about our intelligence, morals,criminality,etc.; therefore one must dress appropriately, comport ourselves appropriately, speak Standard English, learn the social mores and customs of the wider society, be willing to fit in by taking up certain hobbies to make your way in the professional world, and be circumspect in our speech. This is how we deal with the so-called "Black Tax."
But for most whites, their livelihood or professional well-being is not related whatsoever to people of color. Thus there is a type of social invisibility when it comes to the calculus of racial sensitivity(I detest that term!) and the possibility of censure or receiving a sanction that harms them. This is especially true within the confines of homogenous social groups where this invisibility has free reign of expression. Only when an "interloper" actually calls them on this and there's some threat of censure by some body that does exercise authority over them is the offending behaviour or act become important. In reality, often this type of thing goes on without a hitch if they think a potentially offended party has no power or social standing, or someone they can appeal to, that is, if they are even aware of the ramifications of what they are doing.
|