My mama, a devout Catholic who usually finds most things sacreligious...even she thought it was a great piece.

She even went to say that she thought they would have had a prettier Jesus Christ. :p

Agreed. It's well done and tasteful, too.

If the Last Supper had been created by Jesus, that would be one thing.

Instead, it's an artist's rendering of a supposed event that happened like 2000 years ago whose creation would've been nearly 1500 years after the event.

That's a slippery slope to justify banning a painting. Other than it's obvious resemplance to Da Vinci's work, there is not catholic or christian about the picture.

Oh, just cover your virgin eyes or look away....this wouldn't be newsworthy if they didn't make such a fuss.

Leave it up. If it offends you, don't buy their clothing. Personally, I wouldn't - but that's my perogative.

In many parts of Europe, full frontal nudity isn't just accepted, it's the norm.

It's an imitation of a painting, ace - which wasn't done by God (unless you're way into Leonardo).

The MLK thing is blatant prejudism.

There was also a representation of the Last Supper in the movie version of M*A*S*H.

Link

So this is really nothing new - kind of derivative of whoever made the poster actually. There have been lots of other "recreations" of DaVinci's Last Supper.

If we could have hot men like that at our meetings I think they would be much more fun.

DA for national NPC president!! :)

*lol*

Now THAT was the funniest thing i read all day.

It took me a while looking at it to figure out what was "offensive" about it.
Yeah, I'm slow, but I'm old.:p

Heh.

Between this and the skater thing, you're on fire today, buddy.

I played Dr. King in a play once.

Dali also did his own version of the last super.

Italia=gov't changes entirely every four years or so, so not a big deal. Really, at all.

l'Republique [i guess thats right. I can't spell in english or german, my spelling in French is right out] well, seriously its not my government so I won't say anything, although I believe their Head of State and their Head of Government are two different people.

It should be banned because it promotes eating disorders and negative self-images.

-- that was the line of reasoning these countries used, I'm sure.