GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   What does the Bible say? (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=58577)

IowaStatePhiPsi 10-25-2004 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KSig RC
B.) What part of the US Constitution should be ignored by, say, the Supreme Court as being anachronistic or out of date? -or- When literally interpreted, which parts don't hold up today?

According to The Patriot Act... the First Amendment.

AlphaSigOU 10-25-2004 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by IowaStatePhiPsi
According to The Patriot Act... the First Amendment.
(tromp... tromp... tromp... "Raise high the flags! Stand rank on rank trogether... stormtroopers march with steady, quiet tread...")

KSig RC 10-25-2004 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by IowaStatePhiPsi
According to The Patriot Act... the First Amendment.

Cute (and, coincidently, maybe the third time ever I don't totally disagree w/ you) - but still doesn't answer the question . . .

AGDee 10-25-2004 06:13 PM

Our Constitution is a living document, meaning, it can be changed and has been changed. Prohibition is one example of something that was put in there and then taken out. A lot of things have been added as we've grown as a society such as civil rights. It does not stand exactly as it was when it was written.

Dee

PhiPsiRuss 10-25-2004 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AGDee
Our Constitution is a living document, meaning, it can be changed and has been changed. Prohibition is one example of something that was put in there and then taken out. A lot of things have been added as we've grown as a society such as civil rights. It does not stand exactly as it was when it was written.

Dee

And like with Prohibition, those changes should only occur with constitutional ammendments, and not through judicial reinterpretations.

IowaStatePhiPsi 10-26-2004 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PhiPsiRuss
And like with Prohibition, those changes should only occur with constitutional ammendments, and not through judicial reinterpretations.
wait- so Plessey vs. Ferguson was good, and the reinterpretation of the Constitution in Brown v. Board was a bad thing?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.