![]() |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Yep
Quote:
The Brennan Center in New York sued the state in federal court, alleging that the constitution deliberately disenfranchises felons, who disproportionately are black and male. The figure is nearly half a million who are permanently with out their voting rights. The ACLU filed a separate suit in state court, saying the corrections system did not inform inmates that they could file their clemency request paperwork prior to their release. The ACLU earlier accused Gov. Bush of making the process difficult in an attempt to prevent black men from being able to vote. Both of these cases have to go to trial. Who knows the outcome, but this is a huge issue with activists and groups that represent ex-felons. |
Re: Yep
Quote:
I work for the Probation Dept. and a lot of the felons on Probation have no idea they have the right to vote. We have the law posted all over our department, and we have voter registration cards on several tables throughout our offices. It's sad that felons are not being informed about this law in Ohio. There are a few other States that have a similar law, but I'm not sure which ones. |
Re: Yep
Quote:
But to answer the question of the poster.. YES their right to vote should be automatically restored if they were registered prior to their conviction.. |
Re: Re: Yep
Quote:
The ACLU has a national voting rights project that is addressing this nationally by getting all of us affiliates involved in our local areas. |
How can it vary state by state for a National election though?
Is there a federal statute discussing this? I didn't thinka state law could supersede federal law, and in the absence of a Law stating that felons can't vote, wouldn't the constitution take precedence? |
Re: Re: Re: Yep
Quote:
@ James, what article of the Constitution addresses the revocation of voting rights of convicted felons? |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Yep
Quote:
ETA: @ James, never mind...I know. |
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yep
Quote:
http://www.aclu.org/VotingRights/Vot...list.cfm?c=167 |
Live and learn
Quote:
|
Quote:
As long as states follow this, they are allowed to add any stipulations. It's a method of bounded discretion, which states that they can interpret a law as they see fit, as long as they follow precedence of the higher court/law. |
Quote:
The same goes for the registration process and time frames. As long as the process is not discriminatory, the states can act as they see fit. These things are seen as being consistent with federal law, not in conflict with it. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.