I said that a when the Iraqi situation became a "moral we go to get that bad man Saddam out because he's killing his own people" issue. When we realize that Iraq didn't have WMDs. But like I said, this was a war to make pockets fat and not to save anybody.

My question to you guys is was Saddam really the bad man that we said he was remember Saddam had a history and cozy relationship w/ America. In the late 70's it was he and he alone that broke rank w/ the other OPEC nations and sold oil to America.

P.S. ask Rumsfield how good of a spade player Saddam is.

You'll never get most of the Bush/Warhawks (who both won't see active duty) to admit to that. This MONSTER was made by the United States (especially good ole Ronnie and crew). Nobody cried bloody murder in the 80s when he was killing his people and/or torturing them. Heck, you can't get them to talk about getting the man who ACTUALLY HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH 9/11. But now it's all about freeing the Iraqi people from brutal conditions, while those good ole darkies in Africa just have to hope for the storm to pass over.:rolleyes:

The conservatives have morals alright, just two sets of them.

Well I'm convinced that the Bush administration isn't looking too hard for Osama Bin-Laden sometimes I even wonder if they indeed want to catch this man. Just last week they blow the cover of one of Pakistan's main snitches (an insider to Bin-Laden inner circle) who was giving Pakistan great information about Osama Bin Laden and his future plans.