![]() |
Quote:
Oh, and you haven't missed much. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But Vietnam really overshadows both of those administrations in my opinion. Especially LBJ. Neither of them, in my opinion (of course, this is all completely subjective) are as "great" as Reagan. Of course, you may disagree. Everyone, including myself is entitled to their own stupid opinion :D |
Reagan - Money
Quote:
Here's an idea - instead of everyone complaining - how about we let the Congress and the Senate vote on it. Since they represent America. If they pass it - then let it be so. If when another President dies they want to do the same, and they propose legislation and it passes - then so be it! |
Re: Reagan - Money
Quote:
Just because we're not congresspeople doesn't mean we don't get to have opinions on these things. |
Quote:
|
Griping
So sorry to offend anyone - in the semantics war. What I should have said, "If you don't have an intelligent argument one way or the other, then don't say anything." I wasn't trying to call to an end to the evil Greek Chat Politics forum! I was responding to another's post.
It's not like I'm planning to abolish Free Speech. Geez - lay off the coffee. |
Quote:
(Before anyone gets even more riled up there is a USS John S. McCain. Not named after the ex-Vietnam POW and senior senator from Arizona, but after his father, Adm. John S. McCain, Jr., commander-in-chief of the Pacific Fleet in Vietnam.) Not bad for a glow-in-the-dark bubblehead. (Disparaging Navyspeak for a nuclear submariner - Carter was an engineering officer in the early days of the Nuclear Navy. The title of his first autobiography "Why Not The Best?" comes from a remark said to him when he underwent his dreaded interview with Adm. Hyman Rickover, the 'father of the nuclear Navy'.) |
Quote:
I respected President Reagan. I didn't ever vote for him -- always campaigned and voted against him, in fact. Like pretty much any president he did some good and some not so good. I thought, and in some instances, continue to think that many of his policies were not good for the country. And, no, I'm not a left-winger. But I respected him, if for no other reason than because he was President. That alone demands my respect, even if the holder of that office is Bill Clinton or George W. Bush. I have little patience with those who place partisanship above simple repect for the person who holds the highest office in the country. My opinion -- Congress should never consider placing a president on money unless (1) it has been at least 25 years since that person was president and (2) it has been at least 15 years since that person died. History does give some perspective, such as whether Reagan deserves to be on the $10 bill more than the author of the Federalist Papers, without whom we would not have constitutional system we have enjoyed for the last 200+ years. |
I am against it but I don't see why Democrats would care. It's not like they are putting Reagan's pic on foodstamps. As long as his pic is put on a large denomination bill the Dems won't have to see him.
|
$10 is large?
|
Quote:
Actually what Mysticat says is a pretty decent notion. Kind of like Catholic Sainthood. It must be so many years past your death before you qualify. I like that. |
Quote:
Also, blaming Woodrow Wilson for the Great Depression is absolutely absurd, and indefensible. His outlook on international affairs almost completely composes the Post-WWII international stage. He may actually prove to be the 20th century American president with the greatest influence in global affairs. Ranking LBJ ahead of Reagan deserves debate though. Reagan clearly beats him in foreign affairs. Domestically, the Great Society was a double edged sword. It advanced civil rights, and allowed many to escape poverty, while institutionalizing poverty for many more. |
Dont know this for certain, why Im asking:
Wasnt Lincoln involved in some fairly shady activity? I remember reading that his successor, Andrew Johnson, was essentially impeached for things done by Lincoln that he would have been tried for, had he not been assassinated. If someone knows more, please post. Just illustrating that no president was perfect, and its more the traits we admire in others that we should emulate instead of the person himself. Its okay to admire Clinton for the good things he did in office without thinking of the Monica thing, and its okay to admire Reagan for the things he did, even if in '47 his weekend softball team was racially disproportionate. :rolleyes: |
This article mentions that Nancy is against the idea but they are still going to try to push the bill through.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...gan_us_money_1 |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.