![]() |
Re: Re: Re: SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
Quote:
People don't act out as individuals. The guys that drink, drink in a group. The guys that haze, haze in a group. If you don't care about what others do because it's only "individuals", then don't care about us "individuals" that care and want to lower our risk. -Rudey |
Re: Re: Re: Re: SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
Quote:
Our area facilitator was talking about not being all work and no play, which is most likely the cause of our decreased alumni involvement. People are getting burnt out from trying so hard to create this image of greeks as incredible multitaskers who can have the best grades, volunteer portfolio, programs, raise the most money, etc. We are trying so hard to lose the stereotype that we are losing the fun (which DOESNT mean parties) that Greek orgs are also about. No one wants to be part of an organization that doesnt have time to hang out with their friends or cant hold a part time job because your life is all consumed by trying to impress people. What do we really get by trying to impress everyone? We just need to slow it down, stick to our ideals, and not worry about the :results or numbers. Its quality of what we do anyway, not quantity. I also think there is a big difference between sororities and fraternities, or at least on my campus. Fraternities break all the hazing and drinking rules out in the open and frankly no one really cares or gets in trouble. The stereotype of a fraternity guy rings so true. But the sororities on campus are different and are very cautious about what they do, our Panhellenic board definitely has disciplined chapters that were in question about doing something, although there was not even evidence. I think we are not understanding each others points of views because i have only seen what has gone on at my own campus. |
Having been a division officer, I have seen first hand much of what the article spotlights.
I think it is important. Important enough that I copied it into the Risk Management forum in its entirity. Unfortunately, I also think that most of it is absolutely true. Some Greeks do dumb things, and then whine when they get caught. Read the threads in Risk Management. |
Great article, and true on so many levels. Most of us just don't want to admit it. Co-sign to Rudey...this could be a first!
|
Re: Re: Re: SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
I think you are being full of it lol . . . if you want to take that approach Russ, expell all your members that drink under age because that is the major riskfactor.
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
Creed no, reality yes. Look at their calendars and count the amount of social activities versus anything else.
I am not saying its a bad thing at all. But its what we are. Quote:
|
Re: SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
Quote:
As I see it, this is what we are. |
I found this article to be rather lacking...where is the part where he talks about concrete solutions?
|
Re: Re: SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
All that outweighed your unofficial parties, exchanges, mixers, formals, and just hanging out and drinking with each other?
I am impressed. Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
If you eliminate intramurals does it still outweight socail type activities? Keeping in mind that a lot of the philanthropy mainstream greeks do is social in nature.
Quote:
|
Re: SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
Quote:
I would say that most weeks had 2-3 hours of IMs that drew a large spectator crowd. There were probably another 2-3 hours, maybe more, of IMs that did not. If you were to add up the number of socials in a semester, there would usually be 3, plus 1 for homecoming or greek week. That's maybe 24 hours for the semester. Add 2 BBQs with sororities before football games, and that's another 6 hours. Two date functions a semester for another 16 hours. That's 46 hours, or about 3 hours/week of organized social events. It probably works out to 6-8 hours/week of being around alcohol. When you start adding up all of the other things that we do, we're in an organized capacity doing things without alcohol more than our combined, and informal, events that are around alcohol. |
I know GP said on here once that she's tired of our founders being turned into perfect deities, and I agree. There's mentions of our founders hosting house parties for the Hampden-Sydney men, so obviously they were taking time to have fun. They weren't just discussing the Great Books or helping the downtrodden.
If we didn't have a social component, and a very strong one at that, why would be select who our members are? If it's all about philanthropy and academics, do you really need to like the people to accomplish those goals? |
Quote:
ETA: Parties at the time your founders lived were NOT the parties of today! |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.