If NPR talks one more time about Janet's nipple, I swear I'm gonna smack somebody. :mad: The media are the ones "shocking" our kids more with the constant replaying/posting of pictures, videos, etc.

I didn't even watch the Superbowl yesterday, but thanks to EVERY media outlets this morning, I got to see Janet's boob in all its glory. :rolleyes:

I guess its "cool" and "hot" for Britney/Madonna/Christina to smooch it up on MTV, but not on CBS. Plus, has anyone seen a daytime soap lately? :eek: Talk about raunchy. If the head of the FCC was to yap about something, let's yap it up about ALL of TV and not just the Superbowl halftime show.

Re: my boy's tripping on Janet ha ha
 

ROTFLMAO!!!!!

My manfriend told me about this last night. He was all giddy, lol. I said, "You happy, huh?" He was like, "H*ll yeah! It was a good superbowl!!" That made me LOL, too.

Re: Re: my boy's tripping on Janet ha ha
 

My boyfriend only saw it because I sent him the pic. His response, "It's only a ______." Yaaaaaaaaaay him, lol.

Re: Re: Re: my boy's tripping on Janet ha ha
 

Lucky you. My distraction didn't watch the game, but when we talked about it said he would have to look up the pic online. :rolleyes:

I am about 70% sure he was kidding.

I think it was clearly done to promote Janet's new CD. I was just over on mtv.com reading about how it is supposed to be her "sexiest work yet." Now, I have no clue how she will top Would U Mind, but I think this whole debacle was setting the stage for the direction her new album is supposed to take her in.

I agree...but at the expense of some young kids caught off guard:(

Oh...they'll be ok. I've seen worse as a young kid (think Purple Rain) and I turned out ok. :D

You did???

:o :eek: :p

That may be the case...but purple rain isn't a fair comparison to the graphic images that these kids are exposed to on a day to day basis on prime time TV... they have sexual imagery rammed down their throats all the time.... when i was growing up you would have never seen two men/women kiss in primetime....now its all about the bottom dollar...to hell with family values:confused: :(

Janet's bogus apology
 

http://entertainment.msn.com/news/ar...px?news=148561

Janet Jackson Apologizes for Bared Breast
Feb 2, 7:51 PM EST

Associated Press

Janet Jackson apologized Monday for an incident in which one of her breasts was bared for a moment as she sang with Justin Timberlake during the Super Bowl halftime show Sunday night.

In a statement released Monday night, Jackson said it was a last-minute stunt that went awry.

"The decision to have a costume reveal at the end of my halftime show performance was made after final rehearsals. MTV was completely unaware of it," Jackson said. "It was not my intention that it go as far as it did. I apologize to anyone offended — including the audience, MTV, CBS and the NFL."

Jackson's performance with Timberlake sparked a federal investigation and set new standards for raunch in an entertainment industry that seems to be setting new highs — or lows — every day.

"Every time an artist does something you think they sort of break the barrier, and it keeps getting more and more outrageous," said Tom Poleman, senior vice president of programming at New York City radio station Z100. "I think artists will keep on exploiting every opportunity they can get."

When Timberlake snatched off part of Jackson's bustier, revealing a breast clad only in a sun-shaped "nipple shield," the barrier was shattered before 89 million viewers.

Federal Communications Commission chief Michael Powell said in a statement, "Like millions of Americans, my family and I gathered around the television for a celebration. Instead, that celebration was tainted by a classless, crass and deplorable stunt." He promised an investigation, with potential fines of up to $27,500. If applied to each CBS station, the fine could reach the millions.

Despite the apparent premeditation — the display coincided exactly with Timberlake singing, "I'm gonna have you naked by the end of this song" — all involved denied that the peep show was planned, and Jackson and Timberlake both issued apologies.

"This was done completely without our knowledge," said Chris Ender, entertainment spokesman for CBS, which was deluged with angry calls. "It wasn't rehearsed. It wasn't discussed. It wasn't even hinted at. ... This is something we would have never approved. We are angry and embarrassed."

The NFL said it was "extremely disappointed." Several members of Congress, the Parents Television Council and the Traditional Values Coalition expressed outrage. Even halftime producer and CBS corporate Viacom cousin MTV — the network that has given us "Jackass," Diana Ross fondling Lil Kim's pastied breast and Madonna kissing Britney Spears at last August's MTV Awards — was contrite.

"Unrehearsed, unplanned, completely unintentional," said MTV.

But was it?

Although Timberlake issued a statement shortly after the show blaming the debacle on a "wardrobe malfunction," in comments to the syndicated show "Access Hollywood" right after the incident, he didn't seem too sorry.

"Hey man, we love giving you all something to talk about," he said, laughing.

Jackson's official Web site was bombarded with angry postings. Her spokeswoman, Jennifer Holiner, said a red lace garment was supposed to remain when Timberlake tore off the outer covering.

Holiner said she was not sure whether Jackson's medieval-looking nipple decoration was meant to be seen, but added that the singer does wear such jewelry.

But the display still raised questions such as: If it was an accident, why did a choreographer promise "shocking moments" in an interview with the Web site MTV.com prior to the show? And how could it be a coincidence with the timing of the words to Timberlake's song "Rock Your Body"?

MTV Networks Group President Judy McGrath says the shocker was supposed to be Timberlake's appearance — and not what he did afterward. McGrath was sitting in the audience and didn't see the flash, but said the pair "looked upset" afterward.

While she praised Jackson and Timberlake as artists, she said: "I don't appreciate someone who doesn't communicate what their plans are. I think it was misguided move on their parts."

Whatever the intent of the stunt, it is not the first time Jackson has used her sexuality to grab an audience. Over the years, Jackson, 37, has evolved from a shy innocent who barely showed her ankles to a vamp who has bared almost all on regular basis.

A classic Rolling Stone magazine cover in 1993 showed a topless Jackson, her breasts covered only by the hands of her then-husband. At the time, she was promoting the album "Janet," which was described as her first time exploring sexuality in her music.

She has revisited that theme often. Promoting "The Velvet Rope" album in 1997, she appeared on the cover of Vibe wearing a nipple ring on the outside of her clothing. On her last album, "All for You," she appeared on the album's artwork nude, obscured only by a sheet. And in a recent HBO concert special, Jackson was seen running topless in a waterfall, though her breasts were barely visible.

And of course, Jackson has a new album, "Damita Jo," due out in the spring. The single, "Just a Little While," hit radio late last week. Already, the hype for the album promises a disc in which Jackson explores — what else? — her sexuality.

Asked whether he thought the strip tease was an accident, Z100's Poleman laughed.

"Are you kidding me?" he said.

Over-the-air TV channels cannot air "obscene" material at any time and cannot air "indecent" material between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. The FCC defines obscene as describing sexual conduct "in a patently offensive way" and lacking "serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value." Indecent material is not as offensive but still contains references to sex or excretions.

The FCC has come under fire from lawmakers and outside groups who say the agency hasn't done enough to shield the public from indecent programming. The Bush administration has endorsed a bill raising the $27,500 maximum fine to $275,000.

Over at Z100, whose audience tends to range from 12 to 34 years old, the radio station was playing Jackson's new single every two hours on Monday.

"All of our listeners, they saw right through it," Poleman said. "Nobody is buying for a second that it wasn't a setup, but at the same time, they're cool with it."

So were stores that sell nipple jewelry. In Greenwich Village, Cassioppia Tattoo and Piercing's owner Bianca Bubenik placed a newspaper photo of the singer and her exposed breast in a display case alongside nipple decorations similar to the one Jackson wore.

"She's coming out with a new CD soon," Bubenik said. "We were just discussing it this morning — it's a publicity stunt."

And it has people talking at just the right time about Jackson — until the next celebrity shocker.

Already this year, we've seen Britney's 55-hour marriage, Michael Jackson dancing at his child molestation arraignment and Steve Irwin frolicking with his newborn and a crocodile ... and it's only February.

"Who knows?" said Poleman. "It's up to their imagination."

———

AP writers David Bauder, Christy Lemire and Jonathan D. Salant contributed to this report.



Copyright 2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
advertisement

Apples and oranges
 

Don't think that's a fair comparison. With Purple Rain you knew what you were getting into when you chose to watch it. This was totally off guard and the Super Bowl does not carry a Parental Discretion Advised warning.

As to the act itself. It happened so fast that I did not even see her boob until today on all the webites. It's unfortunate because for once the game itself was exciting enough to hold its own and didn't need all the hoopla - LOL.

Correct me if i'm wrong, but I thought that lady showed her a$$ and her coochie on Purple Rain.

Re: Apples and oranges
 

Sisterfriend,
I have to disagree with you. Your not comparing apples and oranges, your comparing the same fruit. Have you been to Janet's concerts lately? I have and they can get pretty wild. Her Velvet Rope tour, she tied up people and pranced around them and on them in a sexual way. Did you see her HBO special where she was all over the young man and you can hear him saying "I'm so hard?" Have you seen her pictures where they get more and more sexier (remember Rolling Stone and her nipples were covered by her husband? Remember the video were she expose her nipple (but it was covered up by MTV)? Have you read her interviews? Remember the Buster video with her wearing the penis rings. I'm not suprised by what happened. Planned or unplanned it happened and now get over it. Young kids are not having boob nightmares. Masses of kids will not be looking for nipple rings. It happened, these things happen, now people are calling for federal investigations. IT WAS A BREAST PEOPLE, remember we breast feed our kids so at one time or another young children have seen a bare breast. This is why the rest of the world laughs at us because we take incidents like this and take them to the nth degree. Remember, people are still dying in Iraq. But no one is talking about the guy who streaked.

Just My Opinion!!!

Re: Heres the picks from AP
 

I must be in the minority because I honestly think the breast popping out was not part of the act. I believe they plan the bra snatch. But someone should have told Janet that the "leather or vinyl" moves down without support (i.e. the bra).

All my 6th-graders were talking about it in class today...boy, if I had a nickel for each time I heard, "Did you see the Superbowl halftime show where Janet Jackson...?" I saw it, but I couldn't really believe it...neither could anyone else at the party I was at. All eight of us just stopped talking and stared blankly at each other for a minute until we regained control of our faculties, and then we decided that she must've had on a pasty or something...but apparently not. :eek: