![]() |
Well you may find that not having a house could come to be a blessing. Your costs will be lowered DRAMATICALLY and you'll be left to concentrate on what matters -- brotherhood. It's not the end of the world. Many chapters operate without a house. It sounds like your chapter might actually come through this whole ordeal.
|
I'd just like to add that a school has every right to be residential. They just have to inform prospective students of this beforehand so that they know what they're getting into. At a school as small as mine it makes sense to have a residential campus because if nobody lived here, then nobody'd be here. Here, everybody has to live on campus. Exceptions go to those who are more than four years out of high school, those who are living with family (includes parents/relatives, married, divorced, widowed, or have children), who are veterans of the armed forces, or who own a house. As my old English teacher used to say, "If you don't like it, then you can lump it, or you can leave."
|
Quote:
The brotherhoods and sisterhoods there operated great without houses just as the one fraternity who did have a house did. And while this next parallel isn't entirely the same situation, many if not most professional GLO's don't have houses, or can't have houses, and many of them do great all the same ! :) |
And on another note, I really have to agree with KKC's post here. The Greeks had a HUGE privilage. I know if I was an underclassman who was not in a GLO and forced to live in residence halls, I'd be a lil irked by it. While I think it is not cool, it's just like someone earlier said, a few bad apples spoil the bunch. Privilages like that would make me think the Greeks would stick together to make sure their privilages aren't taken away by the acts of a few.
Just my .02 on that. Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.