![]() |
Quote:
If we want the Greek system to survive, we are going to have to get rid of almost everything that has connotations with hazing. Even essentially harmless things like making big/lil paddles, scavenger hunts, wearing pledge pins for all your waking hours, and signing pledge books -- they can be misinterpreted by non-Greeks and hurt our image the same way that harmful hazing does, because they hint at darker things going on beneath the surface. Yes, I do think that certain measures that are being taken are a little extreme, but in the long run they're probably also going to be necessary. |
Quote:
|
If you simply adhere to your org's hazing policies and state laws you'll be fine.
Plenty of great options remain for the new member process. You just have to think outside the box sometimes. If you've got problems, call your HQ and they will have answers for you. If not, research what other organizations are doing. I'm not going to go find the exact URL but if you go to www.sigmanu.com you can find what we're doing -- it's called the LEAD program. Great ideas in there. Check it out. |
I think sugar and spice hit the nail right on the head. Obviously making someone a paddle for decorative purposes is not the same as drinking someone to death. But if your image is tainted, as ours has been, you need to look cleaner than clean to repair it.
What I don't get is how "not hazing" equates to "not working." Even the strictest hazing laws don't say new members can't be required to do things. They just aren't required to do things that initiated members aren't (or that don't have a very close equivalent). Do you require sisters to wear their badges on Wednesdays? Then you can require the new members to wear their pins then too. Do sisters have to attend weekly chapter meetings? Then new members can be required to attend weekly class meetings. Does everyone have to go to philanthropy events? That includes the new members too. Now maybe these things don't make as strong a bond within the pledge class. I believe it de-emphasizes the class bond and strengthens the overall chapter bond, because it's not you against them to accomplish something. But is that a bad thing? At my school, people weren't necessarily closest to their pledge class. But the retention of members was so much better than what I've seen at most other schools since I've graduated. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I hear you
Starang21, I hear what you are saying. Membership comes with privileges, and in my opinion, you need to put in effort to earn those privileges. I want to see whether or not a person is going to be loyal, respectful, and bring a diligent work ethic to her classes and my organization BEFORE she can call herself my sister. This is not something I want to find out after she is already wearing my letters.
The membership process is a time for the prospectives to learn and the actives/alumnae to teach. It's a time for the class to learn how to work as a team, how to be resourceful, how to rise to challenges (not hazing) and feel a sense of accomplishment when they reach heights they never thought they would. It's also a time for actives and alumnae to teach (not haze) the ladies about their history, what they value, what they focus on, how they operate the chapter and national, and emphasize that they are making a LIFE LONG COMMITMENT. It is during this process that ladies need to truly decide if they want to become members, and if they are willing to take on the responsibility that goes with it. But...it would be too late for that if I already gave them my letters, right? This is just my opinion. |
Re: I hear you
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.