![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Though I think it's also true that many or most fraternities founded in the mid 19th century South have problematic historic relationships with white supremacy. |
While I would agree, my organization and others have problematic pasts, which I'm happy to get into elsewhere, not too many years ago, Kappa Alpha was still holding their "Old South" event where they all dressed up in their Confederate uniforms (what kind of person has that in their closet? Are they all Civil War reinactors?) and paraded around campus, in many cases making sure to stop for awhile in front of NPHC houses.
That's a sort of past an organization shouldn't just walk away from, but run. Organizations with white supremacist pasts will raise legitimate questions when they align with white supremacists as an organization. That picture depicts what one would assume is the assent of the entire chapter to put up those sandbags and signage. It's not too hard to read between those lines. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm hesitant to indict individual 18 and 19 year olds for actions taken by a group before the period of their membership. If we're going to do that fairly, then there would be no arbitrary time limit imposed (whether 4 years or 140 years) and all individual members must be denounced for affiliation with such an organization regardless of how far back the violation occurred and regardless of what amends have been made in the interim. Arbitrary time limits are capricious and serve only as a scape goat that permits us to denounce others while declaring our own ethical perfection. |
Okay.
|
Quote:
|
Back on topic.
"With 1,026 chapters and nearly 300,000 members, AKA is no small army. And it’s being reinforced by other members of the “Divine Nine” Black fraternities and sororities, with a total membership approaching 1 million, all working informally in their communities." https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...-KqaQ7_uPxagMw |
Quote:
I also question this assertion the Wapo made without evidence: Quote:
The reporter, Chelsea Jane, got the 2020 election beat after a couple years compiling box scores of San Diego Padres games as a junior reporter for MLB.com. If she'd quoted an expert source or provided data for her assertion that would be one thing, but she doesn't have the personal qualifications or journalistic pedigree that would give me any confidence in an unsourced assertion she made from her own independent analysis. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
His rhetoric is more OAN or Breitbart than Trump TV (Faux). |
That's actually not what the sentence is saying. Look at it in context: the previous sentence is about the number of members of AKA. "With a total membership approaching 1 million, is a parenthetical. "All working informally in their communities" refers to "other members" at the beginning of the sentence, not the entire membership of the Divine Nine. The next paragraph is a quote from someone who is a member of another D9 group.
And so what if the reporter was formerly a sportswriter? People in media change beats ALL THE TIME. Team beat writers (which she was for the Nationals for several years) are as in-depth on those beats as political writers, business writers, etc. are on their beats. Nice info cherry-picking. :rolleyes: |
Quote:
He showed disloyalty to his house and threw them under the bus in order to take a job in the school's administration. I don't think that'll inspire the Greek vote. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.