![]() |
Re: Iverson
Quote:
PM_Mama, if you think that people (and specifically black men) are never wrongly accused of crimes, I invite you to spend a day with me at my work. It happens all the time, and athletes are guaranteed the same rights under our constitution as you are. If he is charged with a crime, the state needs to prove it BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, and unless and until that happens, he is PRESUMED INNOCENT. There is a huge difference between being CHARGED with a crime and being CONVICTED of one. The "equal rights activists" are hopefully out there protecting the rights of everyone, from famous athletes to the homeless guy sleeping in the park. |
Re: Re: Iverson
Quote:
And about being wrongly accused... my ex boyfriend/good friend who I love dearly is probably going to jail next week on his birthday for something that he didn't do or had anything to do with, but there is really not a lot of evidence to prove him innocent. So yes, I do believe people can be wrongly accused. And yeah I hope the equal rights activists are protecting everyone. My whole point of my post was to say that there are a LOT of athletes who get away with things... as well as politicians, actors/actresses, musicians, and it's sick. When any other normal Joe would get arrested for drug abuse or whatever, if he got charged/convicted he woudln't be able to work because he'd be in jail (I guess... that's how it is in my friend's case). However, a lot of famous people, like Robert Downey, Jr. are continuously released and let to work again. Or in athletes situations, play again and receive millions of dollars. |
Re: Re: Re: Iverson
Quote:
Quote:
Bottom line: a shitload of people "get away with things", as you put it - usually it's due to OTHER PEOPLE getting them off, not themselves. Whether it be an upper-class white man paying for good lawyers, or getting off b/c a 'jury of your peers' is just that, and lets you off for no apparent reason - there's no reason to jack on a sports figure just b/c he's famous. As a post-script - the latest from the Philly PD is that no blood was found in his wife's car - just the broken glass. The plot thins. |
Re: Re: Re: Iverson
Quote:
I also don't think that you are qualified to comment on what happens when "any other normal Joe" gets convicted of a crime. Most people who are convicted of lesser felonies, including drug possession, weapons possession, forgery, theft, battery, etc., especially when it is a first offense, do NOT get jail time. Our jails are overcrowded as it is, and often probation is an option because we do not have the resources to be rounding up all the "average Joes" and throwing them in jail. I'm not trying to argue with you, but as someone with experience in criminal law, I don't want people coming away from this thread with a grossly inaccurate picture of how it all works, or doesn't work as the case may be. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Iverson
Quote:
Thank you for clearing up ur black man comment. I didn't know that is what you were talking about. I may not be qualified to comment on the average joe, but I'm entitled to my opinion and what I've seen from my personal point of view. Not everyone has experience in criminal law, and that is why some people's posts are helpful. If someone doesn't know about something, and they "inaccurately" say something, those GCers are there to help clear things up. But, as I said before, this is from my point of view. But thank you for your help in that. And someone mentioned something about "proving innocent". In my ex's case, it's pretty much guilty till proven innocent. I just realized for like the 100th time that he's a bastard tho, so let's not talk about that! |
Quote:
|
Update
Here's what the Philadelphia justice system decided to do w/little A.I.
Judge dismisses all but one charge against Iverson By MICHAEL RUBINKAM Associated Press Writer July 29, 2002 PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- NBA All-Star Allen Iverson was cleared of all but a misdemeanor Monday at a hearing into charges he stormed into his cousin's apartment with a gun and threatened two men while looking for his wife. Two counts of making terroristic threats were left standing after the six-hour preliminary hearing to determine whether prosecutors had enough evidence to try Iverson. ``It sounds like you had a relative looking for a relative at the house of a relative,'' Municipal Court Judge James DeLeon said. The ruling followed testimony from Iverson's two accusers and his cousin Shaun Bowman. Iverson, the NBA MVP in the 2000-01 season and a three-time league scoring champion, was accused of throwing his wife, Tawanna, out of their home, then barging into Bowman's apartment July 3. The Philadelphia 76ers guard was arrested on 14 felony and misdemeanor charges, including assault, terroristic threats and weapons offenses. Iverson's uncle also was charged and he, too, now faces only the misdemeanor. The original charges against Iverson carried a maximum sentence of more than 50 years. He was the subject of intense local media scrutiny after the allegations surfaced. Hordes of reporters and photographers camped outside Iverson's suburbanrges. It's not Iverson's first brush with the law. As a teenager in 1993, he was arrested after a bowling-alley brawl and spent four months in jail in Virginia before he was granted clemency by the governor. The conviction was later overturned. In 1997, Iverson pleaded no contest to gun possession. He also made an unreleased rap CD in which he used derogatory terms for women and gays, and he's fought several times with 76ers coach Larry Brown. Through it all, Iverson remains enormously popular. His 76ers jersey is the among the league's top sellers, and Reebok last year gave Iverson a lifetime extension of his 10-year, $50 million endorsement contract. updated at Mon Jul 29 13:54:11 2002 PT |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.