Quote:
Originally posted by Dexter
How many times do I need to say something about being an "INDIVIDUAL" in the frat. That's just selfish to close an entire thread because of one person's view. Why not just erase his post? I think it's unfair for an "INDIVIDUAL" to make decisions for us based on his "PERSONAL" cinvictions. There either needs to be some consultation or we need more than just one moderator.I was pledged with the idea of I-ME-MY-MINE are words that do not rhyme. WE-US-OURS-TOGETHER these are words that last forever. Maybe it's just me.
|
Dexter,
I understand the point you're trying to make. If I may, let me take the other side for a moment...
The way I look at it, every individual in a GLO is a public representative of that GLO. If one person acts like an idiot, and it makes headlines, who is affected by the person's action? The GLO, of course. This has happened time and again.
For example, a fraternity member goes out and drinks irresponsibley, gets in a car, and has a DUI related accident that kills another person. Who does the media talk about? The individual or the GLO he was a member of? I think we all know that the GLO winds up getting the worst press, and one stupid act is what people think about every time that GLO's name is mentioned, even months after the incident. So, people don't remember all the good things that the GLO does but, instead, recalls that one senseless act by one irresponsible individual.
The same holds true when a GLO member makes a racist statement. Even though I'll be the first to agree that it isn't fair, more often than not it is the GLO who is punished by being labeled a racist organization simply because someone made a stupid comment about a particular group of people.
I think that Professor was trying to prevent Alpha Phi Alpha from being portrayed negatively when he closed the thread after Fato posted his racist comment. Rather than have someone get the wrong impression of an organization that he holds close to his heart, Professor closed the thread. I find that admirable, and I have to say that I'd probably do the same if one of my DZ sisters suddenly came into the Delta Zeta forum to say that she "couldn't stand" black people.
Just because we all have freedom of speech, it doesn't mean that we can say whatever we want, whenever we want. As responsible members of our GLO's, we must hold ourselves to a higher standard. We have to think about the potential consequences of our words, and the effect that they may have on our organizations if a non-member hears them. Then and only then should we open our mouths (or in this case, place our hands on the keyboard).