![]() |
Okay
If they bust those pedophile priests, they need to bust R. Kelly!!!
One cannot stop record sales of a top grossing recording artist, especially if Arista, Virgin Records or Def Jam, allowed the money time for the studios to print the dayum thang!!! They are gonna recoup their money some how, some way... If the country chose to press charges, GOOD!!! And I hope he get's whooped for it too!!! That was wrong with his indiscretion and pedophilia... He'll probably wind up being one of those old men that chases after "pretty young thangs"... He may have a disease, like genital warts and herpes!!! Lawd hab mercy, should be his song... |
Quote:
OK, I just saw the pics for the first time (thanks lil_sunshine). No doubt about it - it's R Kelly's nasty a$$. I will NEVER support anything he does - ever again. Is his wife still with him? How old is she? |
Who Knew?
R. Kelly is married? I didn't know that. The only person I ever remember him being married to was Aaliyah.
Anyway, I totally believe that it was him in those videos and I know for certain that he has always had attraction to young girls. I went to high school (Chicago Area) and college (Champaign) in Illinois so, I ran into a lot of people that "knew" him. My friend from high school/college roommate remembers Robert (as she calls him) trying to hit on her at the Regal Theater. It's interesting that she said she was always too scared to talk to him because he was so much older than she was. I guess it's hard to break old habits. I will be tuned in, I'm dying to see what he has to say for himself. Pesonally, I think he's disgusting. |
... half on what baby?
R Kelly is married. He and his publicists did a good job of keeping it under wraps. I believe he has two kids also. I can't remember his wife's age, but 23 pops into my head. He has been married for a little bit now, so I think he married her young. I believe she was a dancer or something like that, but don't quote me on it. The fact that he is married just came out during this scandal, as a control strategy I guess.
I would love to believe that this was a set-up, but the man seems to have a history of loving young flesh. I think he is severely disturbed, and if proven guilty, he should fry. Frankly, I am tired of people saying the girl should have known better. She was a child, and he preys on children. One of these girls was neice to Sparkle, his protege. As I stated elsewhere, there are few betrayals like that. I did not watch the BET interview, because I believe that our media sometimes coddle black stars. Put him on the spot; make him sweat. The man goes underground, and then comes back with an "explanation" in his own good time. I do not mean to "judge" Rra, but as I said elsewhere, half on a baby is cool, but half on a baby WITH a baby is sick! |
Wait til you see the VIDEO...
Quote:
112 |
Mannnn please. I don't believe for one minute that he hasn't seen the tape! He tried to say that if somebody says they have you on tape robbing a bank and you didn't do it, there would be no reason to watch it. But please believe if somebody tells me they are SURE it's me on some tape, I'ma watch that mess out of curiousity. It's not believable to think he never saw it... I can't tell y'all how angry I'm getting!
Anybody else heard rumors about a look-a-like coming forward and "admitting" to being the man on the tape? |
Oooohhhh... I take back the "coddling" comment. Ed Gordon made him squirm. The show is going off as I speak. Ouch. Hmmm... can there really be smoke without a fire. He didn't seem credible to me.
|
Here's why my fiance and I know he's lying. Ed Gordon asked him has he ever made sex tapes. "Robert" answered that there are a lot of bad things he's done in his life. Okay fine. Then Ed Gordon asked him that if he has ever made ANY sex tapes how can he be so sure that this is not one of those tapes. "Robert" never answered that question. He went all around it.
If he made sex tapes, fine. But one would think he would want to watch it because it could very well be a tape of him and another consenting adult as opposed to a child. And if that's the case, then he could've cleared this up a long time ago. But oh no, he won't watch the tape because he knows it's not him even though it could be him. C'mon "Robert" make a little sense, please. But again, I believe he's straight up lying. And as far as the Aaliyah thing. I'm sure her family and he are sick of it. However, if you didn't marry her when she was a child, then you would just say you didn't and leave it at that. If you didn't marry a child, how could her family be upset by a simple "no we never married" and then next question. And again..., lying. |
Yeah, "Rra' (as i saw it spelt elsewhere) seemed kinda close to guilty...
|
I smell...........
GUILT
He looked like someone who's been causght in the act! His body language and all removed all doubt for me.:o :( |
"Rra" needs to come clean. He did not answer the questions to me, plus his fidgeting didn't help. He looked like he was trying to hide something. I am a little upset that Ed bought up Aliyah, really his annulled marriage to her had nothing to do with the purpose of tonight's interview. I was shock to find out that he is married and had a couple of kids. Where have I been? Am I the only one that didn't know this?
|
nasty ain't the word for that video. the first girl did not seem to be a minor. the last girl was most defintely a baby. the tape was not a good one. something was kind of off about the tape to me. there was always some sort of shadow or something blocking his face. his face was always at some sort of angle; however, the girls faces were quite clear. his comment about having a problem that this pastor meeks is helping him with makes me say hmmmm. whoever did those things to that little girl needs help. when he urinated on her, it seemed as if she was holding her breath-trying not to choke. the brother must have been taking some pills or something. he was like the energizer bunny- he kept going and going and going. her little organ looked liked a baby's organ. it was just awful. whoever did it needs serious help. another thing, she would please him orally and then he would stop and walk away then come back. he did this several times. i was wondering if he was dipping it in something. oh yeah, he made her call him daddy - "do it to me daddy," "oooo daddy". i could not believe any of it. he gave her money. i wonder how much money was it. even though the man in the tape resembled RKelly, I could not positively identify him. he was alway distorted for some reason. did he say that he is dealing with a third law suit?
|
That klucker was lying. LMAO
He lied about his "dealings" with Sparkle...(only business), then it became personal... He didn't want to discuss Aaliyah, but I be an attorney will bring it out in court to show a pattern. Rev.Meeks has alot of work to do with this one. You hear he finally admits that he has a wife,huh? Klucker (having sex with children klucker), straight up! NOW, he wants to think about his family, he wasn't thinking about them then. :rolleyes: Whoever his attorneys are, they did not "prep" him well. Let's see what part 2 will have in store... |
Here in Chicago, Kelly did an interview with Robin Robinson from Fox news Chicago. The viewer's poll came out in favor of him is what I'm told and I find that hard to believe. Rev. Meeks, when asked if he believed Kelly, stated we are not to judge and are to take people by their word. To me that sounds like even he doesn't believe Kelly. Shouldn't your pastor, if he really believed you, say something along the lines of "Yes, I believe he did not do the things people say he has done"?
I saw parts of the tape because it's everywhere here and there are times it's as though he is looking straight at the camera. Another thing about the tape that disturbs me is the look on his face as he is wiping the young girl off. It seems like a fther cleaning off his daughter with a creepy twist to it because of his age and size over her. Kelly also said his lawyers made him pay off the girls because he didn't want bad publicity. Fire those lawyers! You still got the bad publicity. If I knew in my hearts of hearts I did not do it I will fight it in court |
I saw R on BET last night and he did nothing to clear up the controversy. If anything, he left us with more questions to ask. He might as well have kept doing what he was doing and kept quiet. That way he was dancing around the questions kind of sealed his guilt.
On a radio station in Baltimore one of the DJ's interviewed one of the members of public annoucement. And he said he saw the tape and quote "That's that cat man" he also said that they knew the underage girl in the video and she was much younger than 17 at the time. He also confirmed that she was realted to Sparkle. But he conviently danced around the question of you knew this was going on and you did nothing. YOu have to wonder what his motives are for speaking out like that. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.