Alpha O |
10-03-2013 05:54 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by KDCat
(Post 2244234)
I would also encourage other members of GLOs in the class to complain on course evaluations about the behavior. I would make the complaint two pronged: 1) it's a stupid insult and 2) it's a waste of time. Encourage the students after you to make the same complaints in the course evaluations. It might take a few go-rounds for him to change his behavior.
|
Additionally, I would recommend that if the university does a senior survey about the college experience as graduation approaches, to encourage seniors to note this again in the appropriate spot within that evaluation.
I don't know how other universities work with regards to this, but I know that at my alma mater, filling out the senior survey was required and they had a spot for us to evaluate a certain number of professors. I used that space mostly for positive evaluations, but also for a negative one for a professor I encountered who was really unprofessional. I had previously noted this in the professor's course evaluation, but I figured it couldn't hurt to put it there as well, especially since one of the purposes of this type survey is to improve the college experience for future generations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sigmadiva
(Post 2244213)
/hijack - tangent/
I have to disagree with this term. I know that this idea has crept into higher ed, but it is an erroneous way for students to think.
The idea that students are 'paying customers' implies that you can pay for what you want. That is to say, since students are paying, and they all want A's, then that is what they should be given - an A because they paid.
Students are paying for the opportunity to receive an education. The grade they get is the grade they earn through their efforts in the class. Not because they are 'paying customers'.
/end hijack - tangent/
|
I know this is a tangent, but I have to disagree with you here to a certain extent. I don't think that students are paying customers in terms of grades, but they are paying customers in terms of the type of education received.
Some students avoid professors who are thought to be weaker at teaching the material than others. Some students who seek out "easier" professors because they believe they will not have to work as hard to get a good grade. Some students pick a professor based on how that professor structures the class. Some students just don't care about these things. I do believe that in this way students certainly are paying customers.
I will also say that few of the best classes I took at college were small, graduate-level seminar classes in which the the professor took this idea further in the sense that students had some input on the topics to be discussed and possibly even other aspects of the syllabus. Obviously this idea is not practical for classes with a large student size, but I think it can work amazingly well if utilized properly.
|