![]() |
Quote:
|
While a different t-shirt is not like "paddling the pledges". pressuring the pledges to commit a crime or mandatory alcohol shots. It's the broad sense of treating one group of the same fraternity/sorority different than the rest. It's subjective.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
There's a whole lot of grey area when it comes to hazing, and I (personally) would rank this as not-a-big-deal-and-don't-want-real-hazing-lumped-into-this-category-type-thing. Again, that's just my take-away from all of this. |
Quote:
By definition, hazing is not about treating different members differently. Hazing has to do with harassment; real or potential physical, mental or emotional endangerment; demeaning someone or subjecting them to ridicule or embarrassment as part of an initiation. Like I said, some groups have decided to use simple bright lines like "anything where members are treated differently" as a means of ensuring no one actually crosses the line. (And as I intimated, if those groups don't let NMs wear the badge or participate in all ritual, then I question whether they really are drawing the line at anything that treats members differently.) If that works for those groups, fine. But be aware that other groups may not draw the line there. To say simply "it's hazing" rather than "my group considers it hazing" risks effectively claiming that the national policies of some other GLOs require hazing. |
So, I've noticed the attitude toward wearing letters is different depending on the area. From my background, only non-new members can wear the actual Greek letters. But, they're okay to wear by anyone if it's a shirt with a bunch of letters on it. Say, an IFC shirt or a party shirt.
But then I've run into other chapters where only Brothers can wear stitched letters, but anyone can wear them if they're screen printed. And then there's the "it doesn't matter" POV. I never get worked up about anyone's attitude towards them, really. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"Some activities and expectations which are considered to be hazing:
I would say that our definition of hazing falls on the strict end of the spectrum, but I think that's a good idea. That said, the Greek letters vs. spelled out words rule might have links to initiation ritual/meaning for some groups, and I respect that. |
We had Greek Week shirts with all the fraternities' and sororities' (around 20 groups total) letters on them. No one thought twice about it. Crests would have been another story.
I have never had a problem with our pledges wearing letters before initiation...but our letters correspond to an open motto, readable by anyone who looks at our crest. I would never, ever, ever presume to tell another group they should do the same, as I have no clue what their letters mean or whether it works the same way ours does. Finally, regardless of what your national HQ says, compelling new members to wear letters may ALSO be hazing, if it sets them apart from the general campus norms, cultures and traditions. |
Quote:
Quote:
This is the same for AST on both accounts. And our coat-of-arms is only for initiated sisters to wear (which may be what you meant by "members" in your statement?) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
However, on my campus, we were a little more lax with party shirts, philanthropy shirts, etc. For example, Derby Day shirts come to mind. Three** of the ten groups on our campus required initiation to wear letters, however, on the Derby Day shirts every year all 10 groups were listed by their letters and no one got worked up about it. Date party shirts could be either way- shortened nicknames, or small letters, particularly on the front pocket. This distinction was partly because those shirts were worn by the masses, whereas stitched letters were solely worn by members (new and initiated) of a specific group. Somehow we never considered the teeny letters on the front pocket or in the long list of sororities as truly "wearing the letters." As said above- campus culture variations and lots of people interpreting things the way they see fit. **At the time, on my campus, the other two were Pi Phi and ChiO. I guess either Chi-O's policy has changed or our campus applied their own rules? As far as I know, Pi Phi still holds out until initiation. |
Add Sigma Chi, and I believe Alpha Epsilon Phi as well, to the list of GLOs where only initiated members may wear Greek letters. I would also add that I’ve seen many a Sigma Chi Derby Day shirt that includes (Sigma Chi) letters on them and I don’t think it is a concern by IHQ.
|
Per Kappa Alpha Theta bylaws (paraphrased):
Only initiated members AND colony members may wear the Greek Letters Kappa Alpha Theta. There are exceptions: Theta's Greek letters may be worn by others IF they appear in a promotional sense WITH other fraternal organizations (e.g. philanthropy activities - banners, clothing, etc.). New members can wear the letters (e.g. on t-shirts) for the purpose of promoting the Greek system or philanthropic activities. So seeing our letters on a Derby Day tshirt (just for example) along with other GLOs is fine; and new members can wear those shirts. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.