![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...0jkL9m4_8U71MA |
IotaGuy, you know better than this. This issue is not about racial slurs. You may never be called a racial slur in your life (to your face). But, systemic oppression does not disappear just because people are smiling at you. Systemic oppression does not require people to be overtly rude or demeaning. That is why social inequalities (all social inequalities, and not just the inequalities that individuals care about when playing the Ranking of Oppressions) will always exist. ETA: The existence of successful racial and ethnic minorities does not reduce the existence and impact of systemic oppression.
The emphasis on slurs, prejudice, the overt, and kumbaya is why "colorblindness" was attempted and the resulting "colorblind racism" is pervasive. The idea was that if we can pretend there is no such thing as race, ethnicity, culture, language, and other things that differentiate groups of people, that means that humans are all robots that look alike, talk alike, live alike, etc.. More accurately, this was the "whiteness of the world" in that white privilege allowed whites (in general) to pretend that they, themselves, do not have a race and ethnicity. Under colorblindness and colorblind racism, whites transferred this into pretending as though "I don't see race." I have heard whites say things like "I don't even notice your race...you're kind of white like me." Uh...no, bitch, do not turn me into a white person to make yourself feel more comfortable and don't equate "race and ethnicity" with "racism". They are not synonymous. Although inequalities are durable as long as there are visable differences across people, that doesn't mean that we need to be ashamed and afraid of certain differences. Race, ethnicity, culture, and language are social and cultural rather than biological but they are still "real." Things do not stop being "real" just because humans created them. And this fits into this thread somehow: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBus4gHF1FE |
Quote:
|
Thanks for your insight, AOIIAngel, and I agree. Whites definitely do have culture(s) and there is a privilege in being able to choose whether to acknowledge racial, ethnic, and cultural heritage. Being a power majority requires seeing whiteness as the standard and therefore "others" are different. The same applies to men who believe that only women have a gender, heterosexuals who only believe nonheterosexuals have a sexual orientation, and the list of power majorities-minorities goes on.
As for whites existing in a bubble, most racial, ethnic, cultural, language, religious, and other groups around the world are segregated by force (including government force and city planning committees that design where residential and businesses are placed in the cities) or segregated by choice. The average person in the United States, for example, has a family and friendship environment of people who look and behave as they do. Their work environment may be more diverse but there remain nondiverse work environments. I am a cross between W.E.B. DuBois and Booker T. Washington so I believe in both running into a neighborhood and saying "I'm here now, bitches" AND allowing people to separate themselves to the extent that their separation does not mean unfair advantages and unfair disadvantages. The latter is difficult to accomplish which is one of the many reasons the world is as it is. GC Race War Mode: Go to hell, AOIIAngel, I didn't read your post but I'm sure there is racism in there somewhere. You typed "white" and I can only imagine that you were saying something intolerant and insensitive. Booyah. Now what?! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...Op-q-ZsOE_NSc5 |
Quote:
Hell. I give up. I'll just go back to reading. |
It has been such a lovely, peaceful 10 months.... guess nothing is forever.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Wait...did you only ask that because I'm a Black woman?!?!?! Oh nooooooooo!!! :eek: http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...k_2ILbsaSQ2ftA Nah lemme mosey onalong 'fo GCers likea thetalady gets butthurt over dese hurr piece-full race threds no longa bein' a piece-full. 'cause u wus jus a smilin' n a typin' fo' I shows up. I causes a stirrr fo' da piece-full race threds. Da piece-full folkses don needs no stirrr n no uproarings frum a me...no surrr. U all jusa mosey onalong nah...I's so sawry...I's so sawry.... |
;)
|
I read you GC race war part first and was thinking, WTF did I say? LOL...you're really trying hard. Where is my picture of Wilfred Brimley to go with you diabeetus? My husband is an endocrinologist so he gets a copy of Diabetes every month in the mail. I get no end of pleasure announcing he's got "Diabeetus." Oh the small joys of life. Back to your friendly GC race war.
|
Yay! Dr Phil is back :)
That is my only contribution to this thread. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.